{"id":24860,"date":"2025-11-05T00:32:08","date_gmt":"2025-11-05T00:32:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/24860\/"},"modified":"2025-11-05T00:32:08","modified_gmt":"2025-11-05T00:32:08","slug":"how-pennsylvania-voters-reacted-to-spotlight-on-judicial-retention-races","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/24860\/","title":{"rendered":"How Pennsylvania voters reacted to spotlight on judicial retention races"},"content":{"rendered":"

Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up for Votebeat Pennsylvania\u2019s free newsletter here.<\/a><\/p>\n

Pennsylvania voters were out Tuesday to decide whether three state Supreme Court justices deserve another 10-year term<\/a>, a normally sleepy race that drew national political attention this year. <\/p>\n

But despite the amount of money spent on the contests, many voters said they hadn\u2019t seen much of the political messaging about the race.<\/p>\n

Some voters said they wanted to send a message to President Donald Trump by voting to retain the justices for another 10-year term. Others said they felt the justices weren\u2019t following the law. Few voters of any political persuasion seemed familiar with the judges\u2019 specific rulings. <\/p>\n

The three Supreme Court justices up for yes-or-no retention votes were all originally elected as Democrats in 2015: Christine Donohue, Kevin Dougherty, and David Wecht. Two lower appellate court justices are also up for retention.<\/p>\n

The two parties and interest groups have spent millions of dollar<\/a>s on the race, seeing it as critical to the ideological balance in the state Supreme Court, which is dominated by justices elected as Democrats. Leaders such as Trump and former President Barack Obama weighed in, and the attention on the race may have contributed to a bump in mail voting this year<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Republicans have been hoping that a vote against retention would open up a rare opportunity to remake the composition of the court in 2027. They have campaigned in part by criticizing the court\u2019s past rulings<\/a> on 2020 election logistics, ballot curing<\/a>, and redistricting. <\/p>\n

Vote smart(er) with Votebeat Pennsylvania’s newsletter.<\/p>\n

Get the latest news on voting and elections in the Keystone State delivered to your inbox for free every other Thursday.<\/p>\n

Only one judge in modern history has lost a retention election, but this year\u2019s organized effort is unusual, and some voters showed up at the polls Tuesday hoping they could help buck that trend.<\/p>\n

Craig Ferich, a retired Republican voter in West Lampeter Township, Lancaster County, said he believes there\u2019s \u201ctoo much judicial hanky-panky going on with partisan agendas\u201d and voted against retaining the judges. <\/p>\n

Mackenzie Kombo, a Democrat who showed up early to cast his ballot at a firehouse in the Lancaster County community of Willow Street \u2014 a predominantly Republican precinct that Trump won by 30 percentage points in 2024 \u2014 said he voted to retain some judges, but not others.<\/p>\n

\u201cSome of them have been there for a long time, so they need to go,\u201d he said, a sentiment echoed by at least one fellow voter there.<\/p>\n

At a polling place at the city government center in downtown Harrisburg, an area where former Vice President Kamala Harris won by 50 percentage points in 2024, voters were hoping to keep the justices in place.<\/p>\n

Michael Lauer, a Democrat who voted to retain the justices, said he felt he didn\u2019t hear as much messaging coming from the Democrats and the \u201cyes\u201d campaign as he did from the Republicans and the \u201cno\u201d campaign.<\/p>\n

\u201cI feel like a lot of Democrats don\u2019t feel like it\u2019s super important to advertise in an area like this. They feel like it\u2019s mostly secure,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Tami Dykes, a member of the Dauphin County Democrats, was standing outside the government center with information about the justices and other local candidates on the ballot. She said educating voters on the retention race this year has been a challenge, since it\u2019s not a contest that usually receives a lot of attention. <\/p>\n

\u201cMany don\u2019t understand that we never vote our judges back in. We vote to retain or not to retain,\u201d she said. \u201cSo I would say there is a lack of awareness of what retention is.\u201d<\/p>\n

When judges first run office, they list a party affiliation on the ballot, and the Supreme Court justices originally ran as Democrats. But retention elections are considered nonpartisan, and at least one voter told Votebeat they were frustrated in the voting booth because they weren\u2019t immediately sure if the judges were Republicans or Democrats. <\/p>\n

Chris Borick, a professor of political science at Muhlenberg College in Allentown, said removing the partisan designation can trip up voters, and \u201chow we decide it gets jumbled a bit.\u201d <\/p>\n

Polls close at 8 p.m.<\/p>\n

Carter Walker is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with Spotlight PA. Contact Carter at cwalker@votebeat.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Votebeat is a nonprofit news organization reporting on voting access and election administration across the U.S. Sign up…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24861,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[836,37,539,28,30,29,16512,1824],"class_list":{"0":"post-24860","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-pennsylvania","8":"tag-election","9":"tag-harrisburg","10":"tag-pa","11":"tag-pennsylvania","12":"tag-pennsylvania-headlines","13":"tag-pennsylvania-news","14":"tag-votebeat","15":"tag-voting"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24860\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}