![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.hrdive.com\/static\/img\/play.svg?313321260226\")
\n Listen to the article<\/p>\n
\n Listen to the article<\/p>\n
3 min<\/p>\n
This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback<\/a>.<\/p>\n Dive Brief:<\/p>\n The city of Philadelphia allegedly subjected a former diversity, equity and inclusion officer to sex- and race-based discrimination, harassment and retaliation, according to a lawsuit filed Monday (Anderson v. Philadelphia<\/a>, et al.). Dive Insight:<\/p>\n Prior to being hired by the city of Philadelphia as a DEI officer, the plaintiff worked for the city as a chief racial equity strategist in 2022. She allegedly experienced sexual harassment at the hands of her then-supervisor; after reporting him, she was terminated. She was re-hired by the city under a new administration in 2024.\u00a0<\/p>\n The officer alleged her HR manager stripped her of the ability to hire, manage or discipline staff. The chief of staff allegedly complained about the plaintiff\u2019s direct reports and the mayor allegedly told the DEI officer that she didn\u2019t care about the plaintiff\u2019s \u201cDEI ideology.\u201d The deputy mayor allegedly forbade the plaintiff and her team from speaking publicly about equity.<\/p>\n At one point, management advised the plaintiff to target the then-executive director of LGBTQ+ affairs, a transgender worker, and to build a case against the worker in an effort to oust them. The plaintiff also called out a \u201cblackface\u201d caricature in the city newsletter to little success regarding corrective conduct; her manager also brushed her off regarding a disclosure of rape.\u00a0<\/p>\n Finally, the plaintiff alleged that she began to experience retaliation \u2014 and was eventually terminated \u2014 after reporting the sexual harassment of a direct report by another colleague. The worker, who allegedly sent a \u201csemi-nude\u201d image of himself via a dating application, is White, while the plaintiff and the direct report, who was also allegedly fired, are both Black, per court documents.<\/p>\n The worker alleges the city violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the First Amendment.<\/p>\n Notably, late last year, an HR manager\u2019s termination<\/a> was ruled not to be wrongful and biased due to the gap in time between alleged incidents and firing as well as a lack of evidence. Additionally, earlier this month, an HR professional\u2019s bias lawsuit has been kept afloat due to ignored investigations<\/a>, among other evidence.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\nThe officer alleged a series of discriminatory actions, culminating in her firing for reporting a direct report\u2019s harassment. She also alleged the individually named defendants \u201cmade and published false and defamatory statements\u201d about her, \u201cbranding\u201d her as having engaged in workplace misconduct and wrongdoing.
\nThe case is among the latest in allegations made by current and former DEI professionals \u2014 or workers in protest of DEI policies \u2014 as the department has spurred an abundance of legal action.<\/p>\n