SAN ANTONIO — After the Spurs’ decisive victory in their season opener, it was a full-court press from those for and against the proposed projects and how they are funded. But what is fact and fiction is still being debated.

“It was very unclear in the beginning,” said Bexar County voter Randy Jaso.

Bexar County voter Randy Jaso says despite clashing messages around Propositions A and B for the Spurs arena and rodeo grounds, it’s time for people to decide. “It’s a very important vote,” said Jaso.

It’s why organizations like the Community of Churches for Social Action and even Spurs majority owner Peter Holt have stood up to fight misinformation. “Mainly about how it’s gonna be paid for,” said Geoffrey Stirrup, Chairman of the Community of Churches for Social Action.

RELATED: POLL: With early voting beginning today, do you support Prop A and/or Prop B?

And on the same day, multiple community groups including COPS/Metro have also taken a stand, saying this venue tax increase could be used for other things. Spurs officials disagree. “This is a tax that’s paid for by visitors,” said Spurs majority owner Peter Holt.

They say it can only be used for tourism-related projects. Even if it’s related to infrastructure, it can only be used to put “heads in beds.”

But COPS/Metro officials also say if the arena is built, there will be domino costs. “Two hundred million dollars for the infrastructure around the arena and a parking garage, paid for by our property taxes,” said Diane Duesterhoeft, COPS/Metro leader.

But According to Councilwoman Sukh Kaur, we actually don’t know how much this will cost and this infrastructure will have to be paid for even without the arenas construction.

“We’re still gonna receive that same funding at the same level that we’ve always received in our city,” said Stirrup.

Meanwhile, opponents of Prop A and B have filed an ethics complaint with the San Antonio City Attorney’s Office outlining a concern with what they say is coordinated, one-sided communication between city council members and the Win Together campaign. It remains to be seen what will happen with that complaint.