A month into the school year and six months under TEA control, here are some of the biggest areas of concerns Fort Worth ISD parents and teachers have raised.<\/p>\n
Impacts of staff cuts<\/p>\n
Fort Worth ISD\u2019s Board of Managers voted to enact a sweeping reduction in force<\/a> to hundreds of positions across the district as part of its restructuring plan and to shave off areas of its budget.<\/p>\n Licata told the Star-Telegram at the time that the reasoning for the cuts was because staffing numbers did not match the overall enrollment decline Fort Worth ISD had experienced in recent years. While student enrollment had dropped by more than 12,000 over the last five years, staffing numbers had remained the same.<\/p>\n \u201cWe can\u2019t change what we\u2019ve been doing by moving pieces of the furniture around the room,\u201d Licata said. \u201cWe have to do massive program changes, and that doesn\u2019t mean less services for students. What we\u2019re doing is more targeted, but we have to do a massive program change. We have to give them an ability to get the resources that we\u2019ve been paying for students that we don\u2019t have.\u201d<\/p>\n But Ale Checka, a former Fort Worth ISD teacher who left the district following the state takeover, told the Star-Telegram that programs have gotten worse as a direct result of decisions made by the district\u2019s leadership.<\/p>\n As part of the reduction in force, high school dual-credit coordinator positions were eliminated, with no specific employee assigned the handoff tasks, she said. As of Thursday, the district did not respond to the Star-Telegram\u2019s request for comment on cuts to dual-credit coordinators and how responsibilities have been delegated.<\/p>\n \u201cNobody asked any kind of relevant questions before they cut that position,\u201d Checka said. \u201cAnd then they cut the position anyway. Nobody delegated the tasks that needed to be done between the two institutions. They have come in hot, they\u2019ve broken things, and they did so with no guardrails, no kind of curiosity or planning.\u201d<\/p>\n Other positions that were eliminated or cut include: dual language coordinators; emergent bilingual directors; career and technical education instructors; college, career and military readiness directors; literacy directors; and speech therapists. Since then, the district has voted to hire contracted workers to serve in roles including speech language pathologists, psychologists and occupational therapists, but they are not full-time district employees.<\/p>\n At a Superintendent Strategic Action session at Diamond Hill-Jarvis High School in August, several parents pressed Licata about cuts to dual-credit positions, and said the number of students who are in dual-credit courses has dropped as a result.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat do you mean when you say accountability?\u201d an attendee asked Licata and other district leadership present at the meeting. \u201cIs that when you are micromanaging somebody on how sharp their pencil is, but nobody has oversight over high school dual-credit programs?\u201d<\/p>\n Concerns over AI-infused lessons, classroom slides<\/p>\n Shortly after OpenAI announced Fort Worth ISD was one of 55 school districts in the country that will take part in its ChatGPT for Teachers program, dozens of parents, community members, and students voiced their concerns with AI-infused curriculum<\/a> at a school board meeting earlier this month.<\/p>\n \u201cWe have seen students and teachers demoralized and have seen multiple instances of mistake-riddled curriculum clearly written by AI without any significant response from the district,\u201d said Sabrina Ball, co-leader of Indivisible 12, a grassroots advocacy group. \u201cWhat we have seen in the takeover is not an improvement; it is a massive step backward.\u201d<\/p>\n Students and parents also raised concerns at the board meeting about graphics used in class instruction that were generated with AI. Those included incorrect diagrams on science class slides, AI-generated humans with six fingers, and \u201cunrecognizable animal pictures.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cTo sit in class and be handed materials that are riddled with mistakes, to be told that this is my rigorous education is infuriating and demoralizing,\u201d said Jordan Grimsley, a junior at Arlington Heights High School. \u201cIt is demoralizing to students who strive for excellence and disrespectful to teachers who have spent years perfecting their craft. Our teachers know us and know the content better than any robot.\u201d<\/p>\n A spokesperson for Fort Worth ISD did not respond to the Star-Telegram\u2019s request for comment on AI-infused classroom slides, but previously said district leaders are still figuring out how they will utilize being involved in OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT for Teachers program<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cFWISD is in the early stages of exploring opportunities to leverage OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT technology to support innovation, efficiency, and productivity across the district,\u201d the spokesperson wrote.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are taking a thoughtful and deliberate approach as we assess the role of AI in supporting our mission. At this phase, our focus is on evaluating potential use cases and establishing the appropriate governance, security, privacy, and instructional guardrails needed to ensure any implementation aligns with district policies and priorities.\u201d<\/p>\n In a news release last week, Licata said that district leaders used feedback from parents at community listening sessions to establish \u201cquality-control measures\u201d for curriculum presentation slides. Those measures will ensure materials provided to teachers are accurate, aligned and ready for classroom use, he said.<\/p>\n \u201cWe came to these sessions to listen \u2014 not to defend,\u201d Licata wrote. \u201cNot to explain away concerns and certainly not to tell people what they should be experiencing. \u201cWe heard people. We heard frustration. We heard good ideas… Most importantly, we heard specific things that we can change, and we have the responsibility to act on what we heard.\u201d<\/p>\n Licata also said that teachers who volunteer for classroom recordings will have a lesson videotaped to showcase \u201chigh quality instruction\u201d in order to share with the community what a typical instructional block looks like. Those videos will eventually become public, he said.<\/p>\n Parents question district\u2019s \u2018one-size-fits-all\u2019 curriculum style<\/p>\n As part of Fort Worth ISD\u2019s effort to overhaul the way instruction is delivered, state-appointed leaders have developed a stricter scripted curriculum model for its campuses. Higher-rated schools have gained more autonomy<\/a>, while campuses that have underperformed are required to strictly follow the model, with little tolerance for going off script.<\/p>\n While acknowledging lower performing schools may benefit from scripted curriculum, campuses that have performed well should not be subject to the same standards, said Angie Still, a mother of two Fort Worth ISD students.<\/p>\n Still, who has a third-grader at Rolling Hills Elementary and a ninth-grader at Benbrook Middle-High School, both highly-rated campuses in TEA\u2019s Accountability rating system, said her children\u2019s education experience has worsened this school year. Still is just one of several parents interviewed by the Star-Telegram who shared concerns about scripted learning.<\/p>\n \u201cThe one-size-fits-all mentality just does not work,\u201d Still said. \u201cPeople are not airplanes; they\u2019re not cars. They\u2019re human beings. And they aren\u2019t even adult human beings \u2014 they\u2019re children. Having scripted learning takes the flexibility and creativity out of it and you\u2019re making them lose education. How I learn may be different than how you learn.\u201d<\/p>\n In Fort Worth ISD\u2019s current autonomy tier system, schools are allowed to go \u201coff-script\u201d at increasingly higher levels. Elevate, the lowest tier, has little room for autonomy, while the Emerge and Exemplar tiers have increased autonomy when delivering instruction.<\/p>\n The district\u2019s overall instructional framework, Cowtown 12, is followed district-wide. It includes first-teach lessons, and \u201cdemonstrations of learning\u201d intended to prove students are absorbing content by testing their knowledge at the end of lessons.<\/p>\n Licata and other district leaders say data backs up their approach. The district announced Thursday that Fort Worth ISD students performed better<\/a> on the beginning-of-year MAP tests this school year than they did last year in every STAAR-tested grade level.<\/p>\n While he is confident in the district\u2019s curriculum and instructional decisions, Licata admitted at a listening session<\/a> earlier this month that the district can always improve when it comes to informing parents about changes and taking their feedback into account.<\/p>\n \u201cOur communication can always be better,\u201d Licata said. \u201cI hear about transparency a lot. So when you say we aren\u2019t communicating well, you\u2019re right. I don\u2019t know how much more you want to get out of me, but you\u2019re right and I hear you. That\u2019s why we are sitting here [at the listening session] right now.\u201d<\/p>\n FWISD leaders expected early pushback, hope to earn support over time<\/p>\n As the school year gets further under way, Licata and other district leaders still remain hopeful that they will gain more community support over time, especially as they see improved student outcomes in the months ahead, Licata said.<\/p>\n District leaders prepared over the summer to be met with pushback over some of their decisions. Licata in particular prepared for apprehension from the moment TEA Commissioner Mike Morath appointed him as the district\u2019s leader. He previously told the Star-Telegram that he understands where concerned parents are coming from and believes their hearts are in the right place.<\/p>\n Results will come, but it will take time, he said. But in the meantime, the district\u2019s focus should remain on student outcomes and not outside noise, Licata added.<\/p>\n \u201cTurnaround work is hard because you have to change people\u2019s thinking and people\u2019s comfort zone,\u201d Licata said. \u201cBut we have an objective to do. We know this works, but we also know that a lot of people are anxious about what it\u2019s going to be. There is always going to be some angst against it because it\u2019s an intervention. That\u2019s not something I can change.\u201d<\/p>\n This story was originally published September 18, 2026 at 5:00 AM.<\/p>\n Related Stories from Fort Worth Star-Telegram<\/p>\n Fort Worth ISD Superintendent Peter Licata tours William Monnig Middle School during the end of the first week of school on Friday, Aug. 14, 2026, in Fort Worth. Amanda McCoy FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM <\/p>\n