A city budget for next year is headed to the full Jacksonville City Council, and it came together without the acrimony that engulfed last year\u2019s budget process.<\/p>\n
Six budget hearings in August came off without last year\u2019s tug of war<\/a> between conservative Republicans and a coalition of moderates, Democrats and the mayor.\u00a0<\/p>\n The process was shrouded, however, by a tax cut proposal on the state ballot in November that, if approved by voters, could cost Jacksonville $300 million in annual tax revenue by 2028<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n The uncertainty prompsed City Council\u2019s Finance Committee to make cuts and accounting moves than dropped $23.4 million from the budget.<\/p>\n If approved, the 2026-27 budget would be the first time since 2012 that the city reduced spending from the previous year. As of Tuesday, the committee\u2019s edited budget is $2.002 billion, just under the $2.003 billion spending package approved last year.<\/p>\n None of the decisions are set in stone. Council members could restore funding, cut more or add spending priorities on budget night. But there were apparent winners and losers coming out of the hearings.\u00a0<\/p>\n Budget winners\u00a0<\/p>\n Jacksonville Sheriff\u2019s Office and Jacksonville Fire and Rescue<\/p>\n Nearly 53%, or $1.07 billion, of Mayor Donna Deegan\u2019s proposed budget was set aside for public safety spending \u2014 a record number for Jacksonville<\/a>. Committee members cut nothing from Sheriff T.K. Water\u2019s $675.9 million budget request and also didn\u2019t touch the $396.4 million for the Jacksonville Fire and Rescue Department.\u00a0<\/p>\n The committee also moved $22.655 million of what it cut from Deegan\u2019s budget into a special public safety contingency fund that could help pay for additional projects, like JSO\u2019s push to consolidate its storage and evidence warehouses into one Downtown location.<\/p>\n Wolfson Children\u2019s Hospital<\/p>\n Finance chair Will Lahne and council President Nick Howland said they wanted no new spending. But the committee did say yes to a nearly $2 million request from Wolfson\u2019s Children\u2019s Hospital to aid the proposed expansion of its Pediatric and Obstetrics and Gynecology Graduate Medical Education Program.\u00a0<\/p>\n Lahnen said Tuesday that the city\u2019s return on investment would exceed the spending.<\/p>\n Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville, which operates Wolfsons, said in 2025 that the $25.8 million project to expand its labor and delivery services was in part to prepare for a rise in high-risk pregnancies<\/a>.<\/p>\n Hogpen Creek homeowners<\/p>\n After years of petitioning the city to do something about sediment buildup and erosion along Hogpen Creek, homeowners who live on the waterway could finally see money put toward finding the root cause of the issue. The committee added $250,000 to the proposed $587 million capital improvement plan for the study.<\/p>\n Ultimately, residents on the creek want the city to dredge the creek to fix chronically low water levels in what was once a free-flowing creek, if the cause is found to be government infrastructure work on or near the waterway. They hope a study gets to the bottom of that. Diamond, who represents the area, promised residents during a town hall in May<\/a> that he would add money into the proposed budget to fund the study.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n James Weldon Johnson Park<\/p>\n Several of the Finance Committee members were hesitant to sign off on $6.75 million for upgrades to James Weldon Johnson Park, the historic public space across from City Hall in the heart of Downtown.\u00a0<\/p>\n Lahnen and others argued that city lawmakers have already approved more than $200 million in the last five years for Downtown\u2019s riverfront park system, and more could be a tough sell to Jacksonville residents who live farther from the urban core.\u00a0<\/p>\n But, on Tuesday, the committee ultimately decided to keep $5 million in the capital plan for demolition, lighting and electrical work, landscaping and irrigation, walkways, security, engineering and ADA compliance for the park redesign.\u00a0<\/p>\n They also set aside $750,000 for next year\u2019s budget to build a stage at the park and put $1 million from the original budget back into city reserves.<\/p>\n Budget losers<\/p>\n Affordable housing advocates<\/p>\n For a second time, it seems unlikely that Deegan\u2019s push to get money for an affordable housing trust fund will make it into the city budget. The mayor included $4.9 million<\/a> in her spending plan to seed a permanent fund to make for-sale, owner-occupied housing more attainable for low-income Jacksonville families.\u00a0<\/p>\n Deegan\u2019s full trust fund proposal was broken down into three parts:\u00a0<\/p>\n $1.5 million for a down payment assistance home-ownership program<\/p>\n $2.4 million for developers to help pay to build attainable housing\u00a0<\/p>\n $1 million to assist with utility tap fees for attainable housing projects<\/p>\n The committee cut those dollars on Day 1<\/a> of the hearings, citing their redline on no new spending. Lahnen said, despite the cut, affordable housing is a priority for council leadership.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThe affordable housing trust is a great example of sticking to our guidance of nothing new. Although it was lumped together in the budget as a single item called affordable housing trust, it was three separate line items, none of which were new, and items that have repeatedly not been put into the budget by the Finance Committee,\u201d Lahnen said.<\/p>\n The $4.9 million for affordable housing was Deegan\u2019s response to a request of the Interfaith Coalition for Action, Reconciliation and Empowerment \u2014 known as ICARE<\/a> \u2014 earlier this year for a $10 million affordable housing trust.<\/p>\n In 2024, council voted down another attempt by Deegan to start a $10 million affordable housing trust<\/a> that would have come with private sector and philanthropic matching dollars.<\/p>\n Last year, council removed $2 million to help developers finance affordable housing projects in Jacksonville, only to add $900,000 of that back<\/a> after pressure from council member Matt Carlucci.<\/p>\n Over the last 12 months, council has approved development loans for individual affordable housing projects, including a 38-unit townhome community<\/a> on Ricker Road and a 240-unit apartment project<\/a> along Beach Boulevard.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cIt was disappointing to see the affordable housing funding removed given that there is such a great need, and citizens tell us this is their top concern,\u201d Deegan\u2019s office said in an email. \u201cWe will work with the full City Council to restore <\/a>this critical funding in September. We also hope that children\u2019s programs will be preserved as the Finance Committee continues to discuss these investments in our city\u2019s future.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Coordination among counties<\/p>\n A majority of the committee voted to eliminate $237,427 that went to pay the city\u2019s membership dues for the Florida Association of Counties, the Florida League of Cities, the National Association of Counties and the National League of Cities.\u00a0<\/p>\n Jacksonville participates in these organizations to share ideas and coordinate with other local and county governments in Florida and the U.S. more broadly. Committee member Rahman Johnson and Randy White voted against the removal.\u00a0<\/p>\n Council member Raul Arias, who is not on the committee, also pushed the committee on Tuesday to reinstate the funding.\u00a0<\/p>\n Mayor\u2019s office budget<\/p>\n For the second year in the row, the committee decided to cut the mayor\u2019s office budget. Historically, the council has allowed mayors to determine how much their office needs for salaries and expenses.\u00a0<\/p>\n The committee voted to reduce Deegan\u2019s executive office budget by $245,376 to about $5.2 million. Lahnen said the drop was to match the salary increase allowed for the Office of the City Council. In 2025, the council cut $631,125 from the mayor\u2019s office.<\/p>\n Lahnen says council \u201cled by example\u201d during the budget hearings by taking about $7.8 million of the council\u2019s annual $10 million in strategic planning funding and moving it into the reserves.<\/p>\n Amendment 3 limbo\u00a0<\/p>\n Cultural Council and public service grants<\/p>\n The Finance Committee decided to hold back some of what the city gives for cultural service and public service grants, telehealth for the uninsured and rental assistance and tie it to the property tax referendum, which is known as Amendment 3.<\/p>\n As a result, the city\u2019s arts, cultural and public service nonprofits will not know until November how much money they\u2019ll have to operate for the next 12 months.\u00a0<\/p>\n The Jacksonville Cultural Council and the Public Service Grants Council will get at least 65% of the funding budgeted by the Deegan administration. The last 35% will be tied to whether Amendment 3 passes.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n That means $7.1 million that would be basically split between cultural and public service grants will be put into the contingency.<\/p>\n Originally, the committee was going to advance a budget funding both councils at only 50% for the year. But pressure from some council members raised that to 65%.<\/p>\n \u201cIf Amendment 3 fails, we still have a year-over-year budget slightly less than last year. If it passes, we have a head start on scaling down to a budget of $200 million less for fiscal year 2027-28, by not approving all of the public service grant and cultural grant funding to be released on Oct. 1,\u201d Lahnen said.<\/p>\n Telehealth and rental assistance<\/p>\n Deegan\u2019s Healthlinks Jax telehealth program for uninsured residents has been a lightning rod for the mayor\u2019s critics on council since it was first approved. Diamond tried to pull funding for what\u2019s billed as an emergency room diversion program last year and investigated it for unproven fraud allegations <\/a>through the council\u2019s DOGE committee earlier this year.<\/p>\n The committee\u2019s edited budget will provide program operator Telescope Health $750,000 of the $1.5 million before the November vote. The other half will be released if the referendum fails.<\/p>\n