{"id":55295,"date":"2025-11-21T09:55:09","date_gmt":"2025-11-21T09:55:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/55295\/"},"modified":"2025-11-21T09:55:09","modified_gmt":"2025-11-21T09:55:09","slug":"tossing-damages-in-florida-hospital-case-shakes-faith-in-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/55295\/","title":{"rendered":"Tossing Damages in Florida Hospital Case Shakes Faith in Justice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When a Florida jury awarded the Kowalski family a verdict exceeding $231 million, it wasn\u2019t simply awarding damages. It was affirming a foundational promise of the US justice system that ordinary citizens can hold powerful institutions accountable when their choices destroy lives. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/11\/10\/us\/take-care-of-maya-trial-damages-kowalski.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><\/p>\n<p>The promise became more fragile when Florida\u2019s Second District Court of Appeal <a data-terminal-id=\"T4Y9YOGQ1Z24\" href=\"https:\/\/news.bloomberglaw.com\/litigation\/florida-hospital-wins-relief-in-suit-over-child-abuse-reporting\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reversed<\/a> that verdict\u2014already <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wusf.org\/courts-law\/2024-01-19\/take-care-of-maya-case-judgment-lowered-motion-retrial-dismissed\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reduced<\/a> $47.5 million\u2014and ordered a new trial. <\/p>\n<p>The court held that Johns Hopkins All Children\u2019s Hospital was protected by statutory immunity under Chapter 39 of the Florida <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flcourts.gov\/content\/download\/868075\/file\/Chapter%2039%202022-10-24.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">statutes<\/a> for reporting suspected child abuse, and that the jury shouldn\u2019t have heard the testimony about the restrictive orders imposed by a dependency court once the child involved was removed from her parents\u2019 custody. <\/p>\n<p>In the appellate court\u2019s view, the hospital acted in \u201cgood faith,\u201d and the jury\u2019s understanding of the family\u2019s suffering was tainted by context the judges say should have been excluded. This approach elevates procedure over people and turns good faith from a safeguard into a shield so broad it swallows accountability.<\/p>\n<p>We all agree health-care providers must be able to report suspected abuse; that protection saves lives. But immunity only exists when actions are taken in \u201cgood faith&#8221;\u2014a boundary the state legislature drew intentionally to prevent exactly the kind of unchecked institutional power this case spotlights. Under this ruling, the moment a report is made, nearly every subsequent act can be cloaked in immunity, no matter how harmful.<\/p>\n<p>That isn\u2019t a safety net. It\u2019s a blank check. And if that becomes the legal norm, families lose far more than rights. They lose trust in the very institutions they turn in crisis.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the reality beneath the legal theory: When parents bring a medically fragile child to a hospital and suspicion enters the room, they can suddenly lose control not just over medical decisions, but over their family\u2019s future. That should concern every Floridian and every American who has ever sought help for a child and expected support, not suspicion.<\/p>\n<p>Beata Kowalski was a nurse infusionist\u2014a mother who understood medicine and advocated fiercely for her daughter. When the system decided she was the problem, the presumption of parental love evaporated. Her daughter, Maya, was separated from the family for 87 days. Beata died by suicide under the weight of terror, grief, and helplessness. No appellate opinion can soften that truth, and no statute should erase it.<\/p>\n<p>This ruling risks importing into medicine the same dynamic qualified immunity created in policing: A doctrine meant to protect responsible professionals expanding, case by case, into armor against accountability. Trust in public institutions isn\u2019t strengthened by shielding their conduct from scrutiny; it\u2019s destroyed by it.<\/p>\n<p>This isn\u2019t an attack on child protection. It\u2019s a demand that protection doesn\u2019t morph into unchecked power. We can defend children and still defend due process. We can support doctors and social workers without turning families into suspects simply because they sought care.<\/p>\n<p>A jury heard weeks of testimony and reached a unanimous verdict. The appellate court didn\u2019t say the jury got the facts wrong\u2014only that jurors saw the consequences of the hospital\u2019s decisions. But consequences aren\u2019t prejudicial. They are the case. Shielding jurors from the human impact of institutional choices isn\u2019t neutrality. It\u2019s erasure.<\/p>\n<p>If jurors can decide on life and liberty, they can be trusted to hear the full story of how a family was shattered. Sanitizing harm isn\u2019t justice\u2014it\u2019s insulation. And when courts begin insulating institutions from accountability, families notice. Cynicism grows. Trust fractures. The system we rely on to protect us begins to look like one designed to protect only itself.<\/p>\n<p>Appellate review exists to safeguard fairness, not to reset the scoreboard when juries reach uncomfortable truths. If the concern was evidentiary nuance, narrower remedies existed. Instead, years of litigation and a clear jury verdict were swept aside not because the facts changed, but because process was elevated above truth.<\/p>\n<p>If \u201cgood faith\u201d becomes presumed rather than proven, we replace judgment with deference and juries with doctrine. That isn\u2019t how a constitutional system functions. The jury isn\u2019t symbolic; it\u2019s the heartbeat of accountability.<\/p>\n<p>This decision sends a dangerous message: Accountability is welcome until it becomes inconvenient. And in cases where families face institutional power, that message lands loudly and painfully.<\/p>\n<p>The Florida Supreme Court should review this case. \u201cGood faith\u201d must mean real good faith, proven on evidence, not a reflexive assumption. Immunity must stay narrow. And juries must remain central in evaluating institutions entrusted with life-altering authority.<\/p>\n<p>A mother sought help and never returned home. A child endured isolation no family should face. A jury spoke. That voice shouldn\u2019t be silenced by a preference for procedural neatness over lived human truth.<\/p>\n<p>Our justice system exists to protect the vulnerable and restrain the powerful. When it forgets that mission, families pay the price. The appellate ruling may have paused accountability, but it didn\u2019t extinguish it. The work of restoring balance, dignity, and genuine good faith continues.<\/p>\n<p>The case is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberglaw.com\/public\/document\/JohnsHopkinsAllChildsHospIncvKowalskiNo2D202403822025BL387823Fla2?doc_id=XDLU8DPG000N\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Johns Hopkins All Children\u2019s Hosp. v. Kowalski<\/a>, Fla. Dist. Ct. App., 2d Dist., No. 2D2024-0382, 10\/29\/25.<\/p>\n<p>This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law, Bloomberg Tax, and Bloomberg Government, or its owners.<\/p>\n<p>Author Information<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbglaw.com\/attorneys\/sean-domnick\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sean C. Domnick<\/a> is shareholder at Rafferty Domnick Cunningham &amp; Yaffa.<\/p>\n<p>Write for Us: <a href=\"https:\/\/pro.bloomberglaw.com\/author-guidelines\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Author Guidelines<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"When a Florida jury awarded the Kowalski family a verdict exceeding $231 million, it wasn\u2019t simply awarding damages.&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":55296,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[34471,10909,34470,34469,34472,28,30,29,10116,1106,34468,34473,34467],"class_list":["post-55295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-florida","tag-child-abuse-and-neglect","tag-child-custody","tag-criminal-evidence","tag-damages","tag-due-process","tag-florida","tag-florida-headlines","tag-florida-news","tag-hospitals","tag-juries","tag-nurses","tag-physicians","tag-qualified-immunity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55295\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-fl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}