{"id":51201,"date":"2025-11-25T02:04:14","date_gmt":"2025-11-25T02:04:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/51201\/"},"modified":"2025-11-25T02:04:14","modified_gmt":"2025-11-25T02:04:14","slug":"read-the-ruling-dismissing-the-charges-against-letitia-james","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/51201\/","title":{"rendered":"Read the Ruling Dismissing the Charges Against Letitia James"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>                  <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"g-doc-image lazyload\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/packages\/flash\/multimedia\/ICONS\/transparent.png\" alt=\"Page 12 of 26\" aria-describedby=\"page-12-text\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/output-12.png\" width=\"1700\" height=\"2200\"\/><\/p>\n<p id=\"page-12-text\" class=\"g-doc-text\">Case 2:25-cr-00122-JKW-DEM Document 140 Filed 11\/24\/25&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\n1330&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\nPage 12 of 26 PageID#&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\ntextual analysis&#8221;); United States v. Hansen, 599 U.S. 762, 775 (2023) (&#8220;Statutory history is an important part of&#8230; context.&#8221;); Scalia &amp; Garner, supra, at 440 (defining \u201cstatutory history&#8221; as the &#8220;enacted lineage of a statute, including prior laws, amendments, codifications, and repeals&#8221;). From 1986 to 2006, section 546 was identical to its current form. 12 See Criminal Law and Procedure Technical Amendments Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-646, \u00a7 69, 100 Stat. 3592, 3616\u201317 (1986). But in 2006, Congress amended the statute to abolish \u201cthe 120-day limit and the district court&#8217;s backstopping role\u201d altogether. Giraud II, 2025 WL 2416737, at *11; see USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-177, Title V, \u00a7 502, 120 Stat. 192, 246 (2006) [hereinafter Reauthorization Act]. This change, which was \u201cinserted quietly into the conference report on the [Reauthorization] Act, without debate,\u201d made it possible for \u201cUnited States Attorneys appointed on an interim basis to serve indefinitely without Senate confirmation.\u201d H.R. Rep. No. 110-58, at 5 (2007).&#13;<br \/>\n&#8220;The switch to an unlimited appointment was short lived,&#8221; however. Giraud II, 2025 WL 2416737, at *11. Just over a year later, \u201cCongress reverted to the pre-[Reauthorization] Act language,\u201d reinstating the 120-day limit and the district court&#8217;s role in the interim appointment process. Id.; see Preserving United States Attorney Independence Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\n12 Three days after Congress enacted the 1986 law, an Office of Legal Counsel (&#8220;OLC&#8221;) memorandum authored by then-Deputy Assistant Attorney General Samuel Alito concluded the statute does not allow &#8220;the Attorney General [to] make another appointment pursuant to [subsection (a)] after the expiration of the 120-day period.&#8221; Memorandum from Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Deputy Assistant Att&#8217;y Gen., Off. of Legal Couns., to William P. Tyson, Dir., Exec. Off. for U.S. Att&#8217;ys 3 (Nov. 13, 1986), available at https:\/\/perma.cc\/SD5Q-7CPH. \u201cThe statutory plan,\u201d Alito reasoned, \u201cdiscloses a Congressional purpose that after the expiration of the 120-day period further interim appointments are to be made by the court rather than by the Attorney General.\u201d Id. Though not binding, OLC&#8217;s &#8220;contemporaneous[]&#8221; interpretation of section 546 further supports Ms. James&#8217;s position. Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. 369, 386, 388 (2024).&#13;<br \/>\n&#13;<br \/>\n12<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Case 2:25-cr-00122-JKW-DEM Document 140 Filed 11\/24\/25&#13; &#13; 1330&#13; &#13; Page 12 of 26 PageID#&#13; &#13; textual analysis&#8221;); United&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":51202,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1452,11281,1443,1444,11282,9,11,10,49,51,50,1069],"class_list":{"0":"post-51201","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-york","8":"tag-donald-j","9":"tag-halligan","10":"tag-james","11":"tag-letitia","12":"tag-lindsey","13":"tag-new-york","14":"tag-new-york-headlines","15":"tag-new-york-news","16":"tag-new-york-state","17":"tag-new-york-state-headlines","18":"tag-new-york-state-news","19":"tag-trump"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-ny\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}