On Nov. 3, 2025, after one of the most closely watched municipal races in decades, Zohran Mamdani was elected as the new mayor of New York City, marking a historic moment in how the United States imagines leadership and representation in the 21st century. The announcement came just after midnight at his campaign headquarters in Queens, where chants in Urdu, Arabic, Spanish and English echoed beneath the elevated 7 train. Supporters waved handmade signs reading “Freeze the Rent” and “A City Where Everyone Belongs.” For many, the victory felt less like a political win and more like a long-overdue recognition – a moment when New York finally sounded like itself.
Mamdani’s election marks a profound change in the American urban story. For communities once confined to the edges of civic life, often surveilled and sidelined in policymaking, his win transforms belonging into authorship. The question is no longer whether Muslims can live in American cities, but how they will shape and govern them. As housing costs continue to spiral and inequality deepens, Mamdani’s pledge to make affordability and dignity the central measures of governance stands as both a manifesto and a moral test.
“I am not afraid of my own ideas,” Mamdani told The New Yorker last month, a declaration that now reads like a promise to the city itself.
Today, the moment recalls the ideas of Mahmood Mamdani, a political theorist at Columbia University and father of the new mayor. In his seminal book Citizen and Subject, he argued that postcolonial societies failed when they produced subjects instead of citizens, when people were governed but not represented. His son’s election reverses that pattern in an urban context: Muslims in New York are no longer a managed population but founders of civic order. Yet what Mamdani inherits is a city where the ideals of citizenship collide daily with the material limits of urban life.
Five fault lines
Mamdani now faces not one but five interlocking crises: housing, transit, infrastructure, migration and climate.
The housing crisis has long been tightening around New York’s core. The median rent now exceeds $3,600, and more than 150,000 students experience homelessness each year. The city’s $116 billion budget continues to be strained between law enforcement and social care. Even middle-income families are now considering leaving Brooklyn.
The transit system shows chronic fatigue, aging subway lines, delayed maintenance and repeated breakdowns across a network that carries 5 million passengers a day. The infrastructure, especially water and sewer systems, has been awaiting renewal since Hurricane Sandy; parts of Manhattan’s network still date back to the nineteenth century.
Meanwhile, a growing wave of migrants continues to stretch the city’s budget and social services. In the first nine months of 2025 alone, over 150,000 new arrivals sought shelter assistance. Above all, the climate pressure is reshaping the city’s geography: rising sea levels, recurring floods and intense summer heat waves are pushing New York closer to its limits of sustainability.
Together, these pressures form five fault lines beneath the city, cracks that expose how deeply social inequality, economic neglect and environmental strain now intersect.
What lies before Mamdani is not a change of administration but a call for reconstruction. His campaign pledges, rent freezes, free buses and public care are no longer slogans; they are urgent interventions for a city struggling to restore social fairness and everyday dignity. Today, New York must decide not simply who governs it, but how it will be repaired. Delivering these promises will also mean navigating New York’s complex machinery, from the Rent Guidelines Board and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) to Albany’s control over housing and infrastructure funding.
The methods Mamdani develops to confront these crises could redefine urban governance far beyond New York. His approach may well set a precedent for other American mayors, one rooted not in political rhetoric but in an urban engineer’s perspective, where infrastructure, social resilience and human dignity become the true measures of progress.
Public excellence to govern
For Mamdani, governance means not maintaining bureaucracy but redefining public excellence. A city, he argues, survives not through budgets alone but through the discipline of urban maintenance, from garbage collection and daycare access to subway reliability and water main repair; every detail reflects the quality of public life.
This approach aligns closely with the work of Nik Theodore, professor of urban planning and policy at the University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), whose concept of urban precarity captures the instability defining contemporary cities. As Theodore observes, the crisis of modern urban life is not only poverty but instability, the erosion of security in work, housing and migration. Mamdani’s vision of “a city where everyone belongs” directly responds to that condition, placing invisible workers, migrants and caregivers back at the center of the urban narrative. During the campaign, he often stressed a simple discipline: the city teaches humility; you can’t repair what you refuse to hear. That humility, the ability to listen before designing, may prove to be Mamdani’s most radical tool of governance.
In this sense, Mamdani’s mayoralty could become less an administrative office than a laboratory of civic ethics. A rent freeze is not merely an economic measure but the restoration of dignity; free bus service is not welfare but the practice of equality. If successful, New York could emerge not just as a repaired city but as a new model of democracy, the beginning of a governing era in which solidarity becomes the city’s very infrastructure of survival.
Rethinking urban citizenship
For many Muslim New Yorkers, Zohran Mamdani’s victory is more than representation; it’s a blueprint for shared civic renewal. Mamdani’s mayoralty in New York is not just a political milestone; it is an invitation for American cities to look into their own mirror. His election shifts the question from identity to reconstruction, from who belongs to how belonging is built. The visibility of migrants, tenants, caregivers and working-class neighborhoods now forms the foundation of a renewed civic imagination.
Mamdani’s story reminds America’s fragile cities of a simple truth: a city is not a mechanism to be managed but a common life to be shared. This perspective could spread from Chicago to Los Angeles, from Detroit to Houston, reshaping the national conversation. As cities like Chicago wrestle with disinvestment and housing segregation, the question is no longer “who will win” but “who will live together.” And to show how we might live together, Mamdani must approach the city through an urban engineer’s perspective, one that unites technical precision with social compassion.
If Mamdani can realize his vision of public transformation, the discourse on American urbanism may shift profoundly. New York would then be remembered not only for its skyline but for its new urban paradigms and active solutions. And in the end, Mamdani’s New York should remind us of this: Citizenship is not a status, but a responsibility we build together.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance, values or position of Daily Sabah. The newspaper provides space for diverse perspectives as part of its commitment to open and informed public discussion.
The Daily Sabah Newsletter
Keep up to date with what’s happening in Turkey,
it’s region and the world.
SIGN ME UP
You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.