City officials submitted the CDBG-DR plan to HUD on Sept. 18 after months of resident feedback and City Council debate about funding allocations. HUD had 45 days to review the plan, a city spokesperson told Community Impact on Oct. 3, but as of press time the city is still waiting on final approval.<\/p>\n
Houston began drafting the plan in May, with a final version approved by council in August. The plan allocates $100 million to housing programs and $101 million to power generation resilience, such as additional backup generators, as well as funding for emergency response, homeless services and debris removal, according to city documents<\/a>.<\/p>\n According to an October report<\/a> from the Kinder Institute for Urban Research, 12.5% of residents surveyed one year after Hurricane Beryl were still \u201csomewhat or very disrupted\u201d from the storm. Dan Potter, lead researcher of the survey, said the number seems small but represents thousands of Houston residents.<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s that bill that\u2019s always lingering, there\u2019s that repair that\u2019s not quite done yet,\u201d Potter said. \u201cWhile we\u2019re talking about physical and financial things, there are emotional components to it.\u201d<\/p>\n Almost a third of the now-approved plan is dedicated to housing, including home repair assistance. However, the original draft did not include funding for housing programs, which sparked backlash from some residents and council members, as an April HUD assessment showed housing costs were Houston\u2019s top unmet need.<\/p>\n \u201cMany residents, especially in working-class neighborhoods like mine in District E, are still facing unsafe living conditions, including unresolved housing damages with little to no support,\u201d Letty Ortega, a community organizer in Houston, said at a June 17 City Council meeting.<\/p>\n In response to resident concerns, Mayor John Whitmire\u2019s administration decided to reallocate $50 million toward housing, and council member Tiffany Thomas later submitted an amendment to reallocate an additional $50 million from the power resilience program to housing.<\/p>\n After officials opted for the change, council members Fred Flickinger, Amy Peck and Mary Nan Huffman dissented. In a joint statement to Community Impact on Oct. 16, the trio said they felt the reallocation could \u201cundermine other critical recovery tools.\u201d<\/p>\n Another detail<\/p>\n Potter said his team saw a \u201csurprising\u201d uptick in survey respondents who still felt disrupted by Hurricane Beryl after six months, which he expected to trend down with time.<\/p>\n He said the response was likely due to lower-income residents not typically being able to pay off thousands of dollars of bills within a month.<\/p>\n Potter said the Kinder Institute is getting ready to launch another follow up to the survey to get a better sense of the specific financial and emotional struggles residents are still facing 18 months after Hurricane Beryl.<\/p>\n What they’re saying<\/p>\n Thomas told Community Impact the initial move to not fund housing programs felt like a \u201csharp pivot\u201d from the city\u2019s mission to maintain Houston\u2019s image as an affordable city.<\/p>\n \u201cWe had an opportunity to strike and do something to address existing [housing] inventory because if we don\u2019t repair these homes, it becomes a blight in our neighborhood,\u201d Thomas said.<\/p>\n However, in their statement, Flickinger, Peck and Huffman said $100 million won\u2019t be able to support that many home repairs, making it a large expense for only a small number of residents. The council members also said the multifamily housing program would essentially pay for apartment complexes\u2019 remodels instead of preparing people for future storms.<\/p>\n \u201cWe could stretch these dollars further and help more people,\u201d the joint statement read. \u201cUntil those changes are made, pouring in more money only perpetuates inefficiency.\u201d<\/p>\n The local impact<\/p>\n While waiting on federal aid, some residents turned to local nonprofits for support with repairs. West Street Recovery<\/a>, a Houston-based recovery nonprofit, spent almost $1 million repairing homes last year, WSR co-Director Ben Hirsch said.<\/p>\n Hirsch said it\u2019s important to fund public infrastructure, but CDBG-DR program money should be used for recovery specifically, not mitigation. He said the city should use HUD\u2019s separate grant program <\/a>that funds investments in critical infrastructure to reduce the risk of future loss.<\/p>\n \u201cIf you don\u2019t repair homes, what happens is those people all get pushed into the rental market, and all of our rents go up,\u201d Hirsch said.<\/p>\n![\"chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1762575377_572_thumbnail.jpeg\")
Zooming in <\/p>\n![\"chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1762575378_358_thumbnail.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n
![\"chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1762575379_271_thumbnail.jpeg\")
Looking forward<\/p>\n