{"id":181610,"date":"2026-05-01T21:30:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T21:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/181610\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T21:30:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T21:30:12","slug":"u-s-supreme-court-restricts-voting-right-act-but-effect-on-pennsylvania-likely-limited-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/181610\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Supreme Court restricts Voting Right Act, but effect on Pennsylvania likely limited | State"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/votebe.at\/pennsylvanianewsletter\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sign up for Votebeat Pennsylvania\u2019s free newsletter here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Supreme Court\u2019s decision in a Louisiana voting rights case will\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.votebeat.org\/national\/2026\/04\/29\/louisiana-v-callais-redistricting-voting-rights-act-racial-partisan-gerrymandering\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">make it harder to challenge political maps<\/a>\u00a0as being racially discriminatory, but the ruling will likely have limited effect on statewide district maps in Pennsylvania, where the state constitution provides stronger protections against gerrymandering.<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/25pdf\/24-109_21o3.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a 6-3 decision<\/a>\u00a0split along ideological lines that raises the bar for proving illegal racial gerrymandering.<\/p>\n<p>The case revolved around\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/crt\/section-2-voting-rights-act\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Section 2<\/a>\u00a0of the Voting Rights Act, a Civil Rights era protection that prohibits racial discrimination in voting and has historically been used to challenge how voting districts are drawn and require that members of a racial minority have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. In the most recent round of redistricting, Louisiana\u2019s legislature drew a map that would create a second congressional district that was majority-Black, instead of the single majority-Black district it had previously. The new map was challenged on the grounds that it explicitly used race as the basis in determining the districts.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAllowing race to play any part in government decisionmaking represents a departure from the constitutional rule that applies in almost every other context,\u201d conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority. He argued that compliance with Section 2 \u201ccould not justify the state\u2019s use of race-based redistricting here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Election law experts in Pennsylvania have\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/news\/2025\/12\/pennsylvania-redistricting-voting-rights-act-capitol\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">said in the past<\/a>\u00a0that Section 2 hasn\u2019t had much of an impact in the state.<\/p>\n<p>Chris Fowler, a geography professor at Penn State University, said that\u2019s because there hasn\u2019t been a clear advantage for mapmakers of either party in drawing majority-minority districts.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the people of color in Pennsylvania are concentrated in its major cities. Minority voters in Philadelphia, a heavily Black city, are generally already concentrated in districts where their numbers allow them to elect preferred candidates. Meanwhile, Pittsburgh has a smaller minority population, and Black communities in the city tend to be geographically intermixed with communities of other races. More racially mixed communities and less consistent racial bloc voting make claims under Section 2 harder to bring in Pennsylvania than in the South.<\/p>\n<p>So while the Voting Rights Act remains relevant in the state and communities of color exist, Fowler said there are \u201cvery idiosyncratic reasons that it would be hard to win a case\u201d on those grounds in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n<p>\u201dIt&#8217;s not necessary to draw a racially gerrymandered district to gain advantage,\u201d he said. \u201cI think both parties sort of know it and they come up with maps that are pretty bland when it comes to racial gerrymandering.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ben Geffen, a lawyer at the Philadelphia-based nonprofit Public Interest Law Center, agreed that Section 2\u2019s relevance in Pennsylvania has been limited, aside from the general background rule it created \u2014 that you cannot discriminate racially when drawing districts \u2014 and the implications it has had for the growing Latino population in the northeast part of the state.<\/p>\n<p>Section 2 has been invoked at the local level. Toward the end of President Joe Biden\u2019s administration, his Department of Justice\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/archives\/opa\/pr\/justice-department-files-voting-rights-suit-against-city-hazleton-pennsylvania\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">brought a case against Hazleton<\/a>, alleging that its at-large method of electing city council members was diluting the power of Hispanic voters. Donald Trump\u2019s Justice Department\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/news\/2025\/04\/pennsylvania-hazleton-trump-doj-hispanic-voters\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">dropped that case<\/a>. The Hazleton Area School District is currently facing a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/storage.courtlistener.com\/recap\/gov.uscourts.pamd.141030\/gov.uscourts.pamd.141030.1.0.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">similar accusation<\/a>\u00a0that its at-large elections lock Hispanic voters out \u201cfrom electing candidates of their choice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Geffen has concerns about the Callais decision that extend beyond Pennsylvania. Namely, that more states may turn to drawing partisan gerrymanders, which the Supreme Court ruled in 2019 in Rucho v. Common Cause that federal courts cannot review. He worries the overlap of racial and partisan voting trends could produce similar maps that are harder to challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Pennsylvania, however, has dealt with partisan gerrymandered maps several times in recent years, and the state\u2019s Supreme Court has struck them down. Geffen said that\u2019s because rules about fairness are much stronger in state law than they are federally.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOur [state] Supreme Court has said the [state] constitution prohibits partisan gerrymandering, so state lawmakers can\u2019t brazenly draw maps for partisan gains,\u201d he said. \u201cI think that has put important boundaries on what map makers do here that helps avoid the excesses we see in other parts of the country.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Marian Schneider, an adjunct professor of law at Villanova University, said that in her two decades practicing election law in Pennsylvania she has only pursued one case related to Section 2. She agreed state law protections are stronger, and said there may be a path to bring the types of arguments in state court that a plaintiff might have previously made in federal court under Section 2.<\/p>\n<p>But Schneider said that regardless of Section 2\u2019s historically limited role in Pennsylvania, Wednesday\u2019s ruling will have an effect on the state\u2019s voters.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKnowing that other states could engage in suppression of minority voters, we are all affected by that, because if they are not truly electing people that reflect the voters, what happens in Congress affects all of us,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>Carter Walker is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with Spotlight PA. Contact Carter at\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tiogapublishing.com\/news\/state\/u-s-supreme-court-restricts-voting-right-act-but-effect-on-pennsylvania-likely-limited\/mailto:cwalker@votebeat.org\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">cwalker@votebeat.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S.\u00a0Sign up for&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":181611,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[81074,4158,902,2027,7720,744,740,742,11936,28,30,29,386,50,382,66,4463,81075],"class_list":["post-181610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-pennsylvania","tag-2020-united-states-redistricting-cycle","tag-democracy","tag-elections","tag-federal-government-of-the-united-states","tag-gerrymandering","tag-government","tag-justice","tag-law","tag-law-of-the-united-states","tag-pennsylvania","tag-pennsylvania-headlines","tag-pennsylvania-news","tag-political-events","tag-politics","tag-politics-of-the-united-states","tag-united-states","tag-united-states-law","tag-voting-rights-act-of-1965"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181610\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/181611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}