The Manhattan district attorney\u2019s office secured a partial victory on Monday when a state judge ruled that a gun and notebook found inside Luigi Mangione\u2019s backpack could be used as evidence during his murder trial in September.<\/p>\n
Inside of the notebook was what prosecutors have called a manifesto decrying America\u2019s \u201cparasitic\u201d insurance industry and its system of for-profit health care. And the gun, prosecutors have said, was connected to shell casings found at the scene of the killing. The judge, however, ruled that some other evidence from the backpack and some statements could not be used.<\/p>\n
Among the items that will be excluded are a gun magazine, a cellphone, a passport, a wallet and a computer chip, Justice Gregory Carro of State Supreme Court in Manhattan said. In court, Justice Carro said he found that the search of the backpack at a McDonald\u2019s in Pennsylvania where Mr. Mangione was arrested had been \u201can improper, warrantless search.\u201d<\/p>\n
Justice Carro said that only some of the statements made by Mr. Mangione on the day of his arrest, Dec. 9, 2024, would be allowed.<\/p>\n
A hush fell over the courtroom shortly before 10 a.m., as the judge\u2019s written decision was released. Some of Mr. Mangione\u2019s supporters, seated alongside the press, appeared thrilled at the decision. \u201cOh my god, yes,\u201d a woman whispered to another, touching her palm to her chest over her heart.<\/p>\n
The decision came after prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney\u2019s office spent three weeks in December arguing that evidence found in Mr. Mangione\u2019s backpack \u2014 ammunition, a homemade silencer, a red notebook, handwritten notes and a 3-D-printed gun \u2014 should all be allowed into a trial.<\/p>\n
Mr. Mangione\u2019s lawyers said that since the officers who arrested him did not have a warrant to search the backpack that the evidence found inside it was obtained illegally. The police also failed to read Mr. Mangione his Miranda rights and ignored his request to remain silent by continuing to ask him questions, his lawyers said.<\/p>\n
On Monday, Doug Cohen, a spokesman for the Manhattan district attorney, said the office looked \u201cforward to presenting our case at trial on September 8.\u201d<\/p>\n
For prosecutors, the ruling followed a victory earlier this year when Justice Carro moved Mr. Mangione\u2019s state trial date to begin before his federal trial. Mr. Mangione has called the two prosecutions \u201cthe same trial twice.\u201d<\/p>\n
Mr. Mangione is accused of killing Brian Thompson<\/a>, the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare, as Mr. Thompson walked into a Midtown hotel to prepare for an investor conference on the morning of Dec. 4, 2024. Surveillance footage showed that as Mr. Thompson walked toward the hotel\u2019s entrance, a man in a hoodie emerged from between parked cars, leveled a handgun affixed with a silencer and fired.<\/p>\n The killing and the brazen way it was conducted shocked many Americans. But some rallied around the gunman, viewing the killing as a manifestation of Americans\u2019 frustration with rising health care costs. Law enforcement agencies in New York launched a nationwide manhunt.<\/p>\n Five days later, officers in Altoona, Pa., arrested Mr. Mangione in a McDonald\u2019s in connection with the killing.<\/p>\n The focus of the ruling on Monday was what happened in the minutes after Altoona officers approached Mr. Mangione, as he sat with a steak, egg and cheese McMuffin and a Hash Brown, scrolling on a laptop. His black backpack sat on the floor next to him.<\/p>\n Within a half-hour, after he had given the officers a fake driver\u2019s license, the police handcuffed Mr. Mangione. As he was led outside, body camera footage shows two officers searching the bag on a table. They pulled out a sandwich, a bag of sliced bread and an ammunition magazine wrapped in wet underwear.<\/p>\n Officers searched the backpack again at the Altoona police station, where one officer announced that she had found a handgun, according to body camera footage. A supervisor instructed her to move the bag away from where Mr. Mangione was being processed and into a hallway. The officer then began pulling out more items, including the silencer. The police later searched the bag for a third time.<\/p>\n In court last year, Mr. Mangione\u2019s lawyers pointed to moments when officers were recorded in body camera footage asking colleagues if they should get a warrant before rifling through the backpack. Altoona officers, who were called to testify, defended their actions, testifying they followed Pennsylvania law and their department\u2019s policies.<\/p>\n Beyond what was found in the backpack, prosecutors have said they have collected hundreds of hours of video tracking the gunman\u2019s path \u2014 and another discarded backpack that contained a piece of chewed gum \u2014 and have linked Mr. Mangione\u2019s DNA to items the gunman discarded during his flight after the shooting.<\/p>\n They have a flash drive that was on a necklace that Mr. Mangione wore when he was arrested. And there is the fake New Jersey license that Mr. Mangione gave officers, which prosecutors say matches one used at an Upper West Side hostel where the gunman is believed to have stayed.<\/p>\n The Manhattan district attorney\u2019s office charged Mr. Mangione with 11 counts, including murder and terrorism. Days later, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York charged him on four counts. He also faces charges in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n Since then, both cases in New York have narrowed. In Manhattan federal court, Mr. Mangione had faced a charge that carried a potential death penalty, which the judge later dismissed<\/a>.<\/p>\n