Add Silicon Canals to your Google News feed.

My dad turned 67 this year. He spent three decades running a small business, and before that he spent a decade learning how to run a small business by watching his own father fail at one. He coached my brother’s baseball team for six consecutive seasons. He rewired the kitchen when the electrician quoted too high. He drove four hours round-trip to pick up my cousin from a situation nobody in the family talks about anymore. He was the guy everyone called.

Last Thanksgiving, I called him at around 2 PM. He picked up on the first ring. Not the second. Not the third. The first. And there was something in his voice — not sadness exactly, more like a man who’d been sitting in a quiet room for a while and had almost forgotten what his own voice sounded like when aimed at another person.

“Just watching the game,” he said. But I could tell the TV wasn’t on.

Here’s the thing: my dad isn’t depressed. He’s not sick. He’s not suffering from some dramatic, diagnosable crisis that would mobilize the family group chat. He’s just… sitting there. In a house he maintained for forty years, surrounded by the evidence of everything he built, wondering when someone’s going to call him for a reason other than a leaky faucet or a tax question.

And he’s not alone in this. Not even close.

The Utility Trap

There’s a psychological pattern that doesn’t get talked about enough, probably because naming it makes people uncomfortable. It works like this: a person builds their entire identity around being needed. Being the fixer. The provider. The one who hosts, who coaches, who holds it all together. And for decades, it works. The phone rings constantly. The house is full. Their calendar is someone else’s calendar.

Then the kids grow up. The grandkids are busy. The neighbors moved. The friends from the old job drift. And slowly — so slowly that nobody notices it happening — the phone stops ringing. Or rather, it only rings when something’s broken.

Psychologists call this socioemotional selectivity — a theory developed by Stanford psychologist Laura Carstensen that describes how older adults narrow their social worlds, prioritizing emotionally meaningful relationships. But here’s what gets lost in the clinical framing: the narrowing isn’t always voluntary. Sometimes the world narrows around them. The adult children aren’t being cruel. They’re just busy, overwhelmed, raising their own families, managing their own crises. They still love their parents. They just forgot that love requires presence, not just intention.

And the parent sitting in the quiet living room? They’d never say they’re lonely. That word feels too fragile for someone who spent forty years being the strongest person in every room. So they say they’re “fine.” They say they’re “just relaxing.” They say they “don’t need much.”

Sound familiar?

Elderly man holding a coffee cup, sitting alone on a bench indoors.
The Identity That Worked Too Well

I think about my dad’s generation a lot. The men and women who were taught that providing was the language of love — that showing up, fixing things, staying employed, keeping the house standing, putting food on the table — that was the emotional expression. They weren’t withholding affection. They were pouring it into every repaired screen door and every overtime shift and every holiday meal that took two days to prepare.

The problem is that when you build your identity exclusively around utility, you become invisible the moment you stop being useful.

Research on role loss and identity disruption in older adults shows that retirement, empty nesting, and reduced physical capacity don’t just change what people do — they destabilize who people believe themselves to be. When your entire self-concept was built around being the person everyone relies on, and then suddenly no one relies on you, the psychological ground shifts beneath you.

My dad doesn’t know how to call me just to talk. Not because he doesn’t want to — because he was never taught that wanting connection, by itself, was a valid enough reason to pick up the phone. He needs a reason. A question about my car insurance. A heads-up about weather. An article he saw that he thought I might find interesting. Always a pretext. Never just: “I wanted to hear your voice.”

And honestly? I wasn’t much better at calling without a reason either. That took me years of therapy to even recognize.

The Quiet Epidemic Nobody’s Naming

Loneliness among older adults isn’t a new finding. The U.S. Surgeon General declared it a public health crisis. But here’s what bothers me about how we talk about it: we frame it as if lonely older people are the ones who failed at building connections. As if they didn’t show up. As if they didn’t pour fifty years of labor and love into families and communities.

They didn’t fail at connection. They succeeded so thoroughly at being needed that everyone around them confused needing them with knowing them.

The generation now in their 70s and 80s carries irreplaceable knowledge — not just practical skills, but emotional wisdom, family history, contextual understanding of what it means to endure. And we’re letting it sit in quiet living rooms, untouched, because we’re too busy to call unless we need something fixed.

A 2019 study published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships found that perceived relational devaluation — the feeling of being less important to others than you once were — was a stronger predictor of depressive symptoms in older adults than actual social isolation. Read that again. It’s not being alone that destroys people. It’s the sense that they’ve been demoted from essential to optional.

Think about that for a second. The man who coached every Saturday, who built the deck, who drove sixteen hours for a holiday that lasted two days — he’s not crushed by solitude. He’s crushed by the slow, creeping realization that his phone only lights up when something needs fixing.

A lone person walking on a tranquil beach shore in Reykjavík, Iceland, under a clear blue sky.
What We Get Wrong About “Checking In”

After that Thanksgiving call, I started calling my dad more. But here’s what I noticed about myself: my first instinct was always to manufacture a reason. “Hey Dad, quick question about the furnace filter.” “Hey Dad, do you still have that socket wrench set?” I was doing the same thing he does — hiding connection behind utility.

The first time I called and just said, “Nothing’s wrong, I just wanted to talk,” there was a pause on his end that lasted maybe three full seconds. Which doesn’t sound like much. But if you’ve ever sat in three seconds of silence with a 67-year-old man who doesn’t know what to do with being wanted instead of needed, you know those seconds contain entire decades of conditioning.

He didn’t say anything emotional. He said, “Well, alright then.” And then he told me about a bird that had been coming to the feeder every morning. A specific bird, with specific markings, that he’d been tracking for weeks. He’d never mentioned it before. Because who calls their kid about a bird?

But that bird was his whole morning. That bird was the thing he was looking forward to. And nobody had asked.

There’s a reason aging fathers sit in the car for ten minutes after pulling into the driveway. It’s the same reason they spend forty-five minutes at the hardware store buying one bolt. These are the margins of a life that used to be full, and now those margins are all that’s left.

The Thing Nobody Wants to Admit

Here’s the part that’s hard to write. After my second startup collapsed — after I burned through investor money for eighteen months and lost my girlfriend because I couldn’t be present for a single conversation that wasn’t about runway — I went through a period where nobody called me either. Not because I was old, but because I’d made myself useful to everyone in a professional context and invisible in a personal one. When the company died, so did the phone calls.

I was 28. And for about four months, the silence was the loudest thing in my life.

It took therapy. It took a men’s group. It took learning, painfully, that being wanted isn’t the same as being needed, and that the second one is a much lonelier way to live.

My dad never had a men’s group. His generation didn’t do that. They had family dinners, and they had work, and they had a role to fill. And when the role ended, nobody handed them a script for what comes next.

So they sit. In houses they built. With skills nobody asks about. Watching birds nobody knows the names of.

What Changes This

I don’t have a five-step framework for fixing generational loneliness. I’m not going to pretend a listicle solves this.

But I know what shifted things between me and my dad. It wasn’t a grand gesture. It was frequency. Short calls. No agenda. Asking about things that had nothing to do with what he could do for me. “What’d you have for lunch?” “How’s that bird?” “Did you watch anything good?”

Research on intergenerational contact and well-being in later life consistently shows that it’s not the length or depth of contact that matters most — it’s the regularity. Frequent, low-stakes interaction. The kind that says: you’re not a resource to me. You’re a person I want to hear from.

My dad still doesn’t call me just to talk. That might never change. Forty years of conditioning doesn’t dissolve because his son read some psychology papers. But he picks up faster now. And he talks longer. And last week, he sent me a photo of the bird — unprompted, no pretext, just the bird — with a one-word text: “Tuesday.”

I knew exactly what he meant. The bird comes on Tuesdays.

And he wanted me to know.

Not because something was broken. Just because he was there, and he wanted someone else to be there too.

That’s not a small thing. For a man who spent his entire life being the one who fixed everything for everyone — that might be the bravest thing he’s ever done.