{"id":361395,"date":"2026-08-03T11:42:12","date_gmt":"2026-08-03T11:42:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/361395\/"},"modified":"2026-08-03T11:42:12","modified_gmt":"2026-08-03T11:42:12","slug":"st-pete-beach-sign-dispute-lands-in-federal-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/361395\/","title":{"rendered":"St. Pete Beach sign dispute lands in federal court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cIf you pass this ordinance,\u201d Plaza Beach Motel owner Rob Czyszczon told St. Pete Beach commissioners in June, \u201cthere will be consequences. There most likely will be a lawsuit.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Less than two weeks later, Plaza Beach Motel and Undertow Beach Bar\u00a0followed through, filing a federal lawsuit challenging the city\u2019s new beach sign ordinance.<\/p>\n<p>Although the lawsuit was filed last month, the case has seen little activity beyond procedural filings while the city sought additional time to respond.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-120572\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-120572\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/Rob-Czyszczon-254x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"254\" height=\"300\"  \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-120572\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Czyszczon<\/p>\n<p>Three weeks after that, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/stpetecatalyst.com\/arrests-made-in-st-pete-beachs-mothball-mystery\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Czyszczon was arrested<\/a> in an unrelated Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission investigation alleging he participated in scattering hundreds of mothballs throughout a black skimmer nesting area behind his hotel.<\/p>\n<p>The civil lawsuit and criminal case have nothing to do with one another. Together they have thrust Czyszczon into two separate legal battles involving St. Pete Beach.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute has grown beyond beachfront signs into a broader debate over private property rights, public beach access and Florida\u2019s customary use doctrine.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioners approved <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/stpetebeachfl.portal.civicclerk.com\/event\/3229\/files\/attachment\/13448\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Ordinance 2026-11<\/a> in June. It prohibits permanent signs, stakes, posts and similar structures within 50 feet of the Gulf while allowing removable A-frame signs elsewhere on the beach under certain conditions.<\/p>\n<p>Plaza Beach Motel and Undertow Beach Bar say the city unfairly singled out beachfront property owners by prohibiting their signs closest to the water while allowing government signs in the same area. They also object to restrictions limiting where signs may be placed and requiring city approval for certain signs, saying the rules make it harder to identify private property and discourage trespassing.<\/p>\n<p>In the lawsuit, the businesses ask a federal judge to declare the ordinance unconstitutional, prevent the city from enforcing it and award damages and attorneys\u2019 fees.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The issue came to a head during the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/stpetecatalyst.com\/beach-signs-ignite-a-bigger-fight-on-st-pete-beach\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">June City Commission meeting<\/a> where residents and beachfront business owners clashed over the city\u2019s proposed sign ordinance.<\/p>\n<p>Underlying the debate was Florida\u2019s customary use doctrine, a legal principle recognizing that privately owned dry sand beaches may still be subject to public recreational rights if those rights have been established through longstanding public use. Supporters of the ordinance argued those rights should be preserved.<\/p>\n<p>Resident Dominic Isgro told commissioners. \u201cWe have those rights, and we insist on them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Resident Deborah Schechtman focused on the signs themselves, describing one of the larger displays as \u201cegregious.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat we have here,\u201d she said, \u201care hotels trying to take over our right to walk on the beach.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Beachfront business owners saw it differently.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are not telling anybody they cannot walk the beach,\u201d Czyszczon told commissioners before the ordinance was adopted. \u201cWe just don\u2019t want you parking on the beach and staying on private property.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Beachfront businesses returned to that point throughout the debate, saying clearly marked property lines protect guests and help deputies enforce trespassing laws.<\/p>\n<p>The city later devoted<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/stpetecatalyst.com\/why-st-pete-beachs-beach-signs-sparked-a-legal-fight\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"> a public seminar to Florida\u2019s customary use doctrine<\/a>. City Attorney Ralf Brookes explain to the audience how the doctrine applies on St. Pete Beach, telling residents that a beachfront parcel can remain privately owned while also being subject to customary use rights. He also discussed recent court decisions and the city\u2019s legal history with customary use.<\/p>\n<p>The city has not yet filed its response in federal court.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, a federal judge granted the city\u2019s unopposed request for an additional 20 days to respond, extending its deadline to Aug. 19. In its motion, the city said it needed additional time because of the complexity of the constitutional claims and the recent engagement of outside counsel. Plaintiffs did not object to the request.<\/p>\n<p>Asked about the case, city spokesperson Marc Portugal said the ordinance was adopted to address safety concerns.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSt. Pete Beach is concerned that rebar, posts, stakes and signs at the waterline creates a public safety hazard for beachgoers,\u201d Portugal said. \u201cThe City is confident that the beach sign ordinance will withstand judicial review or make appropriate amendments.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\u201cIf you pass this ordinance,\u201d Plaza Beach Motel owner Rob Czyszczon told St. Pete Beach commissioners in June,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":319812,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[202,204,203,199,201,200],"class_list":["post-361395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-st-petersburg","tag-st-pete","tag-st-pete-headlines","tag-st-pete-news","tag-st-petersburg","tag-st-petersburg-headlines","tag-st-petersburg-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=361395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/361395\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/319812"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=361395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=361395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=361395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}