{"id":184636,"date":"2026-05-05T20:04:07","date_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:04:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/184636\/"},"modified":"2026-05-05T20:04:07","modified_gmt":"2026-05-05T20:04:07","slug":"countys-2024-audit-proves-33-tax-hike-was-necessary-gaughan-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/184636\/","title":{"rendered":"County&#8217;s 2024 audit proves 33% tax hike was necessary, Gaughan says"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Lackawanna County\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/cms8.revize.com\/revize\/lackawanna\/Document_center\/Revenue%20Finance\/Lackawanna%20County%20FS%2012-31-24.pdf?t=202602091229580&amp;t=202602091229580\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2024 audit<\/a> proves a large and controversial 2025 tax hike was necessary to address a pronounced fiscal crisis, Democratic Commissioner Bill Gaughan contends.<\/p>\n<p>He said as much Tuesday during and after a public audit presentation by the firm Zelenkofske Axelrod LLC. The audit provides a point-in-time view of the county\u2019s fiscal situation at the end of 2024, which county Chief Financial Officer David Bulzoni called \u201cas ugly a year as you can possibly imagine.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It was a year that ended with Gaughan and then-Commissioner Matt McGloin, the county\u2019s Democratic majority commissioners until McGloin resigned early last year, begrudgingly approving a roughly 33% 2025 property tax hike over the objections of Republican Minority Commissioner Chris Chermak. The hike that provided invaluable revenue for the cash-strapped county followed a roughly $11.5 million 2024 borrowing to cover operational costs and a \u201cscoop and toss\u201d debt restructuring that reduced the county\u2019s 2024 debt service obligations to help close a major budget hole.<\/p>\n<p>The scoop and toss, which Chermak also opposed, backloaded debt service payments, leaving the county responsible for higher payments in future years through 2035. Officials at the time described that move and the borrowing as necessary steps to get through the budget year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe budget would not have performed at all without those transactions,\u201d Bulzoni said during Tuesday\u2019s audit presentation, which is available online via ECTV\u2019s YouTube channel.<\/p>\n<p>The county entered 2024, the first year of the Gaughan\/McGloin majority, having carried over about $18.5 million in unpaid bills from 2023 with just about $6 million in its general fund. Officials risked running out of money as a structural budget deficit driven by escalating expenses and relatively stagnant revenues ballooned.<\/p>\n<p>The audit shows total general fund expenses increased by almost $27.3 million, or 22.3%, from 2023 to 2024, with a higher pension contribution and health care and other cost increases contributing to that overall growth.<\/p>\n<p>Public safety and corrections expenses, for example, increased by 12.4%, \u201cprimarily due to increased costs to house prisoners and increased salary and benefit costs for prison employees,\u201d per the audit. It also notes that health and human services costs increased by 31.7% due to an \u201cincrease in budgeted costs associated with the Office of Youth and Family Services.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And while the audit shows total revenue in the county\u2019s general fund increased by almost $26.5 million, or about 20.9%, from 2023 to 2024, that increase includes nonrecurring revenue from the $11.5 million borrowing and the use of federal American Rescue Plan Act funds as a one-time revenue source to help get through the budget year. The revenue situation would have been more dire had the prior board of commissioners not approved in late 2023 a 5.9% property tax hike for 2024.<\/p>\n<p>After the presentation concluded, Gaughan asked what he acknowledged was a \u201cleading question\u201d about the unpopular action he and McGloin took in late 2024 to mitigate the structural deficit problem.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWould it be accurate to say, based on this audit, that the 2025 \u2026 tax increase of 33%, which was painful, was necessary to avoid continued borrowing for operations and a complete financial collapse?\u201d he asked. \u201cThis audit clearly shows what we have been saying since I came in here in 2024: major league problems, expenditures outpacing revenues. So my question is, would it be accurate to say that absent a 33% tax increase the county would be in major financial trouble at this point?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Tim Mirra, a certified public accountant with Zelenkofske Axelrod, said increasing the tax millage rate to \u201ckind of build that funding base going forward \u2026 was necessary and should put you guys on the right track.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Commissioners avoided another tax hike this year, though individual tax bills increased for some unspecified percentage of property owners as a result of the county\u2019s first comprehensive property reassessment since 1968. Other property owners either saw their bills decrease or stay more or less the same.<\/p>\n<p>Having taken considerable heat for his unpopular but arguably necessary 33% tax hike last year, Gaughan feels vindicated by the audit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe audit shows that 2024 was a nightmare in terms of the finances of the county, and that\u2019s what I inherited: unpaid obligations, pension underfunding, structural deficits that really could no longer be ignored,\u201d he said in a phone interview. \u201cThe decisions that \u2026 I had to make, including the difficult decision to increase taxes, were not made lightly, but the 2024 audit proves that there was no other way to go. (The decisions) were made to stop digging and start rebuilding county government, and that was my whole mantra for the last almost three years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The 2024 and past audits are available online at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lackawannacounty.org\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">lackawannacounty.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Lackawanna County\u2019s 2024 audit proves a large and controversial 2025 tax hike was necessary to address a pronounced&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":121465,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[201,182,139,28,178,180,179],"class_list":["post-184636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-scranton","tag-lackawanna-county","tag-local-news","tag-news","tag-pennsylvania","tag-scranton","tag-scranton-headlines","tag-scranton-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184636\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/121465"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}