{"id":413076,"date":"2026-09-28T19:56:08","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T19:56:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/413076\/"},"modified":"2026-09-28T19:56:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-28T19:56:08","slug":"st-johns-commissioners-deny-two-previously-approved-agricultural-enclave-applications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/413076\/","title":{"rendered":"St. Johns commissioners deny two previously approved agricultural enclave applications"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">ST. JOHNS COUNTY, Fla. \u2013 The St. Johns County Commission voted 3-2 to deny two agricultural enclave applications previously approved Aug. 19, following a debate over whether the properties met Florida\u2019s statutory requirements.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">The applications were identified during the meeting as Heritage East and Heritage West. Commissioner Christian Whitehurst brought them back for a board discussion about how the county was evaluating agricultural enclave requests.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cI wanted to talk about the standards by which we\u2019re evaluating these applications, and so it\u2019s really that I wanted to prompt the discussion between the board while we evaluate the applications based on the letter of the law or by other variables that weren\u2019t mentioned during the meetings and opened up for a board discussion,\u201d Whitehurst said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">A central issue was whether the applications met the statute\u2019s perimeter requirements, including provisions referring to an urban service area or line. County staff said it analyzed the county\u2019s development area boundary as the equivalent of an urban service area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">RELATED | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.news4jax.com\/i-team\/2026\/09\/28\/who-helped-write-sb-686-inside-the-law-reshaping-development-in-st-johns-county\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.news4jax.com\/i-team\/2026\/09\/28\/who-helped-write-sb-686-inside-the-law-reshaping-development-in-st-johns-county\/\">Who helped write SB 686? Inside the law reshaping development in St. Johns County<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Jacob Smith, speaking for county staff, said, \u201cWe did analyze it as our development area boundary as the stand-in for that terminology.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Commissioner Anne Taylor disagreed, saying the development area boundary did not meet the state\u2019s definition of an urban service area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cThe development area boundary is a very general growth management line whereas an urban service area is a very specific designation that the statute specifically defines. So then we cannot treat them the same. They are not the same,\u201d Taylor said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Taylor said the state definition requires an area to be identified in the comprehensive plan, with public facilities and services already in place or identified in the capital improvements element. She questioned where the county had identified and funded specific road, water and sewer projects for the area.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cClearly we don\u2019t have that. We don\u2019t have that,\u201d Taylor said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">The applicants\u2019 attorney, Robert Walters, argued that the properties met the requirements. He said the parcels were undeveloped, owned and controlled by Heritage Development, and had agricultural classifications for at least 10 years. He also said the application met the perimeter requirements and that the applicant had asserted it would negotiate with the county to provide public services.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Walters argued that county staff reached the same conclusion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cStaff went through the application and determined that the two parcels met the requirements of the law and thus demonstrated through competent substantial evidence that all the requirements were met,\u201d Walters said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">He also questioned whether the commission had authority to reconsider the applications and asked the board to uphold the previous approvals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cFor those reasons we go request that the county take no action today and uphold the prior approvals that occurred on August 19 of this year,\u201d Walters said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Residents raised concerns about water supply, traffic, stormwater, roads, schools, emergency services and continued development.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Whitehurst said the board should base its decision on evidence rather than political pressure.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cMy remarks in summary were let\u2019s make our decision based on the evidence, not on politics,\u201d Whitehurst said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">He later thanked Taylor for bringing forward additional research.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">\u201cI appreciate you doing the work of bringing something of substance that I can actually consider,\u201d Whitehurst said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">Taylor responded, \u201cI cannot thank you enough because it took time to look into this even further. And if we did not have that time, we would not be here today.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"sc-dLMFU sc-fHjqPf jbiTJv kYFPaL article-text\">The commission then voted to deny both applications, 3-2.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright 2026 by WJXT News4JAX &#8211; All rights reserved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"ST. JOHNS COUNTY, Fla. \u2013 The St. Johns County Commission voted 3-2 to deny two agricultural enclave applications&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":413077,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[2152,116,118,117,5902],"class_list":["post-413076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-jacksonville","tag-development","tag-jacksonville","tag-jacksonville-headlines","tag-jacksonville-news","tag-st-johns-county"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=413076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413076\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/413077"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=413076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=413076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=413076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}