Elon Musk recently said that there is no reason to save for retirement because in the near future, AI will be so productive and efficient that every person will have “universal high income.” A more realistic future looks like this: a recently launched website lets humans sign up to be hired by AI agents to complete tasks for them in “meatspace.”
The site, RentAHuman.ai, was built by crypto software engineer Alexander Liteplo. While it launched over the weekend to little fanfare, Liteplo started promoting the platform on Monday and saw sign-ups skyrocket. According to the site, it currently has 70,000 humans who have signed up to make themselves available to complete tasks on behalf of AI agents, getting paid by the gig. As with everything about this project and the emergent AI-Agent world, take that figure with a grain of salt.
Introducing https://t.co/iWBlnCAMkv
Autonomous agents are cool but stuck in the digital form. Now molties 🦞 and other autonomous agents can hit up the RentAHuman MCP server to hire real humans to do IRL tasks. pic.twitter.com/hOGbG1gt6A
— Alex (@AlexanderTw33ts) February 2, 2026
So, first question: Is this real or a surprisingly sharp satire of how we are so incapable of even imagining an escape from wage slavery that we willingly volunteer our bodies to robots? While it would appear like it’d be the latter with the promotional material for the site claiming to be the “meatpsace layer for AI” and saying “robots need your body,” it decidedly is not satire. By all accounts, it seems like Liteplo built the platform with the intention of it actually working as advertised—and the most annoying people you know are already attaching more jargon to it to make it seem like some incredible innovation rather than a portal to a deeply dehumanizing hellscape. “With AI agents hiring humans, we might see a new layer – humans as ‘API endpoints’ for AI systems,” one person wrote on Product Hunt.
So then, does it actually work? That is even more dubious than its intentions. While plenty of humans have signed up for the platform, there are currently only about 70 AI agents connected. That’s a 1:1000 task giver to task doer ratio, which frankly probably isn’t much worse than what you’d get with the Fiverrs and TaskRabbits of the world.
There are “real” tasks on the platform. The most popular appears to be one asking a human to hold a sign to promote an AI company, and others have found tasks like picking up a package from a post office or eating a pasta dish at a restaurant. But it’s a bit dubious to suggest these are tasks created by AI agents acting autonomously—and that it’ll be profitable for humans. For instance, the “hold a sign” task isn’t really a task so much as a competition. The post asks people to do the task, take pictures, and send them to a Twitter account, which will pick the top three submissions to pay. Everyone else gets nothing.
Liteplo posted on Wednesday on X to highlight an example of how the platform is being used. “Ok this is actually insane real companies are using rentahuman to advertise their business IRL,” he wrote. And while that’s true in the literal sense, the company he showed using the platform is a company he works for. So is that “insane,” or is that in and of itself the marketing trick, regardless of whether anyone actually claims and completes the task?
I’ve only found one person who claims to have actually completed a task and gotten paid for it thus far: Pierre Vannier, CEO of a startup called Flint Company. “One agent rented me for checking on all API_KEYS in the env files. I checked it’s ok now,” he wrote on Twitter. He also revealed something important about the payment: It’s in crypto, not cash. Altan Tutar, the co-founder of “crypto-native earning platform” MoreMarkets, found that only 13% of users who have signed up for RentAHuman have actually connected a wallet to the platform, suggesting most people think this is more novelty than reality.
It also points to something that is worth keeping an eye on: A lot of the projects that have come out of the OpenClaw/Moltbot project have come from crypto bros. RentAHuman is the creation of a crypto engineer, and the AI agent “social network” Moltbook was made by Matt Schlicht, who comes from a crypto background. Several of the smaller projects that have cropped up from this space have also come from folks who have previously or still work on crypto projects.
They are also all leaning heavily on vibe coding, for better or worse. When Liteplo was informed of issues on RentAHuman, he responded by saying, “claude is trying to fix it right now”—Claude being Anthropic’s AI model, not a guy named Claude. Moltbook was revealed to have some major security flaws, and when the creator of the platform was made aware of it, he said that he was going to have AI fix it. Even OpenClaw, the open-source AI agent that was the inspiration for Moltbook, has been plagued with security concerns since it first launched, and its creator, Peter Steinberger, has publicly stated, “I ship code I never read.”
All of that is to say, you probably shouldn’t sign up for RentAHuman for a variety of reasons: security concerns, lack of actual opportunity, and protecting your own dignity by not renting your body out to bots. Take your pick, just don’t sell yourself out.