{"id":289357,"date":"2026-07-07T17:25:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-07T17:25:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/289357\/"},"modified":"2026-07-07T17:25:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T17:25:10","slug":"businesses-fear-politicization-as-trump-gains-more-power-over-u-s-agencies-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/289357\/","title":{"rendered":"Businesses Fear Politicization as Trump Gains More Power Over U.S. Agencies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Companies are bracing for the fallout of a decision by the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/06\/29\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-independent-regulator-firings.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Supreme Court<\/a> last week that allows the president to fire members of federal regulatory boards for any reason, stripping those regulators of their independence from the White House.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The decision has implications for more than a dozen agencies that oversee power companies, railways, investment banks, labor disputes and the biggest technology companies. Now, corporate executives and lawyers are grappling with the potential for these agencies \u2014 which set the rules and enforce them \u2014 to become even more political.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The decision \u201cenables a lot more mischief,\u201d said Douglas Melamed, a former general counsel at the chip maker Intel and a former senior official at the Justice Department. \u201cThe president is totally free to micromanage things and really squeeze these agencies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The ruling adds to the unpredictability of doing business in the United States, where regulation has heavily depended on which party is in power. Republicans tended to loosen the rules, while Democrats tended to add restrictions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Under the Biden administration, for example, regulators limited drilling on public lands, banned noncompete agreements and sued Adobe and Live Nation, arguing that the companies broke antitrust and consumer protection laws. After President Trump took office a second time, his appointees quickly reversed or abandoned those decisions and settled those lawsuits.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">These policy swings tended to be moderated by the federal agencies, which have long held bipartisan leadership. And federal law forbade the president to fire the regulators without cause.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Now more volatile policy-making could lie ahead as a result of the <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2026\/06\/29\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-decision-trump-presidential-power-slaughter.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">court decision<\/a>, former corporate executives, former regulators and legal experts warned. Many companies plan for expansions and investments years in advance, and regulatory uncertainty often stifles growth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">\u201cStability is the most important thing,\u201d said Samuel J. Palmisano, a former chief executive of IBM and now a board member of a venture fund, America\u2019s Frontier Fund. The decision \u201cwill slow down innovation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The independent agencies affected by the court\u2019s decision include the Federal Trade Commission, which works to protect consumers from practices like deceptive advertising or those harmful to competition; the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which oversees interstate power lines, natural gas operations and regional power grid operators; the Surface Transportation Board, which regulates railroad rates; and the National Labor Relations Board, which resolves disputes between employees and employers.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Commissioners leading the agencies \u2014 traditionally a mix of Republicans and Democrats \u2014 are appointed by the president. In 1935, the Supreme Court <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/295\/602\/\" title=\"\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">ruled<\/a> that the president could not fire the regulators over political or policy differences.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">That held until last year, when Mr. Trump dismissed Democratic commissioners at agencies including the Federal Trade Commission, the National Labor Relations Board and the Surface Transportation Board.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/03\/18\/technology\/trump-ftc-fires-democrats.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">fired F.T.C. member<\/a>, took her case to the Supreme Court, saying she had been wrongfully terminated. The court ruled against her last week.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">A spokesman for the F.T.C., Joe Simonson, said the agency offered \u201cclarity for the business community that was under assault by the previous administration\u2019s left-wing ideologues.\u201d He added, \u201cThere is nothing novel about President Trump\u2019s position as the rightful leader of the executive branch, which the court affirmed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Updated\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>July 7, 2026, 12:37 p.m. ET<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Some regulatory experts and corporate advisers said it was unclear how much \u2014 if at all \u2014 the ruling might shift the agencies\u2019 political agendas. Even when independent, most regulators adhered to the White House\u2019s policies, they said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">\u201cThe notion that Slaughter is a big deal because it gives the president more composed power over the policy agenda is exaggerated,\u201d said Joseph Grundfest, who was a commissioner at the Securities and Exchange Commission in the 1980s and is now a law and business professor at Stanford.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">But the agencies have traditionally ignored politics when taking legal action, he said. The White House could now assert greater control over decisions like whether to sue a company over insider trading.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Companies are trying to plan ahead, said Matthew L. Schwartz, the chairman of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">\u201cThey\u2019re doing what smart people and smart companies do, which is solicit input from a lot of knowledgeable people about what might be coming around the corner so they can try and do some contingency planning,\u201d said Mr. Schwartz, who has represented companies including the fantasy sports app DraftKings and the insurer AIG.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The president\u2019s new ability to remove decision makers at federal agencies could lead to big changes in crucial sectors of the economy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Two freight rail companies, Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, last year proposed a merger that would create the nation\u2019s first single network connecting the East and West coasts, a deal that requires approval by the Surface Transportation Board. Last year, Mr. Trump <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/08\/28\/business\/trump-robert-primus-stb-board-fired.html\" title=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">fired<\/a> Robert E. Primus, a board member who had voted against another big rail merger in 2023.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">With Mr. Primus\u2019s removal, Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern may have a better chance of getting the board to approve their merger, some rail analysts have said. A spokeswoman for the board declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Some consumer advocacy groups are concerned about the potential impact of a partisan Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on energy prices.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">\u201cFERC has really been through Republican and Democratic administrations and really worked hard to be nonpartisan,\u201d said Tyson Slocum, the director of the energy program at Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group. \u201cWhat the Supreme Court has done is toss that aside.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">The ruling also has implications for companies with business before the N.L.R.B., which includes adjudicating labor practice cases and recognizing new unions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">If the agency loses \u2014 or even appears to lose \u2014 its political independence, or seems beholden to the president, unions and companies will be less trusting of its rulings, labor experts said. State labor agencies may try to step in to fill the void, which could create a patchwork of conflicting rules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Companies have already scrambled over the past year and a half to curry favor with the Trump administration. Mr. Trump\u2019s new power to fire regulators who don\u2019t align with him may accelerate that, corporate experts said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">Many companies have already sought out connections with Mr. Trump\u2019s inner circle or made donations to his inauguration, his library or other pet projects, said Jill Zuckman, a partner at SKDK, a public affairs firm.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-140ip4z e1me5xab0\">\u201cIt\u2019s going to supercharge what a lot of companies have been doing,\u201d said Ms. Zuckman, who represents tech and transportation companies and worked for the Obama administration.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-f3337s erlrjdy0\">Reporting was contributed by Ivan Penn from Los Angeles, Jordyn Holman from Chicago, and Peter Eavis, Lauren Hirsch and Rebecca Davis O\u2019Brien from New York.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Companies are bracing for the fallout of a decision by the Supreme Court last week that allows the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":289334,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[88537,34858,1452,110603,4331,3532,9,24,63,81499,122,124,123,99112,30483,108067,1069,1876],"class_list":["post-289357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-queens","tag-antitrust-laws-and-competition-issues","tag-corporations","tag-donald-j","tag-federal-energy-regulatory-commission","tag-federal-trade-commission","tag-national-labor-relations-board","tag-new-york","tag-new-york-city","tag-nyc","tag-organized-labor","tag-queens","tag-queens-headlines","tag-queens-news","tag-rebecca","tag-regulation-and-deregulation-of-industry","tag-slaughter","tag-trump","tag-united-states-politics-and-government"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=289357"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/289357\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/289334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=289357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=289357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=289357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}