Candidates running for office receive an education in election math. Friends, neighbors and supporters matter, but they won’t be enough to carry you to victory. Winning requires building a coalition of voters who don’t know you and don’t always agree with you, but who are willing to support you for different reasons.
That lesson is worth remembering as analysts continue to dissect the results of this year’s Texas primaries, especially in Dallas County, where women cast 61% of the votes. The story Democrats want to tell is that turnout surged, energy is high and Texas may be shifting. The data tell a different story.
Democratic turnout was higher than usual for a non-presidential cycle, but only modestly so, said Rice University political scientist Mark P. Jones. Democratic turnout exceeded Republican turnout by roughly 100,000 votes and represented about 12% of registered voters, he said.
In Dallas County, the pattern looked more dramatic. Democratic ballots outpaced Republican ballots during early voting, reinforcing the impression of momentum in one of the state’s bluest counties, where additional turnout has the least statewide impact.
The increase was driven in part by a competitive U.S. Senate primary and strong opposition among Democratic voters to President Donald Trump, factors that boost participation within a party’s base without expanding it. Early estimates suggest roughly a third of Democratic primary turnout came from new participants, a sign of volatility that can reshape a primary, but does not necessarily translate into a stable general election coalition.
Opinion
In business, leaders often mistake activity for progress. Politics has a similar blind spot, as turnout is treated as a key performance indicator when it is a misleading one: a measure of intensity within a coalition, not the size or reach of it.
Think of turnout as volume and coalition as range. You can increase volume within your base — higher participation, stronger margins, more visible enthusiasm — but, if your coalition does not expand beyond that base, you still lose.
To see why, compare the primary to the general election. In recent statewide races, winning candidates have needed more than 4 million votes, nearly double the total turnout of either party’s primary this year. Matt Angle, a longtime Democratic strategist, framed it plainly in a recent interview: Democrats must build a broader coalition to win, even as they work to maximize turnout among their base.
The Dallas County results offer a second example of how easy it is to misread political data. In news reports, women were described as the most powerful voting bloc in local Democratic politics, as if that’s novel. But as Jones notes, women have made up roughly three-fifths of the Democratic primary electorate for several election cycles. This year followed the same pattern.
The same mistake shows up in how turnout surges are interpreted statewide. When a Republican occupies the White House, Democratic voters tend to show up in force during primaries. Competitive races amplify that effect. This year’s surge reflects both dynamics.
Elections are often described as a contest between demographic blocs — the women vote, the Latino vote, the suburban vote. Campaigns track these groups because they are easy to measure.
But elections are won by assembling overlapping support across many categories. The risk is treating demographic groups as politically uniform. In reality, voters within the same racial or ethnic category often divide by income, geography, education and issue priorities. When campaigns assume alignment where it does not exist, they misread both the electorate and the math required to win.
Texas makes that distinction unforgiving. Urban counties like Dallas already deliver large Democratic margins. Increasing turnout there adds votes, but statewide races hinge on voters who do not reliably vote Democratic. Success in November depends on whether Democratic candidates can gain the support of Texans who regularly, or at least sometimes, vote Republican. Until Democrats consistently narrow margins in places like Collin, Denton, Williamson and Fort Bend counties, turnout spikes in urban strongholds amount to a sugar high.
None of this means Democrats should dismiss what happened this year, Jones said. The turnout surge suggests the party has rebuilt something it needs: organizational energy.
High turnout increases volume within a coalition. Victory requires expanding its range. One produces headlines. The other produces victories.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here.
If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com