{"id":367782,"date":"2026-08-10T21:10:47","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T21:10:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/367782\/"},"modified":"2026-08-10T21:10:47","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T21:10:47","slug":"st-pete-utility-bills-could-rise-7-just-to-maintain-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/367782\/","title":{"rendered":"St. Pete utility bills could rise 7% just to maintain services"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>St. Petersburg residents could see their monthly utility bills climb by nearly 7% next year, an increase city officials say is needed largely to maintain existing services and keep planned infrastructure work moving as costs rise.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed rates, outlined in a presentation to the St. Petersburg City Council Aug. 6, would increase the monthly bill for what the city considers a typical residential customer by 6.86%. Customers who also receive reclaimed water, treated wastewater reused for lawn irrigation, would see a 7.71% increase.<\/p>\n<p>The city\u2019s estimate is based on a household using 3,500 gallons of water per month. The actual increase would vary based on water use and the services a household receives.<\/p>\n<p>Utility bills cover several city services, and their rates would not all rise by the same amount. Drinking water would increase 7.5%, wastewater 6.5%, garbage and recycling 6% and stormwater 8.5%. Each increase applies only to that service\u2019s share of the bill. Reclaimed water would increase 9.75%.<\/p>\n<p>The increases come as the city\u2019s own affordability review shows rising utility costs are beginning to put more pressure on household budgets. While several measures still indicate bills are generally affordable, others show growing strain, particularly for lower-income residents. The city\u2019s analysis warns that continued rate increases could make affordability a greater concern.<\/p>\n<p>Council Member Richie Floyd questioned whether looking at the rates one year at a time understates what residents have been asked to absorb over the past decade.<\/p>\n<p>He also raised a broader issue: whether today\u2019s ratepayers are being asked to shoulder the cost of infrastructure investments that the city did not make years ago.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe feel like we\u2019re more than making up for maybe a lack of investment in the past,\u201d Floyd said. \u201cAnd I thought that that was a fair analysis if we look at it cumulatively.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>City officials said holding rates flat would come with its own consequences.<\/p>\n<p>Public Works Administrator Claude Tankersley said the proposal does not add employees or new services. The additional revenue is needed to cover rising costs while maintaining current operations and projects already in the city\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo if we did a zero rate increase this year, we would have to look at how we would reduce those operation costs, and I don\u2019t know how we would do that without having to cut staff, to be honest with you,\u201d Tankersley said.<\/p>\n<p>The utility increase also comes as St. Petersburg prepares to ask voters to pay for another major infrastructure investment.<\/p>\n<p>In November, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/stpetecatalyst.com\/zaps\/council-approves-resilience-general-obligation-bond-language\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">voters will decide whether to allow the city to borrow up to $600 million<\/a> to accelerate projects addressing flooding and the city\u2019s water and sewer systems. The debt would be repaid through property taxes.<\/p>\n<p>Council Member Brandi Gabbard brought a resident\u2019s question about the two proposals to the council discussion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCity Council is going to ask us in November to tax ourselves, but why would we want to do that whenever we\u2019re already getting increases every single year?\u201d Gabbard said.<\/p>\n<p>City officials said the two would pay for different things. Higher utility rates would maintain existing services and keep already-planned projects moving. The November proposal would provide money for additional infrastructure work.<\/p>\n<p>Gabbard said she wanted the distinction discussed publicly so residents could understand why the city says both are necessary.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAt the end of the day, we at least have to maintain what we\u2019re doing today because, to not do this, would mean we would be going backwards,\u201d Gabbard said.<\/p>\n<p>The city has already scaled back one of the proposed increases. Stormwater rates were previously projected to rise 15% next year. The current proposal calls for an 8.5% increase, in part because the city would borrow more for stormwater projects instead of collecting as much money upfront from current customers.<\/p>\n<p>The council did not vote on the rates. The presentation was an update before the proposal returns for a first reading this Thursday (Aug. 13), followed by the public hearing process.<\/p>\n<p>Floyd wants the city to revisit how utility costs are divided before next year\u2019s rate discussion. He has advocated for changes that could benefit residents who conserve water, and for examining whether property taxes could pay for more infrastructure costs, which he said could spread the burden more evenly.<\/p>\n<p>He said the larger concern is what years of increases have collectively required residents to absorb.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWith the amount of increases we\u2019ve had over the last decade, if we looked at that cumulatively, it does look like a really large burden being placed on one generation,\u201d Floyd said.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"St. Petersburg residents could see their monthly utility bills climb by nearly 7% next year, an increase city&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":367783,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[202,204,203,199,201,200],"class_list":["post-367782","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-st-petersburg","tag-st-pete","tag-st-pete-headlines","tag-st-pete-news","tag-st-petersburg","tag-st-petersburg-headlines","tag-st-petersburg-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367782","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=367782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/367782\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/367783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=367782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=367782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=367782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}