{"id":52698,"date":"2025-11-19T14:16:15","date_gmt":"2025-11-19T14:16:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/52698\/"},"modified":"2025-11-19T14:16:15","modified_gmt":"2025-11-19T14:16:15","slug":"judge-nixes-growth-law-case-tallahassee-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/52698\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge Nixes Growth Law Case \u2013 Tallahassee Reports"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"fb-share-icon\"<\/a>
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Tweet\"
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

By Jim Turner, The News Service of Florida<\/p>\n

TALLAHASSEE \u2014 An administrative law judge Tuesday rejected Ocoee\u2019s challenge to a decision by the Florida Department of Commerce that changes to a city comprehensive plan were \u201cnull and void\u201d because of a controversial new state law.<\/p>\n

The law, passed during this spring\u2019s legislative session, has drawn criticism from cities and counties throughout Florida and two constitutional challenges in Leon County circuit court.<\/p>\n

Part of the law affects counties included in federal disaster declarations after last year\u2019s hurricanes Debby, Helene and Milton. In part, it bars cities and counties in those areas from approving \u201cmore restrictive or burdensome\u201d changes to comprehensive plans or land-development regulations through Oct. 1, 2027. The prohibition was retroactive to Aug. 1, 2024.<\/p>\n

Cities and counties contend that the law has effectively frozen comprehensive plans, which are designed to serve as blueprints for development and land-use decisions.<\/p>\n

Unlike the lawsuits in circuit court, Ocoee filed its case in September at the Division of Administrative Hearings. It challenged the actions of the Department of Commerce, which oversees land planning in the state and on Aug. 27 turned down the city\u2019s proposed comprehensive plan changes.<\/p>\n

The department said in a letter to the city that it had found conflicts between the revised comprehensive plan and the new state law.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese conflicts render the proposed and adopted comprehensive plan amendment null and void ab initio,\u201d the department said, according to Tuesday\u2019s ruling by Administrative Law Judge E. Gary Early.<\/p>\n

Ocoee contended in the challenge that the department\u2019s interpretation of the law should have gone through a rulemaking process \u2014 and, as a result, was an improper \u201cunadopted rule,\u201d under administrative law. Also, the city argued the department had overstepped its authority, what is known as an \u201cinvalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.\u201d<\/p>\n

But Early rejected the arguments, primarily focusing on the rulemaking issue. He said Ocoee had not shown that the department\u2019s interpretation of the law applied widely to local governments.<\/p>\n

He wrote that \u201cthe issue that is dispositive is whether the correspondence (the letter from the department to Ocoee) espouses an \u2018agency statement of general applicability that implements, interprets, or prescribes law or policy,\u2019 thus meeting the definition of a rule. \u2026 Under the record developed here, it does not.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe only competent, substantial evidence in the record is that the department reviewed the (Ocoee) plan amendment, and identified conflicts between (the law) and policies in the plan amendment, each listed by number,\u201d Early wrote. \u201cBased on its review of the plan amendment, the department, rightly or wrongly, determined the plan amendment to be null and void ab initio.\u201d<\/p>\n

The circuit-court lawsuits were filed by a collection of cities and counties and the growth-management group 1000 Friends of Florida. Judge Angela Dempsey on Friday issued an order consolidating the cases.<\/p>\n

\"fb-share-icon\"<\/a>
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Tweet\"
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>
\n\t\t\t\t