{"id":321909,"date":"2026-06-04T02:44:11","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T02:44:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/321909\/"},"modified":"2026-06-04T02:44:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T02:44:11","slug":"lubbock-license-plate-cameras-spark-privacy-debate-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/321909\/","title":{"rendered":"Lubbock license plate cameras spark privacy debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"text | article-text\">LUBBOCK, Texas (KCBD) &#8211; Cameras at intersections across Lubbock are capturing images of license plates and storing them in a police database, a practice law enforcement says helps solve crimes, but critics call invasive surveillance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">For the past year, 27 cameras have monitored Lubbock streets, snapping still pictures of license plates as vehicles pass by. The images are stored in the Flock database, which Lubbock Police Department accesses for investigations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cFlock cameras are not surveillance. They are an investigative tool. We use them, I would say on a daily basis, to help solve cases,\u201d said Lt. Brady Cross.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Cross said the cameras help both identify suspects and clear innocent people from investigations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cThey\u2019re a great, great tool and sometimes to find an offender as much to vindicate someone. To say it wasn\u2019t this person we thought it was \u2014 it goes both ways. But on a daily basis there are folks on patrol and in investigations that use these for leads in investigations,\u201d Cross said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Images not related to active investigations are purged every 30 days, according to police. If an officer finds a lead and identifies a car believed to be involved in a case, that image is saved longer for the retention period of that offense.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cNow if an officer finds a lead and finds a car believed to be involved in a case, we\u2019ll save that and it will hang around longer for the retention period of that offense but by and large a car passing through an intersection if it\u2019s not related to anything we\u2019re looking into is purged every 30 days,\u201d Cross said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The Texas Legislature banned red light cameras in 2019, after concerns they violated due process. Police said Flock cameras differ in how they are used.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cIt\u2019s not for law enforcement in the sense that we\u2019re going to write a ticket or that we\u2019re going to punish a traffic violation for running a red light or speeding. It is to assist in identifying vehicles, suspect vehicles, in cases like robbery, auto theft and even homicides,\u201d Cross said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">State Sen. Charles Perry, who represents Lubbock, said modern technology is integral to public safety.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">He recently spoke with Flock representatives to learn how the company and its cameras work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cMy first impression was \u2018wait a minute, what is this? This is a red light camera, no due process\u2019,\u201d Senator Perry said. \u201cIt\u2019s used as a tool to bring due process to fruition, it\u2019s the front end, it gets you there and then due process starts. And due process determines your guilt or innocence, hopefully correctly.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Defense attorney Michael King disagreed with the characterization of the cameras as an investigative tool.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cThis isn\u2019t police work. This is a 24-hour surveillance system, a dragnet that has been placed over the city of Lubbock. Everybody &#8211; not suspects, not criminals &#8211; every person who comes in or leaves Lubbock County is having their picture taken,\u201d King said. \u201cSo, it\u2019s not about the criminal prosecution, it\u2019s about the invasion, the \u2018Big Brother\u2019 that has come down over the city of Lubbock, which we expect to see a challenge to in court.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">In a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.investigatetv.com\/2026\/05\/18\/flock-safety-cameras-help-solve-crimes-whos-watching-watchers\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.investigatetv.com\/2026\/05\/18\/flock-safety-cameras-help-solve-crimes-whos-watching-watchers\/\">recent interview<\/a> with Gray\u2019s investigative team, national investigative reporter Brendan Keefe asked Josh Thomas, Flock Safety\u2019s chief communications officer, about an instance where a woman in Colorado was wrongly charged based on Flock photos of her truck near a crime scene.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cWithout a Flock camera, that detective would not have been at her door, by his own admission. He pulled out the Flock picture of her car. Do you want to apologize to Chrisanna Elser for what happened to her?\u201d Keefe asked.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cFor the police misusing the tools? I don\u2019t think that I have to apologize for him,\u201d Thomas said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cHe wasn\u2019t charged with a crime. I mean, other than being reprimanded for his attitude,\u201d Keefe said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cSure. But I would tell you that, like, should I apologize for somebody misusing a tool. I don\u2019t think so,\u201d Thomas said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Flock says it is not responsible for \u201cpolicing the police work\u201d or ensuring the data is used as the investigative tool it is claimed to be.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Instead, police departments conduct audits. Lubbock Police say that happens annually.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cLaw enforcement has said they\u2019re auditing themselves but that\u2019s like the fox guarding the henhouse,\u201d King said. \u201cThey have absolute control. There have been some audits that have been done and they found that law enforcement has abused this information they\u2019ve obtained and I think seeing this abuse is what is starting to cause the rise of concern in some of the citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">Perry said the state is keeping watch to ensure Texans\u2019 rights are protected.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cWe\u2019re gonna defend the constitution, right. We take an oath and we have to defend the constitution. In the constitution we\u2019re given those protections and those protections can\u2019t be violated because a company didn\u2019t follow the rules or an enforcement division in Lubbock didn\u2019t follow the rules so if something is not going to work within those we\u2019re not going to change the liberty standard, we\u2019re going to change the operator,\u201d Perry said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">The city of Lubbock is paying $86,000 for a two-year Flock subscription. Flock maintains the city owns the data, so the city is responsible for ensuring the cameras are used appropriately.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text | article-text\">\u201cThe city owns the data. So, city council would have the appropriate responsibility in that case. Our point of view has always been that it is not Flock\u2019s job to police the way police do their work,\u201d Thomas said.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright 2026 KCBD. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"LUBBOCK, Texas (KCBD) &#8211; Cameras at intersections across Lubbock are capturing images of license plates and storing them&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":321795,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[168,170,169],"class_list":["post-321909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-lubbock","tag-lubbock","tag-lubbock-headlines","tag-lubbock-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=321909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/321909\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/321795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=321909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=321909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=321909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}