Photo: Leigh Vogel/Getty Images
Bari Weiss is long past her supposed free speech era. The Free Press founder and CBS News editor-in-chief recently yanked a 60 Minutes segment from the air detailing horrific conditions in CECOT, the El Salvadoran prison to which Donald Trump has been deporting Venezuelan immigrants. Sharyn Alfonsi, the segment’s correspondent, said in an email to colleagues that she learned Saturday that Weiss had spiked the story after Trump officials declined to be interviewed.
It didn’t matter that the story was factually correct and had undergone a legal review. The timing made it appear that was Weiss was covering for her boss, David Ellison, who along with his father, Larry, controls CBS’s parent company, Paramount Skydance. The Ellisons, who are among the very richest men in the world, purchased Paramount earlier this year and are now after an even bigger fish: They are hoping Trump wields his antitrust power to scuttle Netflix’s purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery and allows Paramount, instead, to consume WB, creating a new entertainment-and-media juggernaut. The Ellisons, who also bought The Free Press and installed Weiss as the head of CBS News, are not yet on Trump’s good side, though. He is still fuming about 60 Minutes and how it’s still not sycophantic toward him — not in the way he’d like. It pursues, even under the Ellisons, the watchdog journalism it’s known for.
How long that will last is anyone’s guess. Weiss, who was made extremely wealthy by Paramount’s purchase of The Free Press, has demonstrated, repeatedly, that her professed commitment to free speech and heterodox thought is mostly nonexistent once money, power, or her own political obsessions become part of the equation. An unabashed Israel hawk, she has championed clamping down on the speech rights of the pro-Palestine left; these days, she barely tolerates opposition to Trump. She is not an especially deep thinker. But she is an adept mogul. She knows how to play the Hollywood game. Since departing the New York Times more than a half decade ago, she’s hardly made a wrong move.
CBS could be her Waterloo. Saving broadcast TV in the cord-cutting era would be hard for any executive, and Weiss has yet to prove herself an innovator. There’s no grand digital strategy at CBS, and her early moves, like a town hall for Erika Kirk have been a flop. CBS lacks a clear identity. Making it MAGA-flavored will alienate its core audience while failing to attract conservatives, who will still prefer Fox News. There is no obvious demand for a news network that is not overtly right wing but also seeks to curry favor with Trump. The news organizations that prize their independence, like the New York Times, have fared well in the Trump era. He is an unpopular president, and most news consumers simply aren’t hunting for MAGA propaganda.
There are many valid reasons to bemoan the fractured media landscape and the inability of reliable news organizations to reach Americans like they once did. Yet it’s easy, in the wake of Weiss strangling of 60 Minutes, to see an upside: Since corporate media is less powerful than it once was, it’s far harder for a strongman president like Trump to control the flow of information. The spiked segment spread across the internet anyway. Even if Trump, the Ellisons, and Weiss succeed in transforming CBS News into a network that is overly deferential to the White House, there will be many other competitor outlets, along with social media, to disseminate a counternarrative. And it’s not entirely clear CBS will go this way. Weiss and her boss may come to understand, as with Disney’s decision to temporarily suspend Jimmy Kimmel, that capitulating to the president is a poor public-relations strategy. Disney, under fire, eventually brought Kimmel back, and now he has a new contract. The spiked 60 Minutes segment will probably air in the U.S. eventually. If, however, Weiss and Ellison continue to weaken a famed journalistic institution, they will find themselves with even less credibility and, likely, with less money. Once trust with an audience is broken, it’s very difficult to get it back.
For Weiss, a larger challenge looms: her market, or how she imagines dominating a battle for the attention and dollars of an audience. She was highly successful building out The Free Press, which began as a Substack exploiting a particular market inefficiency. In the early 2020s, social-justice or woke politics was far more dominant, and there were a large number of disaffected centrists and liberals who hungered for a news outlet and commentary site that bent rightward on culture but didn’t seem explicitly MAGA. Now anti-woke has won — it is effectively the law of the land — and those liberals who might have been alienated from woke are far more unsettled by Trump. There are plenty of people who are anti-woke and left-leaning; there are far fewer people who would describe themselves that way and claim any sympathy for Trump.
Weiss is now in a very lonely place: operating a major news outlet that is attempting to placate a president few Americans, beyond hard-core Republicans, now like. Maybe Weiss can chart a path forward; she was counted out when she quit the New York Times, and look at her now. Maybe she knows how to make CBS great again. More likely, though, is that she’s finally found a challenge she can’t really meet. She’s out of ideas.
Sign Up for the Intelligencer Newsletter
Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.
Vox Media, LLC Terms and Privacy Notice