There are very few truly “untouchable” players in the NBA. In practice, most stars can be discussed if the return is strong enough and the timing aligns. Right now, there appears to be one clear exception. The San Antonio Spurs would not trade Victor Wembanyama for anyone. Around him, however, San Antonio’s roster construction is increasingly shaped by the realities of contention rather than patience alone.
That shift matters. The Spurs sit near the top of the Western Conference, trailing only the Oklahoma City Thunder, with one of the league’s best point differentials. Even with Wembanyama still early in his career, the gap between San Antonio, Oklahoma City, and the rest of the conference is already forming.
Across the West, Utah Jazz forward Lauri Markkanen is producing at an elite level. He is averaging 27.9 points, 7.2 rebounds, and 2.2 assists through 33 games, continuing a stretch of play that places him among the league’s most efficient high-volume scorers.
Yet Utah remains near the bottom of the conference. That contrast — peak individual output paired with limited team progress — is why Markkanen’s name continues to surface in league discussions, even as the Jazz publicly signal that he is central to their plans.
That combination raises a natural question: if San Antonio is truly ready to consolidate around Wembanyama, is Markkanen the type of swing worth exploring?
San Antonio Spurs Land Lauri Markkanen in NBA Trade Proposal
Utah Jazz Receive:
De’Aaron Fox
2027 First-Round Pick (ATL via SAS)
2029 First-Round Pick (SAS)
San Antonio Spurs Receive:
Why the Utah Jazz Do the Deal
Markkanen has been a frequent rumor name for years. When Utah has taken calls, the reported asking price has been steep — in some cases described as every available pick and swap plus multiple young players — underscoring how highly the organization values him.
That leverage is real. Markkanen is on a long-term contract, and Utah has no obligation to move him quickly or cheaply.
Still, leverage does not always equal direction. Even with Markkanen playing the best basketball of his career, the Jazz remain stuck in the conference’s lower tier, with little evidence that the current construction can meaningfully climb.
This deal would not be about Fox as a long-term answer in Salt Lake City. Instead, it would be about flexibility. Fox represents movable salary and immediate value, while the two first-round picks — particularly the 2027 selection via Atlanta — align cleanly with Utah’s asset-driven approach.
The Jazz already control one of the league’s deepest draft portfolios. Adding to it further positions them to either pursue a future star or reshape the roster when the opportunity arises, rather than remaining tethered to a timeline that has stalled.
Why the San Antonio Spurs Do the Deal
San Antonio’s rise has arrived sooner than many anticipated. The Spurs enter this stretch second in the Western Conference with a 27–13 record, already separating themselves from much of the pack behind them despite Victor Wembanyama still being early in his career arc.
Recent Spurs coverage has consistently framed Wembanyama as the lone untouchable, with young guards such as Stephon Castle and Dylan Harper viewed as pieces the organization is extremely reluctant to move. That caution, combined with limited tradable salary, has led some reporting to suggest that a Markkanen-level trade is difficult to execute right now.
That makes a Fox-centered structure notable.
The Spurs have a developing logjam in the backcourt and fewer long-term needs at point guard than in the frontcourt. Markkanen, by contrast, fills a clean role. At seven feet, he provides elite shooting, secondary creation, and the ability to function seamlessly alongside Wembanyama without overlapping responsibilities.
From a basketball standpoint, the fit is straightforward. Markkanen’s spacing would open the floor for Wembanyama, reduce offensive pressure on San Antonio’s young guards, and give the Spurs a legitimate second scoring pillar in high-leverage playoff settings.
The question is not whether the pairing works — it clearly does — but whether the Spurs believe now is the moment to convert future flexibility into present certainty.
Bigger Picture
Markkanen’s situation sits at the intersection of possibility and restraint. League observers and prediction markets have framed a trade as plausible but far from expected, reflecting Utah’s leverage and San Antonio’s caution.
That tension defines this proposal.
Utah would secure additional draft capital and optionality without committing to another reset. San Antonio would consolidate around Wembanyama with a frontcourt partner whose game fits both stylistically and chronologically. And both teams would be operating within a trade market that has grown more hesitant to unload massive, unprotected pick hauls.
Whether this deal happens now, later, or not at all is secondary to the larger takeaway.
The Spurs are no longer building in theory. They are measuring themselves against Oklahoma City — and moves like this are how that gap would be challenged if San Antonio ever decides that waiting carries more risk than acting.