<\/p>\n
A representative looks at a congressional redistricting map during debate of a congressional redistricting plan in the House Chamber at the Capitol in Austin, Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2025.<\/p>\n
Jay Janner\/Austin American-Statesman<\/p>\n
The Cold War doctrine of \u201cmutually assured destruction\u201d \u2014 or MAD \u2014 held that nuclear war would never happen because both sides knew it would mean total annihilation. The more weapons each side stockpiled, the less likely they were to be used.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
That logic, thankfully, has never been put to the test, though the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 came dangerously close.<\/p>\n
Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n
Today, a far less deadly \u2014 but increasingly consequential \u2014 version of that dynamic may be playing out in American politics: the escalating fight that we’ve come to call “mid-decade congressional redistricting.” It doesn’t lend itself to a clever acronym \u2014\u00a0MDCR doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue \u2014 so we’ll just call it “redistricting” for short.<\/p>\n
To catch everyone up, this new game of political one-upmanship started with Texas. But it didn’t start in Texas. By most accounts, it was hatched in the White House last year as a strategy that might help President Donald Trump avoid a Democratic takeover of the U.S. House in the 2026 midterms. Trump had just scored a double-digit victory in Texas in the 2024 presidential election and had even carried the reliably Democratic and heavily Hispanic counties along the Rio Grande.<\/p>\n
READ MORE: The US has a long history of changing voting districts for political reasons<\/a><\/p>\n All that, in his words, “entitled” him to five more Republican congressional seats in the Lone Star State. But to get them, it meant scrapping the congressional districts enacted by the GOP-led Legislature in 2021 that had provided the party a 25-13 advantage. When the redistricting effort got rolling, Democrats cried foul and stalled action in the state House for a couple of weeks with a quorum break.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n But in the end, they were powerless to stop Trump, Gov. Greg Abbott and the Republicans writ large. Or so the thinking went.<\/p>\n Sure, the new map contains five more winnable GOP districts<\/a>. But the national publicity it generated prompted California to redraw its congressional map to give Democrats five more winnable seats. Utah jumped on the bandwagon and came up with one more Democratic district. Then Republican legislatures in states like Louisiana, Missouri and Ohio developed plans to boost their parties’ chances in November.<\/p>\n And last week, Virginia chimed in<\/a>. Like California, the state’s Democratic leaders asked voters to add four seats their party’s column, and voters obliged, albeit narrowly. Florida, run by Republicans, may become the next redistricting battleground. And who knows which state might be next \u2014 or whether the whole process might be repeated in the 2028 cycle as Democrats and Republicans escalate their quests for partisan advantage?<\/p>\n The destruction in this iteration of the Cold War analogy is not just the congressional careers of a handful of politicians. The overhaul of maps in all of these states also continues, and perhaps accelerates, the gerrymandering process, whereby election outcomes are all but predetermined because districts are drawn largely along party lines.<\/p>\n Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n But there is a chance that the original proponents of mid-decade redistricting may have outsmarted themselves. Take the Texas example and the five newly Republican-friendly districts.<\/p>\n Creating new Republican districts does not create new Republican voters. It simply shifts some Republican voters from existing GOP districts into areas that had been reliably Democratic. And to keep populations roughly equal, as required by law, some Democrats must be drawn into what had been GOP strongholds.\u00a0<\/p>\n Some of the new districts were based on Trump’s 2024 showing in Texas \u2014 the strongest of his three presidential campaigns. In the first two elections, his margins of victory were much smaller. And since 2024, the president’s approval ratings have declined sharply, both nationally and in Texas. According to a February poll by the Texas Politics Project<\/a>, conducted before the war with Iran and before $4-a-gallon gas, only 45% of Texans said the president was doing a good job.<\/p>\n