{"id":257562,"date":"2026-06-06T15:32:43","date_gmt":"2026-06-06T15:32:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/257562\/"},"modified":"2026-06-06T15:32:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-06T15:32:43","slug":"ny-lawmakers-vote-to-ban-surveillance-pricing-but-digital-price-tags-survive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/257562\/","title":{"rendered":"NY lawmakers vote to ban \u2018surveillance pricing,\u2019 but digital price tags survive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-block-key=\"t95p8\">Businesses would be prohibited from using personal data to tailor prices to individual customers in New York under a newly passed bill meant to crack down on a practice critics have called \u201csurveillance pricing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"6icj2\">The state Assembly, however, declined to vote on <a href=\"https:\/\/gothamist.com\/news\/ag-james-dems-want-to-ban-prices-based-on-personal-algorithms\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">companion legislation that would\u2019ve also banned electronic price labels<\/a> from the shelves of grocery stores and pharmacies, a measure pushed by labor unions who contend the technology can be used to instantly hike prices and reduce the stores\u2019 workforce.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"48qrc\">Grocery stores, business groups and delivery services including Instacart lobbied hard against the measures, arguing they will lead to price increases and could complicate customer loyalty programs. The stores dismissed concerns about the digital price tags, insisting they\u2019re used only as a matter of technological convenience over the traditional method of changing shelf labels by hand.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"9k1ti\">But lawmakers decided to proceed with the ban on pricing using algorithms that use personal data to set different prices for different customers, with supporters arguing it can be used to squeeze more money out of consumers without them even realizing it.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"2f1l7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/assembly.state.ny.us\/leg\/?default_fld=&amp;leg_video=&amp;bn=A09349&amp;term=2025&amp;Summary=Y&amp;Memo=Y&amp;Text=Y\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">The Legislature approved the bill<\/a> late Thursday before ending their annual session. It will be up to Gov. Kathy Hochul whether to sign it into law.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"23vb7\">\u201cWe&#8217;re not trying to capture loyalty programs and legitimate discounts, etc.,\u201d said state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, a Yonkers Democrat. \u201cBut we are concerned about a practice that would just give different prices to different people based on \u2014 what? We&#8217;re not sure.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"6ov7e\">The bill banning \u201csurveillance pricing\u201d would apply to most businesses and service providers in New York, with some exceptions. It would not apply to insurance companies, while banks would still be able to assess a customer\u2019s credit before offering terms for a loan or similar financial service.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"delum\">\u201cA price should be set based on supply, demand, what the market can bear \u2014 not your personal data,\u201d said Assemblymember Emerita Torres, a Bronx Democrat who sponsored one of the bills. \u201cThat&#8217;s what this bill is all about.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"33u4f\">The bill includes language meant to protect loyalty programs, such as a grocery store that offers rewards for returning customers. The protections apply when customers affirmatively enroll in the program and allow for discounts based on their past purchase history \u2014 provided no other personal data is used.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"7pif9\">State Attorney General Letitia James\u2019 office, a <a href=\"https:\/\/gothamist.com\/news\/ag-james-dems-want-to-ban-prices-based-on-personal-algorithms\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">major supporter of the bills<\/a>, says the protections ensure most loyalty programs can remain intact. James\u2019 office would largely be in charge of enforcing the bills should they become law. A first violation would carry a fine of up to $5,000 plus restitution to customers; each subsequent violation would carry an up-to-$20,000 fine.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"eifpq\">Business groups say the protections don\u2019t go nearly far enough and could harm some loyalty programs because of how the bill is written. The legislation requires discounts to be offered \u201cuniformly\u201d to customers who are eligible.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"1r85t\">Mike Durant, president and CEO of the Food Industry Alliance of NYS, said the bills need more \u201cclarity and specificity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"8nvkh\">\u201cUltimately, our members \u2026 are hesitant, and they&#8217;re saying the way the bill is crafted, they will not offer loyalty or reward programs anymore,\u201d said Durant, whose group represents the state\u2019s grocery stores.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"63vue\">The bills would allow \u201cjust for you\u201d coupons based on items a family frequently purchases, according to a memo distributed to lawmakers by James\u2019 office. They would not allow a discount, however, to entice a customer to complete a purchase after an item is placed in their cart.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"3aj5l\">Despite the Attorney General\u2019s Office assurances, the Business Council \u2014 the state\u2019s largest business lobby \u2014 contends the bills will effectively eliminate some discount programs.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"7dl0v\">\u201cIt\u2019s important for the public to understand that these discounts are not disappearing because businesses chose to end them, but because the Legislature is banning them,\u201d said Chelsea Lemon, the organization\u2019s senior director of public affairs.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"cdabk\">Assemblymember Torres said that\u2019s \u201cnot true.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"b2dr2\">Businesses \u201ccan offer legitimate discounts and the bill clearly allows it,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/EmeritaTorresNY\/status\/2062886246880248066\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">she said on X<\/a>, the social-media platform. \u201cWhat corporations can\u2019t do is use your personal data to set prices or find your max price, then throw a \u2018discount\u2019 on it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"embsn\">Among the major supporters of the bills was the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. In particular, the union pushed for the proposed ban on electronic shelf labels that failed to get an Assembly vote.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"edan8\">The small, digital displays \u2014 in use at large chains like Walmart and Aldi \u2014 show the price of the product on the shelf, replacing traditional printed price tags. The union argues the digital tags can be used to instantly change prices and potentially implement surveillance pricing \u2014 and that they put union members out of work.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"9r63d\">\u201cElectronic shelf labels are a tool for price gouging Americans \u2013 full stop \u2013 and tech companies market it as such repeatedly,\u201d union vice president Ademola Oyefeso said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"1os3j\">But business groups say that\u2019s not the case. Opponents of the ban parked a truck with a digital screen outside the state Capitol in recent days, using it as a billboard to liken traditional paper price tags to outdated things like carrier pigeons and a telegraph.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"dabpn\">The Senate approved the digital price tag ban twice \u2014 once earlier this year, and again on Thursday after the bill was amended.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"66u5v\">Senate Deputy Majority Leader Michael Gianaris, a Queens Democrat who sponsored the bill, said lawmakers were trying to regulate an emerging technology.<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"bcbuu\">\u201cThis is a particularly dangerous one and a creepy one, where your personal data is being used to set a price specific to you,\u201d he said Thursday \u201cSo I think most people, if they knew that was happening, would oppose it, and if they knew we had a chance to do something about it, would support what we&#8217;re doing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-block-key=\"eoppt\">Hochul has until the end of the year to sign or veto the pricing bill that passed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Businesses would be prohibited from using personal data to tailor prices to individual customers in New York under&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":257563,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36],"tags":[98,100,99,9,24,63],"class_list":["post-257562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-brooklyn","tag-brooklyn","tag-brooklyn-headlines","tag-brooklyn-news","tag-new-york","tag-new-york-city","tag-nyc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257562\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/257563"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}