\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.wtsp.com\/assets\/shared-images\/icons\/arrow-circle-down.svg\"){kind=icon}
<\/p>\nThe council voted to send the current contract to the Public Services and Infrastructure Committee for review. <\/p>\n
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. \u2014 The St. Petersburg City Council is beginning a broader discussion about the city\u2019s use of Flock license plate-reading cameras, as concerns over privacy and surveillance continue to grow across the Tampa Bay region.<\/p>\n
The council voted Thursday to refer the city\u2019s existing Flock contract to the Public Services and Infrastructure Committee for further discussion.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\n This story continues below.
<\/p>\n
The move was requested by Councilmember Richie Floyd, who said he has concerns about whether the technology\u2019s potential crime-fighting benefits outweigh the privacy risks.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis right here is just like the wild west at this moment,\u201d Floyd said.<\/p>\n
\nWhat are Flock cameras? <\/p>\n
Flock cameras are automated license plate readers that capture images of vehicles and can identify information including license plates, vehicle make, model and color.<\/p>\n
Law enforcement agencies have praised the technology as a tool that can help investigators locate vehicles connected to crimes and identify suspects more quickly.<\/p>\n
But critics say the cameras can also create a record of where law-abiding people travel.<\/p>\n
St. Petersburg has about 50 Flock cameras throughout the city. The city began using the technology through a pilot program in 2022, with its current contract beginning in 2024.<\/p>\n
\nPrivacy concerns <\/p>\n
Floyd said one of his biggest concerns is that the cameras are operated by a private company and that police departments may have limited control over how the collected data is ultimately handled.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe police department released a memo that described how they allowed access to their databases,\u201d Floyd said. \u201cAnd in that memo, it had basically an asterisk that said we cannot control how Flock handles the data.\u201d<\/p>\n
Floyd said reports of alleged misuse of Flock data around the country have also raised concerns about whether the information can be adequately protected.<\/p>\n
\u201cUltimately, it’s a private company doing this surveillance, and that’s really concerning,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Floyd also questioned the lack of a warrant or judicial review required before someone\u2019s movements can potentially be tracked through the system.<\/p>\n
\nResidents push back <\/p>\n
The debate has also sparked protests in St. Petersburg.<\/p>\n
Carl Gunn, who has dubbed himself the \u201cFlock Blocker,\u201d has been spending weekends protesting the cameras and attempting to block their view.<\/p>\n
Gunn said he believes the cameras allow residents\u2019 movements to be tracked throughout the city.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery time I drive by there, which is quite a lot, they got a picture of me and they know where I’m going,\u201d Gunn said.<\/p>\n
A newly formed group, DeFlock St. Pete, has also raised concerns about the amount of information collected by the cameras and what happens to that data.<\/p>\n
\nOther Tampa Bay communities reconsider Flock <\/p>\n
St. Petersburg\u2019s discussion comes as other communities across the Tampa Bay region take steps to reconsider their relationships with Flock.<\/p>\n