{"id":323411,"date":"2026-11-08T01:32:18","date_gmt":"2026-11-08T01:32:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/323411\/"},"modified":"2026-11-08T01:32:18","modified_gmt":"2026-11-08T01:32:18","slug":"pennsylvania-may-require-lawyers-other-court-filers-to-verify-ai-generated-citations-pennsylvania-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/323411\/","title":{"rendered":"Pennsylvania may require lawyers, other court filers to verify AI-generated citations | Pennsylvania News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This story first appeared in The Investigator, a weekly newsletter by Spotlight PA featuring the best investigative and accountability journalism from across Pennsylvania. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/newsletters\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sign up for free here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>HARRISBURG \u2014 \u201cAlways double-check your work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Most people have heard this simple but sage advice at some point in their lives, whether from a grade school teacher, a college professor, or a supervisor at work.<\/p>\n<p>Now, as the use of artificial intelligence skyrockets, a committee that advises the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is weighing whether lawyers and other filers who use that tech should have to certify they double-checked the authenticity of citations and information in legal documents.<\/p>\n<p>Failure to comply could result in sanctions ranging from a reprimand to fines to outright dismissal of a case, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pacodeandbulletin.gov\/Display\/pabull?file=\/secure\/pabulletin\/data\/vol56\/56-43\/1549.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">proposed notice published last month in the Pennsylvania Bulletin<\/a>, the state\u2019s weekly gazette for government proposals for new rules, regulations, and other information.<\/p>\n<p>The Advisory Committee on Artificial Intelligence said it wants to make all court filers aware that generative AI can produce \u201cinaccurate, misleading, or fabricated information,\u201d such as erroneous legal citations or quotations.<\/p>\n<p>Those filers, including lawyers and people representing themselves, must \u201cthoroughly review\u201d the accuracy of any AI-generated content in court documents before submitting them, and certify compliance with the requirement. That includes checking summaries of legal principles as well as all legal citations and quotes.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal would effectively place the accuracy burden on humans, rather than technology.<\/p>\n<p>The public and other interested parties have until Nov. 24 to comment or weigh in with any concerns or suggested changes.<\/p>\n<p>After that, the court\u2019s AI advisory committee can either tweak or formally submit its proposal as is to the high court\u2019s seven justices, who will then vote on whether to adopt it.<\/p>\n<p>The Pennsylvania Bar Association, which advocates for lawyers and the legal profession, has not yet taken a position on the proposal, according to a spokesperson. But in 2024, the statewide association and the Philadelphia Bar Association issued <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawnext.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Joint-Formal-Opinion-2024-200.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a joint formal opinion<\/a> with guidance and best practices for using AI. Among them: Lawyers should verify the accuracy of all AI-generated content.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not the first time the high court has waded into the debate over the appropriate use of AI. In 2024, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pacourts.us\/artificial-intelligence-advisory-committee\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">justices established an advisory committee<\/a> to monitor the use of AI in the legal profession and propose guidance for its specific use within Pennsylvania\u2019s courts.<\/p>\n<p>The following year, the committee recommended an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pacourts.us\/assets\/opinions\/Supreme\/out\/Attachment%20-%20106502825326188944.pdf?cb=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">interim policy<\/a> for the responsible use of AI by judges and court staff, which was adopted by the justices. It allows for using AI in legal research, initial drafting of court documents, and editing and assessing \u201cthe readability\u201d of public documents.<\/p>\n<p>That policy, which is still in effect, does not apply to lawyers or others outside government. The committee proposal that\u2019s now up for public comment would apply to all court filers.<\/p>\n<p>Pennsylvania is not alone in crafting AI-related policies. Courts across the country have tackled the question as stories have surfaced of lawyers submitting court briefs with false or fake information, often referred to as &#8220;hallucinations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Over the summer, a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2026\/06\/09\/us\/ai-lawyers-sanctioned-mississippi.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">federal judge in Mississippi punished lawyers<\/a> on both sides of a civil case who filed legal documents with fake citations after using AI. Two of those lawyers were barred from appearing in that district\u2019s federal court for two years.<\/p>\n<p>Spotlight PA reported that filings in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/news\/2026\/01\/pennsylvania-commonwealth-court-ai-hallucinations-allegations-justice-system\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">at least 13 Pennsylvania court cases in 2025<\/a> contained confirmed or implied AI hallucinations, including a high-profile case before an appellate court involving gender discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>BEFORE YOU GO\u2026 If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/donate\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">spotlightpa.org\/donate<\/a>. Spotlight PA is funded by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spotlightpa.org\/support\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">foundations and readers like you<\/a> who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.<\/p>\n<p>\nCopyright 2026 Maranatha Broadcasting Co., Inc.. All Rights Reserved.\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This story first appeared in The Investigator, a weekly newsletter by Spotlight PA featuring the best investigative and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":323412,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1609,28,30,29,4049],"class_list":["post-323411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-pennsylvania","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-pennsylvania","tag-pennsylvania-headlines","tag-pennsylvania-news","tag-spotlight"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=323411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/323411\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=323411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=323411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=323411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}