When the Texas State Securities Board dropped the hammer on Brooklynn Chandler Willy almost six years ago, it set her friend Paula Vacek on a path to getting convicted for wire fraud.

Vacek was laundering money to Willy – some from Lubbock-based Ferrum IV.

Brooklynn Willy

Brooklynn Willy

Willy could no longer take that money out in the open – and she was ordered to pay back clients more than $2.7 million in commissions. Why? Because she accepted an agreement with the Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) for the sale of unregistered securities.

Vacek, facing her own trouble, secretly recorded Willy for federal agents before taking a plea deal this year.

Willy and Vacek are both awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty earlier this year to federal charges. Among the charges Willy admitted: Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering.

That brings us to the present. Joshua Allen and Michael Cox of Lubbock are on trial in San Antonio for securities fraud and conspiracy. Vacek testified Thursday.

The two Lubbock men have been accused in civil litigation of using Lubbock-based Ferrum Capital (and related companies) as a Ponzi scheme. Federal officials have also occasionally called it a Ponzi.

Before Vacek took the stand

Before Vacek took the stand, Greta Cantwell, assistant director of the Enforcement Division of the TSSB, outlined the board’s investigation of Willy and Ferrum.

Willy was a registered investment advisor. As an independent contractor, she had to work under a firm. She was terminated and registered her own firm, Cantwell said.

Willy’s filing was flagged, Cantwell said, because she was terminated for selling alternative investments – Ferrum promissory notes.

The TSSB disciplined her, saying they’d register her firm, but:

Could no longer sell Ferrum products.

Had to return $2.75 million in commissions.

She was suspended for a year.

“The investments in Ferrum were not suitable for those investors and they were owed fiduciary [information],” Cantwell said.

The TSSB also started monitoring Willy.

“She was subject to inspection and had to give us information. We received notice and heard she was not fully complying,” Cantwell said.

TSSB requested more financial and bank records from Willy.

The prosecution asked Cantwell if Willy receiving funds from Ferrum would violate her agreement.

The defense objected but was overruled.

Allen’s attorney Eddie Mendoza then asked Cantwell if she was involved in the Ferrum investigation along with Willy.

Yes, she answered, saying they were separate but related investigations.

Mendoza then asked if she saw things in the Willy investigation that did not involve Allen, and she said Ferrum was involved.

Mendoza wanted to push further but his line of questioning was shot down by an objection from prosecutors which was sustained by Judge Fred Biery.

Original charges against Willy

We mentioned earlier in the story that Vacek wore a wire to help federal investigators gain evidence against Willy.

The original charges against Willy were Obstruction and False Statement.

At first, Willy was indicted alone – months before Allen and Cox.

About a month before she was indicted, FBI agents interviewed her. She lied.

According to the indictment she was “falsely stating to federal agents” that one of the documents from her customers was a “true reflection” of what happened. It wasn’t, according to the indictment.

She took a deal for 10 federal charges, which we covered here.

Vacek on the stand

Vacek worked as an accountant and was close friends with Willy.

After Willy got into trouble with the state board, she “asked me to receive funds and then send them to her bank account,” Vacek said.

The money was sent to Cold Moon Holdings.

“What’s it do?” she was asked.

“Nothing. It’s a shell company,” Vacek answered. “[Willy] asked me to receive deposits and wire them to her.”

Vacek was asked why.

“She was under investigation from the [board] and money needed to be filtered through Cold Moon Holdings,” Vacek said.

So $576,000 from Ferrum IV and $500,000 from a client of Willy’s was sent to the Cold Moon Holdings account at First Commercial Bank in New Braunfels, Vacek said.

Vacek attempted to wire it to Willy’s account but the bank president told her they wouldn’t approve the wire because they knew about the Willy investigation, she said.

Vacek told the court she called Willy, who told her she’d get back to her.

Willy called back and said an account would be set up with a Lubbock bank, making it easier for the transfer to work, Vacek said.

Willy talked to someone at Ferrum, but Vacek didn’t know who, she said. An account was set up at First Bank & Trust, then she transferred money to Willy.

Willy asked for a second transfer, telling Vacek she needed it to pay back commissions.

“The money couldn’t show in her account,” Vacek said.

When asked if Vacek thought this was OK, she said no.

So why did she do it?

“I was trying to help her in ways she helped me,” Vacek said, inferring Willy helped her with a serious crisis, but did not offer more.

“I wish I hadn’t,” Vacek added.

Prosecutors showed $350,000 was sent from Ferrum to the Cold Moon Holdings account in Lubbock in early 2022. A day later, that amount was sent to Willy.

Vacek cross examined

Allen’s attorney Anthony Box then cross-examined Vacek. He asked if she expected testifying would give her a lighter sentence.

She said that was her hope but had no expectation.

Box brought up a different situation where she convinced two people to invest $200,000 and she used it for her own benefit.

“Was Ferrum involved?” he asked and Vacek said no.

Read our series on Ferrum

LubbockLights.com covered Ferrum for more than a year-and-a-half.

Click here to see our series of stories.

As more witnesses describe frustrations with Ferrum Capital losses, judge says trial now expected to go to jury next week

August 14, 2026

Willy’s close friend wore wire for feds after helping her launder money; Thursday she testified in Ferrum Capital case

August 13, 2026

Witnesses in Ferrum Capital trial tell frustrating stories of confusion, anger, huge financial losses

August 12, 2026

Prosecution shows torrent of documents they say proves Ferrum scheme; defense floats idea Ferrum also fraud victim

August 11, 2026

Opening arguments in Ferrum Capital trial: Was it a ‘big lie’ and ‘money making machine’ or honest endeavor that failed?

August 10, 2026

As Allen, Cox watch via Zoom, defense, prosecution battle over motions in pre-trial hearing before trial begins Monday

August 7, 2026

More than a year after Joshua Allen, Mike Cox indicted by feds, Ferrum Capital trial begins Monday in San Antonio

August 6, 2026

Willy sentencing delayed – part of Ferrum Capital criminal case

August 3, 2026

Judge denies Allen’s request to toss federal charges against him, claiming indictment doesn’t give him chance at fair trial

July 30, 2026

Battle before the courtroom battle: Allen, Cox and federal prosecutors maneuvering on which evidence jury can weigh

July 21, 2026

Judge denies Allen’s request to push back criminal trial set for August 10

July 2, 2026

No plea deal and none expected in Ferrum case as Allen seeks delay and prosecutors balk

June 19, 2026

Judge approves receiver plan, ordering Joshua Allen to not use other business assets, a step toward possible restitution

June 12, 2026

Receiver in Ferrum Capital case asks judge to keep Josh Allen from selling assets in effort to reclaim money for victims

June 1, 2026

Collection efforts against Joshua Allen in Walk-On’s case successfully completed

May 15, 2026

Key Ferrum Capital player: ‘You’re asking me – where’s the rest of the money? I really want to know that. I don’t know.’

May 13, 2026

Ferrum victims may have one place to file claims if judge approves at May 19 court hearing

April 28, 2026

Ferrum victims may have places to look for recovery assets, says receiver who handled Amarillo Walk-On’s settlement

April 15, 2026

Allen losing ownership interest in Neufeld companies to pay off Walk-On’s investor lawsuit in $835,000 settlement

April 13, 2026

People who made money at start of Ferrum’s ‘Ponzi scheme’ targeted to pay back half or defend themselves in court

March 23, 2026

Ferrum affiliate Willy pleads guilty to ten federal charges in San Antonio – Joshua Allen, Michael Cox still awaiting trial

March 19, 2026

Feds update charges against Willy in Lubbock-based Ferrum Capital case, could take her assets

March 4, 2026

Criminal trial delayed for Ferrum co-founders Joshua Allen and Michael Cox, Willy negotiating plea deal with feds

February 4, 2026

Josh Allen may lose companies as one impact from receivers working on Walk-On’s, Ferrum cases

November 25, 2025

$1.2 million dollar victory for Ferrum victims – only a fraction of what they lost according to FBI statement

November 21, 2025

FBI asks Ferrum victims to come forward, while receiver aggressively seeks immediate payments to victims

November 7, 2025

Where did money in Ferrum Capital go? Answers found in forensic accounting report obtained by Lubbock Lights.com

October 8, 2025

Ferrum criminal trial – Allen, Cox and Willy – pushed back until next year

September 5, 2025

Ferrum detour to Delaware ends; what that means for victims in Lubbock, San Antonio

July 29, 2025

Criminal trial date set for Ferrum’s Allen, Cox; their San Antonio affiliate’s court process pushed back

July 24, 2025

The case against Vacek

Records in the Vacek case said from late 2021 through early 2024 she accepted money from a couple “… by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.”

“Instead of being invested, Vacek used this money for her own purposes,” the criminal charge against her said.

But she also played a role for Willy in Ferrum IV, according to records filed in the Allen/Cox case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph Blackwell wrote up allegations that Allen and Cox used Ferrum IV to move money to Vacek, who in turn moved it over to Willy.

“In 2019, an elderly couple, Randall and Terry McGuire, invested $200,000 in Ferrum Capital. In the spring of 2021, Willy and Cox convinced the McGuires to make two additional investments totaling $700,000 in Ferrum IV,” Blackwell wrote.

“The McGuires’ money itself was moved from Ferrum IV to Vacek to Willy,” Blackwell’s documentation said.

“… It is evidence of a financial transaction ‘designed in whole or in part to conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control’ of investor proceeds,” Blackwell wrote as he was making the case for a money laundering conspiracy.

Vacek’s plea agreement was not publicly available – but according to the San Antonio Express-News, Vacek was ordered to pay more than $780,000 in restitution. Blackwell previously said in open court that Vacek had been cooperating with investigators for about two years and was expected to testify at the Allen/Cox trial, according to the Express-News.

Related

Related posts