Ferrum Capital victims may want to know about companies Joshua Allen is connected to, said the court-appointed receiver who took control of Allen’s assets in the Amarillo Walk-On’s case.

Once the money is collected in the Walk-On’s case, Lubbock attorney Max Tarbox will step down from his receivership role.

“But there’s a much bigger case in San Antonio … involving millions of dollars,” Tarbox said.

LubbockLights.com asked if Tarbox would be willing to talk to John Patrick Lowe, the court-appointed receiver in charge of Ferrum Capital as the result of a lawsuit in San Antonio.

“I believe the attorneys in San Antonio would probably want to have some kind of arrangement with me to turn over any information and notes that I have to them so they can pursue those assets as well for that particular lawsuit,” Tarbox said.

“I would give that information to the receivers in San Antonio,” Tarbox added.

Allen and Ferrum

One of Allen’s companies until early 2024 had been Ferrum Capital. Ferrum became the focal point for federal criminal charges against Allen and Michael Cox, who started Ferrum in 2017. A federal indictment accused the two of using Ferrum to steal millions of dollars from hundreds of investors – many of them from Lubbock and the surrounding area. Others were from the San Antionio area.

Their former business affiliate Brooklynn Chander Willy pleaded guilty in March to securities fraud and other charges.

Investors began filing lawsuits against Allen, Cox, Willy and Ferrum in late 2023. A San Antonio judge took Ferrum out of Allen and Cox’s control in 2024 – placing it into the hands of a John Patrick Lowe as a court-appointed receiver. Lowe and Tarbox had the same job title and more-or-less the same job. The receivership in both cases was intended to find and recover assets.

People who made money at start of Ferrum’s ‘Ponzi scheme’ targeted to pay back half or defend themselves in court

March 23, 2026

Ferrum affiliate Willy pleads guilty to ten federal charges in San Antonio – Joshua Allen, Michael Cox still awaiting trial

March 19, 2026

Feds update charges against Willy in Lubbock-based Ferrum Capital case, could take her assets

March 4, 2026

Criminal trial delayed for Ferrum co-founders Joshua Allen and Michael Cox, Willy negotiating plea deal with feds

February 4, 2026

Josh Allen may lose companies as one impact from receivers working on Walk-On’s, Ferrum cases

November 25, 2025

$1.2 million dollar victory for Ferrum victims – only a fraction of what they lost according to FBI statement

November 21, 2025

FBI asks Ferrum victims to come forward, while receiver aggressively seeks immediate payments to victims

November 7, 2025

Where did money in Ferrum Capital go? Answers found in forensic accounting report obtained by Lubbock Lights.com

October 8, 2025

Ferrum criminal trial – Allen, Cox and Willy – pushed back until next year

September 5, 2025

Ferrum detour to Delaware ends; what that means for victims in Lubbock, San Antonio

July 29, 2025

Criminal trial date set for Ferrum’s Allen, Cox; their San Antonio affiliate’s court process pushed back

July 24, 2025

Battle to recover millions for victims in Lubbock, San Antonio is also a tug of war between Delaware, Texas

July 16, 2025

‘Finally … in shackles’ – Ferrum victims ‘ecstatic’ about criminal charges against Allen and Cox

July 10, 2025

Update: Cox, Allen, co-owners of Lubbock’s Ferrum Capital, charged in federal court, could face 70 years in prison

July 9, 2025

New details from Collins bankruptcy show they owed Lubbock-based Ferrum Capital ‘undetermined’ amount of money

June 19, 2025

Attorneys trying to recover money in Ferrum cases concerned about legal processes moving to Delaware

June 13, 2025

Two companies tied to Ferrum and securities fraud FBI investigation go bankrupt

June 9, 2025

More people who lost money in Ferrum Capital case ask bankruptcy judge to keep Lubbock businessman Mike Cox accountable

May 20, 2025

As Cox bankruptcy wraps up, focus shifts to use of Fifth Amendment, possibility of criminal charges in Ferrum ‘Ponzi scheme’

May 2, 2025

Cox deal to keep his house approved but some of his bankruptcy protections lost

April 30, 2025

‘I was shocked and ecstatic…’ family reacts after bankruptcy ruling preserves millions in debt related to Lubbock-based Ferrum Capital

April 29, 2025

Judge rejects Lubbock man’s efforts to use bankruptcy to avoid millions of debt in Ferrum Capital case

April 25, 2025

New bankruptcy judge appointed in Lubbock – to oversee cases across much of West Texas

April 15, 2025

‘They robbed people blind,’ says upset Lubbock attorney representing dozens in Ferrum Capital case

March 28, 2025

Cox bankruptcy case in Lubbock may get new judge, as hundreds wait to see about their millions of lost savings

March 28, 2025

Threat illustrates frustration of Ferrum Capital investors, who want to know where money went, if they’ll recover any

March 10, 2025

Deal proposed in Lubbock $82 million Mike Cox bankruptcy case could recover small portion for Ferrum participants

March 4, 2025

More charges filed in San Antonio related to FBI investigation of troubled Lubbock firm; one victim speaks about losing retirement savings

January 27, 2025

Hundreds may have lost millions with troubled local company after criminal case extends to Lubbock from San Antonio

December 23, 2024

In addition to Lowe, there are bankruptcy trustees – in both the Michael Cox case and the Collins Asset Group case. The Cox trustee said he was not familiar enough with Allen to comment. Many of the people to whom Cox owed money were Ferrum investors, according to court records. LubbockLights.com reached out to one of the trustees in the Collins case, but so far he has not responded.

“We had, I’m going to say, over 20 limited liability companies that he [Allen] had formed and I really haven’t gotten into the inner workings of those LLCs,” Tarbox said, adding he didn’t need to because of the power he was given.

Tarbox was appointed as receiver by State District Judge John Grace in August. Allen had been successfully sued by Raiderland Holdings (owned by Chance Britt) and Jeffrey Tait Crow over the failure of the Amarillo location of Walk-On’s.

Grace ruled Allen had breached his duty to other investors. The location remained open but was taken over by the Walk-On’s corporate office.

Allen was ordered to pay $575,000 plus attorney fees. He didn’t, so Grace appointed Tarbox.

Tarbox convinced Grace to approve an $835,000 confidential settlement this month to sell Allen’s interest in a series of companies. The dollar figure covers the judgment, attorney fees and the receiver’s commission.

“The court entered an order that approved a settlement agreement where we would sell certain interests that Josh Allen had in certain LLCs [limited liability companies] to a group of people, which I would call the Neufeld family,” Tarbox said.

Basically, when we had a board meeting – or membership meeting, I guess is the right word – I asserted my rights to Josh Allen’s interest.

max tarbox

Tarbox was able to settle with the other people involved with some of Allen’s companies because once Grace authorized Tarbox to take possession of Allen’s assets, it included Allen’s ownership and voting rights in various companies.

“Basically, when we had a board meeting – or membership meeting, I guess is the right word – I asserted my rights to Josh Allen’s interest. So, I was a part of the group that voted on this settlement along with the other members of the LLCs. I’m basically stepping into his shoes as owner of his particular interest,” Tarbox said.

Tarbox voted in favor of his own settlement proposal during board meetings of these companies.

Tarbox also said there could be an appeal for 30 days after the judge signed the order on April 6.

“Hopefully they will not appeal,” Tarbox said.

Allen’s wife given notice

In our previous coverage, we noticed Allen’s wife, Chanda, was served with notice in the Walk-On’s case just days before the settlement.

Tarbox explained why that happened.

“That was more of a cautionary act on our part – just to make sure that she couldn’t argue later that she didn’t have an opportunity to show up. Her lawyer represents both Josh [Allen] and her,” Tarbox said.

In some cases, there are marital property rights. But if the companies were under the “sole management control” of Allen, then his wife would not have the same legal claims, according to Tarbox.

“We did not want her to have the opportunity to come back and say, ‘I didn’t have notice.’ So, we gave her notice,” Tarbox said.

Related

Related posts