The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is taking a closer look at what are called “skill games,” those gaming terminals you’ll spot in bars, restaurants, and convenience stores, as lawmakers look for new income sources. Basically, the machines operate largely outside the state’s traditional gambling regulation, and that’s now changing.
Why skill games are suddenly in the spotlight
Across Pennsylvania, a wide mix of skill‑based machines has taken hold, from touchscreenpuzzle games to digital board‑style formats inspired by classics like Plinko and other drop‑style titles. These games present themselves as interactive alternatives to standard slots, encouraging players to rely on timing, recognition, or simple pattern decisions rather than pure luck. That distinction is what’s allowed them to operate outside the state’s traditional gambling framework, a gap that’s helped them spread quickly through bars, restaurants, and gaming organizations.
Their popularity makes sense. Many of these games are built around short, decision-based rounds that offer a more active experience than traditional slots. Among them, mechanics tied to Plinko bonus features stand out for combining familiar arcade-style pacing with simple, skill- driven inputs. Supporters point to these formats as evidence that the games require more engagement and timing than chance-based machines. Critics, however, remain unconvinced, arguing that the core gameplay still mirrors slots closely enough to warrant similar oversight.
With thousands of machines already in circulation and little uniform oversight, lawmakers are now under pressure to decide whether these games truly offer skill-based play or whether they should be brought under the same regulatory umbrella as traditional gaming products.
What the proposed regulation and tax plan looks like
Here are some of the key elements under discussion:
A proposed cap on how many machines can operate in the state. For example, a bill introduced by senators would limit the total to around 50,000 terminals.A per‑machine fee model: one draft of the legislation suggests a fee of $500 per machine per month. That would translate into approximately $300 million annually inrevenue if fully deployed.Requirements for businesses hosting these machines: rules around location type, ownership limits, player verification, and connectivity so the state can monitor activity.Debate over tax rate: some argue the machines should face the same ~54% tax rate as casino slot machines, while others (especially small‑business operators) push for a much lower rate (as low as ~16%).
Who backs it, and who is pushing back?
Supporters say regulation would bring order to a market that has grown without standard oversight, collect revenue that currently slips through the cracks, and protect legitimate businesses that offer the machines. For example, the bill’s sponsors highlight how manufacturers of these machines and local businesses benefit from the current setup.
Opponents are, of course, raising concerns. For example, if taxes or fees are too high, they argue small establishments might pull the machines altogether, which hits local revenue and jobs. Some also question whether the regulatory framework is fully in place before taxing the machines.
What it could mean for stakeholders
If this regulation goes forward:
The state could gain a significant new revenue stream, which may help fund public services or infrastructure.Small businesses hosting these machines would need to evaluate whether the proposed tax/fee and regulatory burden make it viable to retain the machines.Some industry players may see a clearer legislative framework, which offers stability and certainty, but only if rules are balanced.Existing casino operators may view this as leveling the playing field (since unregulated machines have been seen as competition).Budget pressures making this more urgent
With Pennsylvania’s budget under strain, multi‑billion‑dollar deficits, and competing infrastructure or transit funding needs, the timing is becoming pressing. At the same time, regulated gaming segments such as online casinos and sports betting are already contributing large tax revenues, so the “skill‑game” sector stands out as comparatively untaxed. This context makes the move appealing to legislators trying to close the gap without major new tax hikes on individuals.
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Get Our Free Newsletters
Never miss a headline with NorthcentralPa.com newsletters.
Sign Up Today!
Morning Headlines: Would you like to receive our daily morning newsletter?
Afternoon Update: What’s happening today? Here’s your update!
Daily Obits: Get a daily list straight to your email inbox.
Keep your news local
Access to independent, local news is important, do you agree?
We work hard to deliver timely, relevant news, for free. 100% of your contribution to NorthcentralPa.com goes directly to helping us cover news and events in the region.
Thank you for saying that local news matters!