{"id":215508,"date":"2026-06-10T12:52:07","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T12:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/215508\/"},"modified":"2026-06-10T12:52:07","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T12:52:07","slug":"our-opinion-borders-shouldnt-limit-airing-of-data-center-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/215508\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Opinion: Borders shouldn&#8217;t limit airing of data center concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Susan Magnotta\u2019s plight is an easy one for all Northeast Pennsylvanians to get behind.<\/p>\n<p>A data center was proposed for construction just a shade more than half a mile from her property. She had concerns over what the construction would do to a stormwater runoff system she insists already negatively affects her home. She also cited the Mount Rushmore of data center concerns \u2014 potential pollution, strains on utilities, threats to nearby wildlife and decreased property values \u2014 as reasons to make sure her concerns were aired at public hearings.<\/p>\n<p>Her daughter, attorney Laura McGarry, made a motion at one of those hearings in January, asking for a dismissal of an application for a zoning change that would have permitted the proposed data center campus. And, the board in charge sided with her.<\/p>\n<p>On paper, it\u2019s a win for concerned citizens and a loss for a controversial industry trying desperately to force a presence throughout the region.\u00a0But really, it\u00a0is a situation that could \u2014 and should \u2014 be looked at from every different angle, through a variety of potential issues and concerns. That is why we believe any court ruling resulting from the legal challenges filed over it in the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas is well worth monitoring for citizens, business owners and community leaders throughout the region.<\/p>\n<p>We find this to be a data center-based issue that ultimately isn\u2019t exclusively about data centers.<\/p>\n<p>Magnotta, after all, is a Scranton resident, and the six data-center campus proposed by Scranton Materials LLC would be located at 819 Newton Road in Ransom Twp. Ransom Twp. borders Scranton and looms over Magnotta\u2019s property, but Scranton Materials LLC filed suit about the supervisors\u2019 decision not to grant the zoning change. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes-tribune.com\/2026\/03\/05\/quarry-files-second-legal-challenge-over-ransom-twp-data-centers\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">It argues<\/a>, in part, that Magnotta had no standing to challenge the proposal, because she is not a Ransom Twp. resident or one living in close enough proximity to the proposed site to deserve a say.<\/p>\n<p>As the headline in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes-tribune.com\/2026\/06\/05\/can-neighbors-challenge-data-center-plans-in-a-town-where-they-dont-live\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a recent story published in The Times-Tribune<\/a> asked, \u201cCan neighbors challenge data center plans in a town where they don\u2019t live?\u201d It really can extend even further: Should they be able to challenge plans of any kind in a town where they don\u2019t live?<\/p>\n<p>Predictably, Scranton Materials LLC argues Magnotta shouldn\u2019t, with its attorney insisting she does not have a \u201csubstantial, direct and immediate interest\u201d in the litigation and that \u201cno adverse effects have been established by the proposed intervener.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Unlike most other businesses though, it is impossible to argue that data centers don\u2019t bring <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thetimes-tribune.com\/2026\/01\/07\/project-gravity-data-center-in-archbald-to-pump-water-from-lake-scranton\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">legitimate concerns for folks in communities stretching many miles beyond their proposed sites<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Data center developers operate completely different types of businesses that demand unique needs \u2014 power, water, noise and traffic considerations \u2014 be supplied at least in part at the expense of surrounding communities.Yet, they want their business to be treated like every other business that may not require that type of sacrifice from those who live outside their host communities.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re not sure it should work quite that way.<\/p>\n<p>It should be noted that the Ransom Twp. Board of Supervisors does not oppose Magnotta\u2019s intervention. If it did, we could have a different type of debate. It could center on governments having the responsibility to make decisions that best suit their residents, and the drawbacks of the \u201cNot In My Backyard\u201d stance too many folks take as a fallback at the mere proposal of many useful development projects towns need.<\/p>\n<p>However, the data center debate continues to be an outlier when it comes to community action.<\/p>\n<p>It breeds immense interest, compels strong feelings and it does so over wide swaths of area in regions like ours, where so many proposals have made their way to councils or supervisors over the last 18 months.<\/p>\n<p>The suggestion that a homeowner in one town doesn\u2019t have a \u201csubstantial, immediate or direct interest\u201d in a six data-center campus proposed for a 251-acre property less than a mile away from her residence is asinine. Arguing against that right in court is self-serving, a demonstration of how little data center developers actually want to go through the trouble of convincing residents that their plans are actually beneficial for all communities.<\/p>\n<p>Quelling free speech on the grounds of invisible lines drawn through backyards is wholly un-American. So, on this particular issue, it feels like the right thing to do is encourage discussion by those obviously most affected.<\/p>\n<p>Borders should not restrict those worried about the effects of data centers on their property, their neighborhoods and their lifestyle from expressing those concerns to decision-makers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Susan Magnotta\u2019s plight is an easy one for all Northeast Pennsylvanians to get behind. A data center was&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":215509,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[9079,201,803,1559,28,231,178,180,179],"class_list":["post-215508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-scranton","tag-editorials","tag-lackawanna-county","tag-luzerne-county","tag-opinion","tag-pennsylvania","tag-schuylkill-county","tag-scranton","tag-scranton-headlines","tag-scranton-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=215508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/215508\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/215509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=215508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=215508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=215508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}