{"id":83004,"date":"2026-01-10T03:44:08","date_gmt":"2026-01-10T03:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/83004\/"},"modified":"2026-01-10T03:44:08","modified_gmt":"2026-01-10T03:44:08","slug":"cheltenhams-new-logo-sparks-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/83004\/","title":{"rendered":"Cheltenham&#8217;s new logo sparks debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Cheltenham Township, an older suburb bordering on Philadelphia, spent $25,000 on new branding.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>While some residents are pleased with the results, others cried foul, taking to Facebook to vent their ire.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLooks like the Cracker Barrel logo\/rebranding debacle,\u201d Lisa Dalton-Hinchcliff posted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI haven\u2019t been this excited since \u2018New Coke\u2019 back in the day,\u201d quipped Mark Rosser.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>At the Board of Commissioners\u2019 October 2025 Public Affairs Committee meeting, one resident noted that the new logo would have been \u201ca great opportunity for resident engagement,\u201d noting that it could be coupled with a new \u201cserious\u201d economic plan for the township.<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner Irv Brockington asked whether they had requested that their residents \u201cget involved with this at all.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Public Affairs Officer Lauren Walter said they didn\u2019t ask the public to weigh in because it would have added to the expense. But they had used information from the township\u2019s 2022 comprehensive resident survey and additional research, she said.<\/p>\n<p>On Facebook, residents asked how the company that designed the logo, <a href=\"https:\/\/leapmatter.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">LEAP Group (matter),<\/a> was chosen. Walter told Broad + Liberty that the township sent out a request for proposals last year after first trying a local firm.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cheltenham budgeted $30,000 for the new brand, so the project came in under budget, Walter noted.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe township is not immediately buying anything that\u2019s not already slated for purchase or replacement with the new brand.\u00a0It will appear on signage and vehicles as they are purchased or replaced. The township letterhead is not a supply of paper, but a digital file that can be changed without any cost this year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe goal of the project was not a \u2018rebrand\u2019, but to establish a unified brand where none existed,\u201d said Walter.\u00a0 Previously, our departments were operating under a number of different logos and images that didn\u2019t relate to each other and didn\u2019t create a unified look to identify Cheltenham.\u00a0 With the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cheltenhampa.gov\/newsview.aspx?nid=6625#gsc.tab=0\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Township\u2019s celebrations for historic America 250 year<\/a>, we felt it was pressing to accomplish this goal for implementation in 2026.\u00a0 The township\u2019s original seal is still part of its identity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/patch.com\/pennsylvania\/lansdale\/lansdale-branding-initiative-now-in-motion\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Lansdale<\/a> adopted a new \u201cL\u201d logo and slogan in 2012, paying a firm $68,000.<\/p>\n<p>Walter and Taylor Bird, with LEAP, presented three choices to the committee.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Walter said the new logo design signifies water from the township\u2019s streams flowing. A \u201cC\u201d has open space in the center in the shape of a spark, meaning progress.\u00a0 The new tagline is \u201cRich history. Vibrant future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner Mitchell Zygmund-Felt had worked in advertising and noted that corporations might pay $75,000 or more to create a new logo.<\/p>\n<p>He called the new branding \u201creally well-done.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Residents responded on a Facebook page run by a town resident.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat a waste,\u201d said Terry LaBan. \u201cIt\u2019s totally generic \u2014 could be the logo for anything, or nothing at all. If anything, it looks like a robot claw.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Kevin Serowsky said, \u201cI feel truly inspired by the new design. Thank you, Cheltenham, for using my tax dollars for something meaningful.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sarah Ferone said, \u201cI bet this logo will grow on residents over time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, she believes the \u201cbrand reveal\u201d could have been presented to the public in a better fashion.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cKudos to (Commissioner) Irv Brockingham for questioning the lack of public involvement,\u201d she said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Emily Steinberg called the new logo \u201cWorse than pathetic\u201d and an \u201cawful waste of money, beyond mediocre design.\u201d She is \u201cto be very disappointed by the lack of creativity and creative thinking with our elected officials.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Andrews Benson called the rebrand \u201cpointless.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Alex Bedenko said, \u201cSo, $26,000 spent while we cut services and raise taxes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And Rhonda Genzink Isser does not have a problem with the new logo, but argued that the township didn\u2019t do a survey specifically for it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI question the expenditure at a time when the township faces financial difficulties\u2026Right now, we need to be funding needs, not wants,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWasting township resources on a rebrand. What for?\u201d asked Jay Greenwald. \u201cWill it bring down our taxes. Will it generate new revenue? Will it provide new services? Any time that employees spent thinking about, working on, or executing this was a waste.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Linda Stein is a Philadelphia-area journalist.<\/p>\n<p>EDITOR\u2019S NOTE: This story was updated to clarify that some comments were posted on a Facebook page run by a Cheltenham Township resident, not the town\u2019s own page.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Cheltenham Township, an older suburb bordering on Philadelphia, spent $25,000 on new branding.\u00a0 While some residents are pleased&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":83005,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[40582,200,69,71,70],"class_list":{"0":"post-83004","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-philadelphia","8":"tag-cheltenham","9":"tag-montgomery-county","10":"tag-philadelphia","11":"tag-philadelphia-headlines","12":"tag-philadelphia-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83004","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83004"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83004\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83004"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83004"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-pa\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83004"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}