The Texas equine industry is closely watching a proposed rule change that could reshape how complementary therapies are provided to horses across the state.
On July 21, the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (TBVME) voted to move forward with proposed amendments to Rule §573.14, beginning the formal rulemaking process that could place non-veterinary complementary therapies under greater veterinary oversight.
The proposal is not yet final. Before any changes can take effect, the rule must be published in the Texas Register, triggering a 30-day public comment period during which horse owners, veterinarians, therapists, and other stakeholders can submit feedback or request a public hearing.
The proposal has generated discussion throughout the equine community, particularly among independent practitioners who provide services such as equine massage, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF), chiropractic care, bodywork, and other complementary wellness therapies.
Many practitioners say the proposed rules would require every non-Doctor of Veterinary Medicine (DVM) complementary therapy session to be performed under a supervising veterinarian’s specific, case-by-case instructions for each individual horse.
Supporters of complementary therapies argue that services such as massage and PEMF are intended to work alongside veterinary medicine rather than replace it. They say these therapies are commonly incorporated into a horse’s overall wellness program to help maintain comfort, mobility, and performance while continuing to rely on veterinarians for diagnosis and medical treatment.
Equine chiropractor adjusting a horse. © Elite Animal Chiropractic
Some independent practitioners have expressed concern that additional oversight requirements could create barriers for both providers and horse owners, particularly in rural areas where access to veterinary supervision may be more limited.
Others believe the proposal raises broader questions about owner choice and the role of complementary care within the equine industry. They argue that horse owners should continue to be able to select qualified professionals who have invested years in specialized education, certifications, and practical experience.
The proposal has also prompted calls for respectful discussion between veterinarians and complementary therapy providers. Many practitioners emphasize that both professions share the same goal of improving equine health and welfare and believe collaborative relationships between veterinarians and qualified therapists have long benefited horses across Texas.
Those following the proposal encourage horse owners, trainers, breeders, competitors, veterinarians, and equine professionals to review the proposed language once it is officially published and to participate in the public comment process if they wish to share their perspectives.
At this time, the 30-day public comment period has not yet opened. Once the proposal is published in the Texas Register, the official notice will include submission instructions, including the appropriate email address, mailing address, or online portal for comments, as well as the deadline for public participation.
With Texas home to one of the nation’s largest horse industries, the outcome of the rulemaking process could have far-reaching implications for complementary equine care. As the proposal moves through the next stage of review, stakeholders on all sides will have an opportunity to weigh in before the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners considers whether to adopt the rule.