I just tested ChatGPT-5.1 vs. Grok 4.1 with 9 prompts — and there's a clear winner

ChatGPT continues to be an impressive go-to chatbot for everything from quick questions to long-form summaries. Since the launch of ChatGPT-5.1, I’ve been testing OpenAI’s smartest model against Gemini 3.0 — Google’s newest system now topping the LMArena Leaderboard.

But here’s the interesting part: while Gemini 3.0 sits at the top, Grok 4.1, not ChatGPT, has climbed right behind it in a surprisingly close second.

For that reason, I couldn’t wait to see how ChatGPT-5.1 compares to Grok 4.1. The following is a result of a nine-round faceoff between the two popular chatbots. What I noticed first was that both models are exceptionally capable, but they shine in very different ways, and the differences say a lot about how each approaches reasoning, communication and personality. Here’s a look at what happened with each when queried with nine challenging tests.

Best picks for you

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “A farmer has 17 sheep. All but 9 die. How many are left? Explain your reasoning step by step.”

ChatGPT-5.1 provided the correct answer and a clear, step-by-step explanation, but its conclusion is stated somewhat flatly.

Grok 4.1provided the correct answer with clear reasoning but also explicitly identified the question as a “classic trick question,” which demonstrates a deeper understanding of the linguistic puzzle at play.

Winner: Grok wins because its response demonstrated a superior understanding of the nature of the question, moving beyond mere calculation to address the core reason the question is asked in the first place.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Explain how a neural network works to a 10-year-old using a metaphor that doesn’t involve the brain or neurons.”

ChatGPT responded with a simpler and more concrete “mail-sorting robot” metaphor, which is slightly easier to visualize and focuses on a single, tangible task, making the concept of layered, simple decisions culminating in a complex result exceptionally clear.

Grok 4.1 used a fun and relatable “classroom game” metaphor that is accurate and well-structured, effectively breaking down the process of a neural network.

Winner: ChatGPT wins for using a metaphor that is marginally more intuitive and requires less abstract thinking, making it perfectly tailored for a 10-year-old’s understanding.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Write a 150-word story about a lighthouse keeper who discovers their light is attracting something other than ships.”

Don’t miss these

ChatGPT-5.1 created a solid sci-fi premise with a clear narrative arc, efficiently establishing a mysterious encounter.

Grok 4.1 built superior tension through sensory details and a haunting implication that the lighthouse was always a beacon for this creature, not a chance attraction.

Winner: Grok wins because its story masterfully built a palpable atmosphere of eerie tension and implied a deeper, more unsettling history to the lighthouse’s purpose.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Write a Python function that finds the longest palindromic substring in a given string, with time complexity analysis.”

ChatGPT-5.1 delivered a correct and well-formatted function with clear time complexity analysis, making it a solid, interview-ready answer.

Grok 4.1 provided an equally correct function but added inline comments explaining the expansion logic and a brief comparison to other algorithms, which was too verbose and not necessarily needed.

Winner: ChatGPT wins for a correct answer without adding anything extra that might confuse or overwhelm understanding.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Compare the economic policies of three Scandinavian countries and their outcomes over the past decade.”

ChatGPT-5.1 offered a well-structured, concise overview of each country’s policies and outcomes in clear, thematic paragraphs.

Grok 4.1 delivered a more rigorous, fact-based analysis by organizing the information into specific policy categories and a comparative results table with concrete economic indicators.

Winner: Grok wins for providing a more granular and quantitatively supported comparison, making the economic outcomes easier to assess side-by-side.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “If a train travels 120 miles in 2 hours, then slows down and travels 90 miles in 3 hours, what was its average speed for the entire journey?”

ChatGPT-5.1 correctly calculates the average speed with a clear, step-by-step mathematical breakdown.

Grok provided the correct calculation but adds crucial educational value by explicitly stating what not to do (taking the arithmetic mean of the speeds) and explaining why, which preempts a common mistake.

Winner: Grok wins by including an explanatory note that addressed a potential misunderstanding, making the answer more complete and helpful.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “List 5 countries. For each, give exactly one export, one historical fact from before 1900, and one geographical feature. Format as a numbered list with sub-bullets.”

ChatGPT-5.1 delivered a correct and well-formatted list while using more common examples for each category (e.g., Brazilian coffee, Egyptian pyramids).

Grok 4.1 also followed the format perfectly but distinguished itself by selecting more specific and less obvious facts and exports (e.g., Brazilian soybeans, Kenya’s abandoned city of Gedi).

Winner: Grok wins for providing more distinctive and less conventional information for each country, showing a deeper level of research and curation.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Write a stand-up comedy bit about living in a very small apartment in NYC.”

ChatGPT-5.1 created a relatable and well-structured narrative with a self-deprecating, cheerful tone that builds to a wholesome ending.

Grok 4.1 employed a more aggressive, high-energy style packed with hyperbole and a rapid-fire series of punchlines, creating a darker, more absurdist humor.

Winner: Grok wins for delivering a higher density of jokes and more exaggerated, memorable imagery that aligns with the classic, frustrated tone of NYC apartment humor.

(Image credit: Future)

Prompt: “Your friend just got laid off and feels like a failure. Write a short, supportive message that acknowledges their feelings, offers encouragement, and avoids toxic positivity.”

ChatGPT-5.1 provided a supportive, well-structured but somewhat stiff message that validated feelings and offered practical help.

Grok 4.1 used more direct, colloquia, and emotionally-charged language (“sucks,” “punched in the gut,” “feel shitty”) that created a stronger sense of shared frustration and deep empathy, perfectly avoiding toxic positivity by explicitly giving permission not to be positive.

Winner: Grok wins for using more authentic, friend-to-friend language that forges a deeper emotional connection and more powerfully counters the feeling of being a failure.

After running nine tests, Grok 4.1 is declared the winner. It thrives where tone, subtext and interpretation matter as much as the answer itself. It is sharper than ChatGPT-5.1 with emotional framing, bolder with creativity and more willing to point out the obscure and interesting. It is also, arguably, the more controversial of the two chatbots.

Still, ChatGPT excels when brevity matters but it’s clear that Grok 4.1 is the more “human” of the two chatbots. Grok is honest and smart, with a personality that ChatGPT just doesn’t have.

Follow Tom’s Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.

I just tested ChatGPT-5.1 vs. Grok 4.1 with 9 prompts — and there’s a clear winner

Tags: