{"id":438763,"date":"2026-09-17T12:28:22","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:28:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/438763\/"},"modified":"2026-09-17T12:28:22","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T12:28:22","slug":"data-shows-texas-remains-center-of-patent-litigation-universe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/438763\/","title":{"rendered":"Data shows Texas remains center of patent litigation universe"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img alt=\"FILE - Apple's App Store icon is displayed on an iPad in Baltimore, March 19, 2018. (AP Photo\/Patrick Semansky, File)\" loading=\"eager\" fetchpriority=\"high\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-gray200 mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>FILE &#8211; Apple&#8217;s App Store icon is displayed on an iPad in Baltimore, March 19, 2018. (AP Photo\/Patrick Semansky, File)<\/p>\n<p>Patrick Semansky\/Associated Press<img alt=\"FILE PHOTO: The logo of Tesla is seen on a store in Paris, France, October 30, 2020. REUTERS\/Charles Platiau\/File Photo\" loading=\"eager\"   style=\"aspect-ratio:3 \/ 2\" class=\"x100 y100 opc bgpc ofcv bgscv block bg-gray200 mnh0px fill\"\/><\/p>\n<p>FILE PHOTO: The logo of Tesla is seen on a store in Paris, France, October 30, 2020. REUTERS\/Charles Platiau\/File Photo<\/p>\n<p>CHARLES PLATIAU\/REUTERS<\/p>\n<p>Texas remains the center of the patent litigation universe, with major companies such as Apple and Tesla fighting cases in U.S. District Courts in the Lone Star State.<\/p>\n<p>Associated Press<\/p>\n<p>Texas\u2019 reputation as the nation\u2019s top venue for\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/business\/technology\/2025\/06\/17\/the-marshall-plan-texas-judge-again-the-king-of-patent-litigation\/\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">patent disputes<\/a> hasn\u2019t faded, according to a new report from Lex Machina that shows a remarkable 40.4%\u00a0 of all patent litigation in the country from 2023 through 2025 was adjudicated in the state.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn-channels-pixel.ex.co\/events\/0012000001fxZm9AAE?integrationType=DEFAULT&amp;template=design%2Farticle%2Fplatypus_two_column.tpl\" alt=\"\" class=\"x1px y1px vh abs\" aria-hidden=\"true\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The data shows three of the state\u2019s four districts are among the busiest in the country. Predictably, the Eastern District of Texas took the top overall spot, followed by the Western District of Texas, while the Northern District of Texas ranked as the ninth busiest district in the country for patent cases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere are just so many relative shortcomings to venues outside of Texas, that it doesn\u2019t surprise me at all,\u201d said Houston civil trial lawyer Demetrios Anaipakos of the results. \u201cI think it\u2019s going to become an even more important venue as, frankly, tech companies flee from jurisdictions like California and are relocating to Texas in record numbers. As they move to Texas, the litigation is going to come to Texas, too.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/business\/technology\/2025\/04\/16\/dallas-technology-company-wins-105m-verdict-against-x-corp\/\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Related: Dallas tech company wins $105 million verdict against X Corp.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Those who pay attention to the patent docket will also not be shocked to see U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap maintained his place as the busiest patent judge in the country. For the time frame examined in the data, Judge Gilstrap handled 19.9% of all patent cases in the country.<\/p>\n<p>Michael C. Smith, a partner in the Marshall office of Scheef &amp; Stone who also runs an Eastern District of Texas blog, noted that because Gilstrap has been handling a high volume of patent cases since assuming the bench in 2011, he provides litigants both expertise and some predictability.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI know with a great deal of certainty what I can do and what I can\u2019t do and I don\u2019t have to spend $20,000 on a motion to find out,\u201d Smith said of operating within Gilstrap\u2019s local rules. \u201cWe have a lot of expertise with what Judge Gilstrap likes and doesn\u2019t like \u2026 and he is tremendously skilled at getting these cases through, and so is his magistrate judge, Judge [Roy] Payne.\u201d \u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>Anaipakos echoed praise of how Gilstrap runs his docket, calling his work ethic \u201cstunning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSome people might say he\u2019s pro patentee. I think that\u2019s nonsense,\u201d he said. \u201cHe\u2019s an even-keeled judge who is pro the prompt administration of justice.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s what he\u2019s interested in. It is jaw dropping for me the way he is able to keep this tsunami of cases moving efficiently.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On a per-judge basis, Texas claims five of the top 10 most active judges for patent litigation, and all four of the top spots, with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/news\/politics\/2018\/04\/25\/trump-judge-nominees-from-texas-grilled-about-political-bias-by-senate-panel\/\" data-link=\"native\" class=\"\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">U.S. District Judge Alan Albright<\/a> handling 4.4% of patent cases, U.S. District Judge Walter Counts III handling 4.3% and U.S. District Judge Robert Schroeder III handling 3.2%. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman rounded out the top 10 with 1.9%.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But those numbers are bound to change in the next edition of the Lex Machina report. Albright, a former patent lawyer who became a judge in 2018 and quickly turned his Waco courtroom into a hotspot for the complex cases, joined A&amp;O Shearman\u2019s Austin office as an IP litigation partner earlier this month.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMy best guess is that filings will trail down, because even if some of the [new] judges show a brilliance in managing patent cases \u2026 those judges still have such a small percentage of that respective docket in their division that it\u2019s an enormous risk to file there,\u201d Smith said. \u201cI think it\u2019s likely that a lot of plaintiffs will be going somewhere else if they can.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After patent filings surged in the single-judge division where Albright sat, the chief judge issued a standing order requiring patent cases be equitably distributed among all judges in the district.<\/p>\n<p>The number of patent cases Judge Albright was assigned took a dip after that, and dipped further after a subsequent order prevented follow-on cases from being assigned to Judge Albright. But Smith said when the jurist decided to move his chambers to Austin last year, he \u201cdisproportionately got a huge number of patent cases pending in Austin.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe order that required districtwide assignment of patent cases in Waco \u2026 didn\u2019t apply to patent cases filed in Austin,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Two new judges have been confirmed to benches in the Western District of Texas, former Tarrant County District Judge Christopher Wolfe sits in Waco, and Andrew Davis, a former partner at Lehotsky Keller Cohn, sits in Austin. Neither judge has \u201csignificant expertise in patent litigation,\u201d Smith said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"uiTextSmall f aic jcc\">Article continues below this ad<\/p>\n<p>For Anaipakos and other intellectual property lawyers, the next 18 months will largely be a wait-and-see period for how patent litigation is handled in the Western District of Texas.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Western District of Texas is increasingly housing very large tech companies \u2014 Tesla, Apple and a lot of significant players who will be involved in patent litigation,\u201d he said. \u201cSo, one would expect the Western District would become a busy venue simply because the other venues remain unattractive.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Texas Lawbook is an online news publication focused on business law in Texas. For more legal news, visit texaslawbook.net.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"FILE &#8211; Apple&#8217;s App Store icon is displayed on an iPad in Baltimore, March 19, 2018. (AP Photo\/Patrick&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":438764,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[27,29,28],"class_list":["post-438763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-texas","tag-texas","tag-texas-headlines","tag-texas-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=438763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/438763\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/438764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=438763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=438763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=438763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}