{"id":406145,"date":"2026-08-14T04:12:47","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T04:12:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/406145\/"},"modified":"2026-08-14T04:12:47","modified_gmt":"2026-08-14T04:12:47","slug":"why-tons-of-fill-remain-in-south-dallas-despite-orders-to-remove-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/406145\/","title":{"rendered":"Why tons of fill remain in South Dallas despite orders to remove it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img alt=\"Aerial view of four neighboring properties in south Dallas, that are the subject of a multi-year lawsuit filed by the city.\" loading=\"eager\" fetchpriority=\"high\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofct bgsct block bg-black mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Aerial view of four neighboring properties in south Dallas, that are the subject of a multi-year lawsuit filed by the city.<\/p>\n<p>Courtesy of Robert Wink<img alt=\"Realtor Robert Wink (right) opens the front garage door to Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property, Tuesday, July 21, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-black mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Realtor Robert Wink (right) opens the front garage door to Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property, Tuesday, July 21, 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Juan Figueroa\/The Dallas Morning News<img alt=\"A hill made of illegally dumped dirt slopes down towards Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property Tuesday, July 21, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-black mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>A hill made of illegally dumped dirt slopes down towards Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property Tuesday, July 21, 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Juan Figueroa\/The Dallas Morning News<img alt=\"Dried mud left from flooding is photographed on the floor of Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property Tuesday, July 21, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-black mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Dried mud left from flooding is photographed on the floor of Michael Williams\u2019 South Dallas industrial property Tuesday, July 21, 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Juan Figueroa\/The Dallas Morning News<img alt=\"Michael Williams motions to the back of his South Dallas industrial property where a hill made of illegally dumped dirt slopes down towards the building, Tuesday, July 21, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-black mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Michael Williams motions to the back of his South Dallas industrial property where a hill made of illegally dumped dirt slopes down towards the building, Tuesday, July 21, 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Juan Figueroa\/The Dallas Morning News<\/p>\n<p>Michael Williams paused outside the building he bought more than a decade ago, unsure whether he could even get inside.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn-channels-pixel.ex.co\/events\/0012000001fxZm9AAE?integrationType=DEFAULT&amp;template=design%2Farticle%2Fplatypus_two_column.tpl\" alt=\"\" class=\"x1px y1px vh abs\" aria-hidden=\"true\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Overgrown grass swallowed the property. Inside, dried mud coated the floor where <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/news\/weather\/article\/rain-flooding-tracker-dallas-fort-worth-22265037.php\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">floodwater<\/a> had repeatedly seeped into the building. Behind it, a 30-foot mound of dirt towered over the back of the property, sloping toward the building.<\/p>\n<p>The mound of dirt \u2014 placed there in an attempt to prevent flooding without Williams\u2019 knowledge \u2014 has rendered the vacant property on\u00a0Botham Jean Boulevard essentially unusable over the past decade.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Williams hoped he could rent the property to generate income. Instead, it has generated something quite different: a maddening and protracted legal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/business\/real-estate\/article\/properties-uptown-old-east-dallas-red-bird-22232286.php\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">battle<\/a> that has involved Williams, his one-time business partner, a\u00a0neighboring property owner, the city of Dallas, a city-appointed receiver, four courtrooms and at least five\u00a0judges.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Nine years later, the pile of dirt that is the point of contention remains.<\/p>\n<p>For Williams, the mound is a reminder of everything he hoped the property would become \u2014 and everything it never did.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When I started this I was 57 years old,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I&#8217;m 71 years old and I&#8217;m still dealing with this issue.&#8221;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The thousands of tons of fill dumped without permits across four properties, totaling over 8.1\u00a0 acres, including Williams\u2019, in a FEMA-designated <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/projects\/trackers\/dallas-flood-map\/\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">floodplain<\/a> in South Dallas. The main legal contention is who should be responsible for removing it and restoring the properties to compliance.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Over the course of the nine-year legal battle, the city has pursued <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/news\/article\/using-dallas-311-22352354.php\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">enforcement<\/a> action against Williams, his\u00a0former business partner\u00a0Keith Poole, and Neil Goldberg, the neighboring property owner.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Poole and Goldberg both told The Dallas Morning News\u00a0that Poole\u00a0brought the fill onto the properties to address frequent flooding. Goldberg said that he\u00a0had no idea that Williams co-owned the property with\u00a0Poole during that time.<\/p>\n<p>Who\u2019s responsible for the cleanup depends largely on whom you ask. City inspectors first documented the illegal dumping violations in 2017. Judges since have repeatedly ordered the fill removed to no avail.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Multiple rounds of mediation involving Williams, Poole, Goldberg and the city failed to produce a resolution. As such, last year a Dallas County judge appointed a receiver to oversee cleanup \u2014 an extraordinary legal remedy used when traditional code enforcement\u00a0fails.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement to\u00a0The News, the city said it has pursued multiple enforcement measures, including seeking the receiver &#8220;to take control of the properties, evaluate the feasibility of all options and undertake the work necessary to address the violations.&#8221;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The city said it continues working with the receiver and property owners to bring the properties into compliance &#8220;as efficiently and expeditiously as possible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>None of the characters in this drama view any of this as efficient or expeditious.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If people really wanted the fill removed,\u00a0it would be gone already,&#8221; Williams said. &#8220;It wouldn&#8217;t take all these years or court orders to have this settled and squared away.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The dirt isn\u2019t the only thing that has piled up. So, too, has the cost.<\/p>\n<p>It is unclear how much it would cost to remove the dirt but Goldberg believes it would exceed the value of the properties, which is estimated at more than $500,000. In addition, the court-appointed receiver has accumulated more than $47,000 in fees \u2013 and growing.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit filed by the city against Williams,\u00a0Poole and Goldberg is scheduled for trial Nov. 10.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Williams says he neither authorized nor knew about the dumping until after it occurred and is unable to sell the property despite his efforts to hold someone responsible and bring the property back into compliance.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s mind-boggling that this is being done and nobody&#8217;s doing anything about it,&#8221; he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Why removing the dirt isn&#8217;t simple<\/p>\n<p>The properties named in the lawsuit were in violation of several code compliance issues. They range from overgrown grass, graffiti, tire storage, trash and the most pressing one:\u00a0unpermitted dirt or fill on a floodplain.<\/p>\n<p>Under city code, permits are required before fill can be placed or removed on a floodplain. which is federal designation . Coordination and approval from the city&#8217;s\u00a0floodplain management department is also required.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Those requirements mean removing the thousands of tons of fill isn&#8217;t as simple as loading it into dump trucks and hauling it away.<\/p>\n<p>Before any dirt can be removed, engineers typically must survey the property, evaluate soil conditions and analyze how removing the fill could affect flooding on surrounding properties, said Edwin\u00a0Ochieng, a certified floodplain manager who has no involvement with the properties in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Flooding doesn&#8217;t stop at your property line,&#8221;\u00a0Ochieng said. &#8220;If you&#8217;re fixing one spot, you might just push the water somewhere else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Large amounts of\u00a0unpermitted fill can change how stormwater moves through a floodplain, increasing the risk of flooding elsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>The technical complexity of removing the fill helps explain why cleanup could take months. It does not, by itself, explain why no engineering plan had been submitted years into the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Court records suggest the delays extended beyond engineering challenges.<\/p>\n<p>In 2022, Goldberg, the owner of three of the\u00a0four\u00a0properties named in the lawsuit, entered into an agreement with the city that gave him time to work with an engineer on a proposal for the site.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Court records later show the city repeatedly informed the court that no engineering plan has been submitted by Goldberg and his engineer, nor have any permits to remove the fill been sought.<\/p>\n<p>Goldberg told The\u00a0News he hired an engineer but he believes the city is unwilling to negotiate with him because of the lawsuits filed by Williams.<\/p>\n<p>A business deal unravels<\/p>\n<p>After being introduced through a mutual friend in 2014, Williams and Poole purchased the property together. According to court filings, the agreement called for Poole to operate an auto repair shop on the property while making monthly payments to Williams.<\/p>\n<p>Williams said those payments never came.<\/p>\n<p>In 2016, he sued Poole, seeking full ownership of the property. It was over the course of that three-year legal battle that Williams said he first learned the city had cited the property for code violations involving large amounts of dirt, debris and other fill material that had been placed not only on his property but also on three neighboring properties owned by Goldberg.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately the court awarded Williams 99% ownership of the property and Poole 1%, a decision Williams believes prevented Poole from avoiding responsibility for the violations remaining on the property.<\/p>\n<p>The city separately filed its lawsuit against Williams, Poole and Goldberg seeking removal of the dirt and remediation of the property.<\/p>\n<p>In 2021, a Dallas County court held\u00a0Poole responsible for removing the dirt. He was held in contempt twice for failing to comply with the court order and ordered to serve 90 days in the Dallas County jail.<\/p>\n<p>Poole told The News that he believes his inability to afford a lawyer impacted the outcome of the lawsuit and resulted in him being jailed.<\/p>\n<p>Whether\u00a0Poole remains responsible for removing the dirt is an open question because of further legal action in the case.<\/p>\n<p>When enforcement escalates<\/p>\n<p>The city&#8217;s lawsuit against all three property owners\u00a0resulted in mediation and the appointment of the receiver.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe defendants have been at an impasse,&#8221; the city&#8217;s filing states. &#8220;The numerous violations of the Dallas City Code remain \u2014 no engineering plans for rehabilitation have \u00a0been submitted and no permits to remove the unpermitted fill material have been applied for or issued.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The court appointed Texas Receivership Group, led by Perry\u00a0Kilgo, and authorized an initial $40,000 receiver&#8217;s certificate to stabilize the properties and begin the process of bringing them into compliance.<\/p>\n<p>Kilgo declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p>Receivership is one of the most aggressive civil enforcement tools available to cities.<\/p>\n<p>Typically, code<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/opinion\/commentary\/article\/trinity-river-illegal-dump-stolen-land-arrest-22372170.php\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"> enforcement<\/a> begins with notices of violation and repair orders. If property owners fail to comply, the city can seek court orders requiring corrective action. A receiver is generally appointed only after those efforts have failed, giving an independent third party authority to manage the property, hire engineers and contractors, and take whatever steps are necessary to restore compliance.<\/p>\n<p>Houston commercial trial attorney Jason Williams, who is not involved in the case, but has handled code enforcement cases, described receivership as a drastic step.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is an extraordinary remedy,&#8221; he said. \u201cIt gives the receiver a lot of power here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He said receivers are tasked with bringing the properties back into compliance and they \u201ctake over\u201d the entire asset. For commercial properties that means receiverships are entitled to the income generated from business operations.<\/p>\n<p>And receivers don&#8217;t work for free.<\/p>\n<p>Every inspection, engineering consultation, court filing and meeting with city officials adds to the receiver&#8217;s bill.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Unlike ordinary invoices, those costs become liens against the property itself. If the fees go unpaid and the property remains out of compliance, a receiver can ultimately ask the court for permission to sell the property to recover those costs, Jason Williams said.<\/p>\n<p>Years of litigation, no resolution<\/p>\n<p>Despite years of litigation, there are still no signed court orders allocating responsibility among the property owners for removing the fill or determining how cleanup costs should be divided.<\/p>\n<p>Michael Williams believes Goldberg should pay the majority \u2013 if not all \u2013 of the fees associated with bringing the properties into code compliance because Goldberg owns\u00a0four of the properties that house the majority of the dirt.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Goldberg\u2019s role in the litigation has also shifted over time.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Court records show the city initially sued Goldberg, in 2020, over the code violations. That led to yet another delay.<\/p>\n<p>During court proceedings, the city requested that the presiding judge\u00a0Staci Williams be recused because she previously sued the city. After an independent review, the city\u2019s request was denied.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This process took almost an entire year, while the underlying case continued.<\/p>\n<p>The city eventually dropped its lawsuit against Goldberg and instead added him to the lawsuit it had filed against Williams and\u00a0Poole.<\/p>\n<p>Williams said he spent years presenting evidence to the courts that he believes demonstrated a business arrangement between Goldberg and\u00a0Poole.<\/p>\n<p>Goldberg disputes Williams&#8217; characterization of the case.<\/p>\n<p>He told\u00a0The News he has continued working with the city in an effort to bring the properties into compliance. Goldberg also said discussions involving the city, the Trinity River Authority and the city&#8217;s floodplain administrator ultimately stopped after they \u201cstonewalled\u201d him but did not dislcose details.<\/p>\n<p>The city did not respond to The News&#8217; follow-up questions about the case.<\/p>\n<p>Goldberg challenged the court\u2019s appointment of a receiver and later sought review in the Fifth Court of Appeals. The appeal was dismissed after court records show filing deadlines were not met.<\/p>\n<p>Nine years later<\/p>\n<p>For Williams, the legal battle has become about more than a vacant building.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGoing in and illegally bringing in dirt to raise the floodplain is definitely against\u00a0FEMA, Texas Center for Environmental Equality and the Trinity River Valley Authority,\u201d he said. \u201c I mean there\u2019s just so many entities that it goes against and it\u2019s being done as though none of these rules and regulations exist.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He says the lack of progress has delayed his plans to move on with his life. Instead, the building has remained largely unusable and the financial costs have piled up.<\/p>\n<p>Williams says he doesn\u2019t plan on giving up.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt has been extremely stressful to be involved in a situation like this where I basically dotted all I\u2019s and crossed all\u00a0T\u2019s,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>His property on\u00a0Botham Jean Boulevard remains both an eyesore and a visible reminder of a legal quagmire that has gone on far longer than he could ever imagine.<\/p>\n<p>He hopes the Nov. 10 trial finally resolves the matter \u2014 and not simply begin another chapter in a dispute entering its second decade.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Aerial view of four neighboring properties in south Dallas, that are the subject of a multi-year lawsuit filed&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":406146,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[102,104,103],"class_list":["post-406145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-dallas","tag-dallas","tag-dallas-headlines","tag-dallas-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=406145"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/406145\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/406146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=406145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=406145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=406145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}