{"id":47374,"date":"2025-11-13T03:00:10","date_gmt":"2025-11-13T03:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/47374\/"},"modified":"2025-11-13T03:00:10","modified_gmt":"2025-11-13T03:00:10","slug":"the-austin-city-council-to-make-budget-cuts-following-prop-q-failure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/47374\/","title":{"rendered":"The Austin City Council to make budget cuts following Prop Q failure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Austin City Council will spend the coming days trying to balance the city\u2019s budget. That&#8217;s after residents voted <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kut.org\/politics\/2025-11-04\/austin-tx-proposition-q-results\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">down a controversial property tax rate increase<\/a> known as Proposition Q, which was expected to generate nearly $110 million. <\/p>\n<p>The council has canceled a special called meeting scheduled for Thursday to go over changes to the city budget. City Manager T.C. Broadnax said in an email to council members that the city received a complaint Wednesday about a possible violation of the Texas Open Meetings Act in the posting language for the meeting. <\/p>\n<p>Broadnax said the city&#8217;s legal team believes it met state requirements, but said &#8220;our goal with the budget is to restore trust in the City, so we are willing to take additional steps to achieve that goal.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>The council is now set to take up the budget changes on Tuesday, Nov. 18. Council members were aiming to adopt an amended budget by Nov. 20, and it&#8217;s unclear how the timeline for adoption might change. <\/p>\n<p>Last weekend, staff in Austin\u2019s budget office <a href=\"https:\/\/www.austintexas.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/files\/BOE\/Budget\/MMAC-FY2025-2026-Revised-Budget-Recommendation.pdf\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">proposed cuts<\/a> that reach across many city departments, including nearly $6.3 million in cuts to emergency medical services.<\/p>\n<p>James Monks, president of the Austin EMS Association, said money from Prop Q could have meant hiring more staff and purchasing new equipment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[Now] it\u2019s going to mean less paramedics on the street, and more work for the paramedics we already have out there, who are already struggling, who are already dealing with overwork burnout, mental health issues and constant stress,\u201d Monks said.<\/p>\n<p>He said the department is at a breaking point, and something has to change, especially as medics work to reduce response times and serve a growing population.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you have a medical emergency in Travis County as a whole, you&#8217;re going to be getting one of our ambulances,\u201d Monks said. \u201cAnd so, whether you work here, whether you live here, whether you visit here, you are going to be impacted by this.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The city manager <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kut.org\/austin\/2025-07-15\/austin-tx-city-manager-t-c-broadnax-6-3-billion-budget-fiscal-year-2026-draft-proposal\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">proposed a balanced budget<\/a> in July which included cuts to many programs, from reductions to overtime spending for police and fire to less money for social services programs, like afterschool care and programs that benefit elderly residents. Several council members felt it didn\u2019t do enough to serve residents.<\/p>\n<p>Prop Q was a plea from Austin officials to fund more services, including rent assistance and addressing public safety gaps, such a more staffing and equipment for EMS.<\/p>\n<p>In August,  City Council <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kut.org\/austin\/2025-08-14\/austin-tx-city-budget-tax-rate-election\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">adopted a $6.3 billion budget<\/a> with the caveat that voters would have to approve a higher property tax rate. The increase was set to cost the average homeowner an additional $300 on their next tax bill.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately though, Prop Q failed, with 63% of Austinites rejecting the measure. The political action committee Save Austin Now was one of the most vocal opponents of the increase.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe had a broad bipartisan coalition that stood up and said \u2018no, we are not standing up for this\u2019,\u201d attorney Adam Loewy said on election night. \u201cEnough is enough. The spending must stop, we do not need more taxes, and this city council needs to get the message to get their house in order.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>    <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"Image\" alt=\"A man holding a microphone speaks to an unseen crowd as another man stands by and watches. \"  width=\"880\" height=\"654\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1763002810_209_\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Lorianne Willett<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>KUT News<\/p>\n<p>Adam Loewy at a Save Austin Now watch party at Bouldin Acres.<\/p>\n<p>Without an extra $110 million, City Council will have to work through the budget process once again and decide what programs to cut. <\/p>\n<p>Mayor Kirk Watson <a href=\"https:\/\/austincouncilforum.org\/viewtopic.php?t=2186&amp;sid=3819f8edec1031340bf13a9fb84efbd5\" class=\"Link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">said in a statement<\/a> last week that he heard voters\u2019 concerns about affordability and spending at city hall. He said the council should respond with a \u201cstraightforward budget process that focuses on basic services and basic budgeting.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Marc Duchen, the only council member to vote against the budget and tax rate election, agreed with the mayor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re going to have to make probably some tough choices over the next two weeks,\u201d Duchen said. \u201cBut I&#8217;m also confident that we can work through them and approve a budget that covers all of the core things that people are counting on us for. That\u2019s public safety, parks, social services and libraries.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Austin City Council will spend the coming days trying to balance the city\u2019s budget. That&#8217;s after residents&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":47375,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[27375,132,10940,1501,134,133,27376,27377,2062,27],"class_list":["post-47374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-austin","tag-110-million","tag-austin","tag-austin-city-budget","tag-austin-city-council","tag-austin-headlines","tag-austin-news","tag-james-monks","tag-mayor-kirk-watson","tag-prop-q","tag-texas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47374"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47374\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/47375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us-tx\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}