Pennsylvania is a top turkey hunting state, but we’re not alone.

And one of the other hotspot states is changing things up in ways that might benefit the turkey population, and hunters, in Pennsylvania.

Missouri has long been a turkey hunting magnet, but recent concerns about hunting pressure and crowding – particularly on public land – has led the state Department of Conservation to make a significant change targeting nonresident hunters.

Specifically, Missouri has reduced the spring gobbler bag limit for nonresident hunters from two to one for the 2026 season.

The reason? Well, it’s just getting too crowded out there in the springtime woods.

According to Missouri officials, reducing the nonresident spring gobbler limit should reduce the number of days that those from other states spend hunting in the field. With a “one and done” mandate for nonresidents, Missouri hopes to alleviate the crowded conditions and heavy hunting pressure that has become an issue in the spring season.

I think it’s a good approach.

MORE TURKEY COVERAGE FROM OUTDOOR NEWS:

Spring turkey permit processes indicate no evidence of changes for Illinois’ 2026 season

A quick chat with wild turkey expert Dr. Michael Chamberlain

Committee suggests hike in spring turkey ‘tag’ numbers in Wisconsin

If drastic measures are needed to reduce crowding and hunting pressure, it makes sense to prioritize resident hunters first.

As expected, the change has been largely supported by Missouri’s resident hunters, but some of them want the state to go even further. Among the additional steps mentioned is doing away with the two-gobbler limit, something that has been suggested in various forms in Pennsylvania as well.

But here in Pennsylvania we’ve been told that gobblers are “expendable,” and the second tag won’t hurt the population.

But South Carolina has something to say about that.

Starting with its 2025 spring season, South Carolina reduced the bag limit from three to two gobblers – a move that was supported by that state’s chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation.

In another move made by South Carolina effective 2025, hunters can no longer shoot jakes, which are defined as having a beard less than 6 inches in length.

The changes were made in response to declining turkey populations, which, when you bring Pennsylvania into the mix makes it confusing.

As mentioned, Pennsylvania’s turkey management approach considers gobblers to be expendable and the harvest inconsequential to the overall population.

But South Carolina took steps to limit its gobbler harvest because turkey populations were declining.

So does the spring gobbler season have an impact on overall turkey numbers in a state? Apparently South Carolina thinks it does, but Pennsylvania doesn’t.

In my opinion, any time you kill a bird – male or female – it has an effect on the population to varying degrees. I like the fact that South Carolina recognizes this and reduced its gobbler limit. As for the prohibition on harvesting jakes, I think that’s an interesting step that should be debated here in Pennsylvania.

I am fine with allowing the harvest of jakes for youth hunters – similar with how the antlered deer harvest is regulated (juniors and mentored hunters are exempt from antler restrictions). And I would be OK with a ban on harvesting jakes. After all, no one is out there in the spring gobbler season for the sole purpose of putting meat on the table.

The spring season is essentially a trophy hunt where weight, beard and spur length are what matters.

If hunters aren’t allowed to harvest jakes, they’ll live, and so will the turkeys. That’s a good thing if the population is weak.

Another interesting gobbler season approach enacted in both Missouri and South Carolina is even though each has two-bird limits for the spring, only one can be taken during the first week of the season.

When it comes to pressure, I think this is a great idea that needs to be considered in Pennsylvania. Allowing two gobblers to be harvested at any time of the season makes it a free-for-all. Blast one bird and get right back out there and do it again.

That’s not an ethical way to hunt, and such an approach just increases the hunting pressure which is a major factor why gobblers go quiet.

Again, if gobblers are expendable, does it really make a difference if the opportunity to harvest them is limited just a bit? What is it going to hurt?

There’s no doubt that Pennsylvania is at the top of the list among states for turkey hunting. If we want to keep it that way, perhaps it’s time to consider what other states are doing with their spring season and if it can be beneficial here.