Manin, Y. Computable and Uncomputable (Sovetskoye Radio, 1980).

Feynman, R. P. in Feynman and Computation, 133–153 (CRC Press, 2018).

Peruzzo, A. et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Arute, F. et al. Observation of separated dynamics of charge and spin in the Fermi–Hubbard model. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.07965 (2020).

Farrell, R. C., Illa, M., Ciavarella, A. N. & Savage, M. J. Scalable circuits for preparing ground states on digital quantum computers: the Schwinger model vacuum on 100 qubits. PRX Quantum 5, 020315 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Acharya, R. et al. Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit. Nature 614, 676–681 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58–65 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Paetznick, A. et al. Demonstration of logical qubits and repeated error correction with better-than-physical error rates. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.02280 (2024).

Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Abrams, D. S. & Lloyd, S. Simulation of many-body Fermi systems on a universal quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2586–2589 (1997).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ortiz, G., Gubernatis, J., Knill, E. & Laflamme, R. Quantum algorithms for fermionic simulations. Phys. Rev. A 64, 022319 (2001).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lanyon, B. P. et al. Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer. Nat. Chem. 2, 106–111 (2010).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wecker, D., Bauer, B., Clark, B. K., Hastings, M. B. & Troyer, M. Gate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers. Phys. Rev. A 90, 022305 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D. & Troyer, M. Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7555–7560 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704–1707 (2005).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers. Mol. Phys. 109, 735–750 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cao, Y. et al. Quantum chemistry in the age of quantum computing. Chem. Rev. 119, 10856–10915 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bauer, B., Bravyi, S., Motta, M. & Chan, G. K.-L. Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry and quantum materials science. Chem. Rev. 120, 12685–12717 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C. & Yuan, X. Quantum computational chemistry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015003 (2020).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Motta, M. & Rice, J. E. Emerging quantum computing algorithms for quantum chemistry. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1580 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kassal, I., Jordan, S. P., Love, P. J., Mohseni, M. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Polynomial-time quantum algorithm for the simulation of chemical dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18681–18686 (2008).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Sawaya, N. P. D. & Huh, J. Quantum algorithm for calculating molecular vibronic spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 3586–3591 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ollitrault, P. J., Mazzola, G. & Tavernelli, I. Nonadiabatic molecular quantum dynamics with quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260511 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Miessen, A., Ollitrault, P. J., Tacchino, F. & Tavernelli, I. Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics. Nat. Comp. Sci. 3, 25–37 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

O’Malley, P. J. J. et al. Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031007 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Kandala, A. et al. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature 549, 242 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Colless, J. I. et al. Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm. Phys. Rev. X 8, 011021 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Hempel, C. et al. Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031022 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Google AI Quantum and Collaborators et al. Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer. Science 369, 1084–1089 (2020).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Navickas, T. et al. Experimental quantum simulation of chemical dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 23566–23573 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Hubbard, J. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 276, 238–257 (1963).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Oftelie, L. B. et al. Simulating quantum materials with digital quantum computers. Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 043002 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wecker, D. et al. Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 92, 062318 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cade, C., Mineh, L., Montanaro, A. & Stanisic, S. Strategies for solving the Fermi-Hubbard model on near-term quantum computers. Phys. Rev. B 102, 235122 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

García-Ripoll, J. J., Solano, E. & Martin-Delgado, M. A. Quantum simulation of Anderson and Kondo lattices with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. B 77, 024522 (2008).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bravyi, S. & Gosset, D. Complexity of quantum impurity problems. Commun. Math. Phys. 356, 451–500 (2017).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Jamet, F. et al. Anderson impurity solver integrating tensor network methods with quantum computing. APL Quantum 2, 016121 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Rubin, N. C. et al. Fault-tolerant quantum simulation of materials using Bloch orbitals. PRX Quantum 4, 040303 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Clinton, L. et al. Towards near-term quantum simulation of materials. Nat. Commun. 15, 211 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Berry, D. W. et al. Quantum simulation of realistic materials in first quantization using non-local pseudopotentials. npj Quantum Inf. 10, 130 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bauer, B., Wecker, D., Millis, A. J., Hastings, M. B. & Troyer, M. Hybrid quantum-classical approach to correlated materials. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031045 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Haah, J., Hastings, M. B., Kothari, R. & Low, G. H. Quantum algorithm for simulating real time evolution of lattice Hamiltonians. SIAM J. Comput. 52, FOCS18–250 (2021).

MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Babbush, R. et al. Low-depth quantum simulation of materials. Phys. Rev. X 8, 011044 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Kogut, J. & Susskind, L. Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Nielsen, H. B. & Ninomiya, M. Absence of neutrinos on a lattice: (I). Proof by homotopy theory. Nucl. Phys. B 185, 20–40 (1981).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. & Preskill, J. Quantum computation of scattering in scalar quantum field theories. Quant. Inf. Comput. 14, 1014–1080 (2011).

MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. & Preskill, J. Quantum algorithms for quantum field theories. Science 336, 1130–1133 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jordan, S. P., Krovi, H., Lee, K. S. & Preskill, J. BQP-completeness of scattering in scalar quantum field theory. Quantum 2, 44 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jordan, S. P., Lee, K. S. & Preskill, J. Quantum algorithms for fermionic quantum field theories. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.7115 (2014).

García-Álvarez, L. et al. Fermion-fermion scattering in quantum field theory with superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 070502 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Zohar, E. & Cirac, J. I. Removing staggered fermionic matter in U(N) and SU(N) lattice gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D 99, 114511 (2019).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Lamm, H., Lawrence, S., Yamauchi, Y. & Collaboration, N. General methods for digital quantum simulation of gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D 100, 034518 (2019).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Banuls, M. C. et al. Simulating lattice gauge theories within quantum technologies. Eur. Phys. J. D 74, 1–42 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kan, A. & Nam, Y. Lattice quantum chromodynamics and electrodynamics on a universal quantum computer. Quant. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aca0b8 (2021).

Tong, Y., Albert, V. V., McClean, J. R., Preskill, J. & Su, Y. Provably accurate simulation of gauge theories and bosonic systems. Quantum 6, 816 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bauer, C. W. et al. Quantum simulation for high-energy physics. PRX Quantum 4, 027001 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bauer, C. W., Davoudi, Z., Klco, N. & Savage, M. J. Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 420–432 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Irmejs, R., Bañuls, M.-C. & Cirac, J. I. Quantum simulation of \({{\rm{{\mathbb{Z}}}}}_{2}\) lattice gauge theory with minimal resources. Phys. Rev. D 108, 074503 (2023).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Lamm, H., Li, Y.-Y., Shu, J., Wang, Y.-L. & Xu, B. Block encodings of discrete subgroups on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. D 110, 054505 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Rhodes, M. L., Kreshchuk, M. & Pathak, S. Exponential improvements in the simulation of lattice gauge theories using near-optimal techniques. PRX Quantum 5, 040347 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Watson, J. D. et al. Quantum algorithms for simulating nuclear effective field theories. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.05344 (2023).

Schwinger, J. Gauge invariance and mass. II. Phys. Rev. 128, 2425 (1962).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Kühn, S., Cirac, J. I. & Bañuls, M.-C. Quantum simulation of the Schwinger model: a study of feasibility. Phys. Rev. A 90, 042305 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Alexandru, A. et al. Gluon field digitization for quantum computers. Phys. Rev. D 100, 114501 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Davoudi, Z., Raychowdhury, I. & Shaw, A. Search for efficient formulations for Hamiltonian simulation of non-Abelian lattice gauge theories. Phys. Rev. D 104, 074505 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S. & Sipser, M. Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0001106 (2000).

Albash, T. & Lidar, D. A. Adiabatic quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Kato, T. On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 5, 435–439 (1950).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lee, S. et al. Evaluating the evidence for exponential quantum advantage in ground-state quantum chemistry. Nat. Commun. 14, 1952 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kitaev, A. Y. Quantum measurements and the Abelian stabilizer problem. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9511026 (1995).

Temme, K., Osborne, T. J., Vollbrecht, K. G., Poulin, D. & Verstraete, F. Quantum metropolis sampling. Nature 471, 87–90 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, C.-F., Kastoryano, M. J., Brandão, F. G. & Gilyén, A. Quantum thermal state preparation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18224 (2023).

Chen, C.-F., Kastoryano, M. J. & Gilyén, A. An efficient and exact noncommutative quantum Gibbs sampler. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.09207 (2023).

Cubitt, T. S. Dissipative ground state preparation and the dissipative quantum eigensolver. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11962 (2023).

Zhang, D., Bosse, J. L. & Cubitt, T. Dissipative quantum Gibbs sampling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.04526 (2023).

Endo, S., Kurata, I. & Nakagawa, Y. O. Calculation of the Green’s function on near-term quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033281 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Keen, T., Dumitrescu, E. & Wang, Y. Quantum algorithms for ground-state preparation and Green’s function calculation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.05731 (2021).

Irmejs, R. & Santos, R. A. Approximating dynamical correlation functions with constant depth quantum circuits. Quantum 9, 1639 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Piccinelli, S., Tacchino, F., Tavernelli, I. & Carleo, G. Efficient calculation of Green’s functions on quantum computers via simultaneous circuit perturbation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.05563 (2025).

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050–1057 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Elben, A. et al. The randomized measurement toolbox. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 9–24 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Busch, P. Informationally complete sets of physical quantities. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30, 1217–1227 (1991).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Zhao, A., Rubin, N. C. & Miyake, A. Fermionic partial tomography via classical shadows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 110504 (2021).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Wan, K., Huggins, W. J., Lee, J. & Babbush, R. Matchgate shadows for fermionic quantum simulation. Commun. Math. Phys. 404, 629–700 (2023).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Low, G. H. Classical shadows of fermions with particle number symmetry. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.08964 (2022).

King, R., Gosset, D., Kothari, R. & Babbush, R. Triply efficient shadow tomography. PRX Quantum 6, 010336 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–1078 (1996).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Suzuki, M. General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics. J. Math. Phys. 32, 400–407 (1991).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Campbell, E. Random compiler for fast Hamiltonian simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070503 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Childs, A. M., Ostrander, A. & Su, Y. Faster quantum simulation by randomization. Quantum 3, 182 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, C.-F., Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Tropp, J. A. Concentration for random product formulas. PRX Quantum 2, 040305 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Faehrmann, P. K., Steudtner, M., Kueng, R., Kieferova, M. & Eisert, J. Randomizing multi-product formulas for Hamiltonian simulation. Quantum 6, 806 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Cho, C.-H., Berry, D. W. & Hsieh, M.-H. Doubling the order of approximation via the randomized product formula. Phys. Rev. A 109, 062431 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Kivlichan, I. D. et al. Improved fault-tolerant quantum simulation of condensed-phase correlated electrons via Trotterization. Quantum 4, 296 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bosse, J. L. et al. Efficient and practical Hamiltonian simulation from time-dependent product formulas. Nat. Commun. 16, 2673 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Childs, A. M. & Su, Y. Nearly optimal lattice simulation by product formulas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050503 (2019).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Tran, M. C., Wiebe, N. & Zhu, S. Theory of Trotter error with commutator scaling. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011020 (2021).


Google Scholar
 

Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 010501 (2017).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum 3, 163 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gilyén, A., Su, Y., Low, G. H. & Wiebe, N. Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics. In Proc. 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing 193–204 (ACM, 2019).

Motlagh, D. & Wiebe, N. Generalized quantum signal processing. PRX Quantum 5, 020368 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Childs, A. M. & Wiebe, N. Hamiltonian simulation using linear combinations of unitary operations. Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 901– 924 (2012).

MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Babbush, R. et al. Encoding electronic spectra in quantum circuits with linear T complexity. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041015 (2018).


Google Scholar
 

Berry, D. W. & Childs, A. M. Black-box Hamiltonian simulation and unitary implementation. Quant. Inf. Comput. 12, 29–62 (2009).

MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Berry, D. W. et al. Improved techniques for preparing eigenstates of fermionic Hamiltonians. npj Quantum Inf. 4, 1–7 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Babbush, R., Berry, D. W., McClean, J. R. & Neven, H. Quantum simulation of chemistry with sublinear scaling in basis size. npj Quantum Inf. 5, 92 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Su, Y., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., Rubin, N. & Babbush, R. Fault-tolerant quantum simulations of chemistry in first quantization. PRX Quantum 2, 040332 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Babbush, R. et al. Quantum simulation of exact electron dynamics can be more efficient than classical mean-field methods. Nat. Commun. 14, 4058 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Georges, T. N. et al. Quantum simulations of chemistry in first quantization with any basis set. npj Quantum Inf. 11, 55 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Wick, G. C., Wightman, A. S. & Wigner, E. P. The Intrinsic Parity of Elementary Particles 102–106 (Springer, 1997).

Bravyi, S. B. & Kitaev, A. Y. Fermionic quantum computation. Ann. Phys. 298, 210–226 (2002).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Chien, R. W. & Klassen, J. Optimizing fermionic encodings for both Hamiltonian and hardware. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.05652 (2022).

Cobanera, E., Ortiz, G. & Nussinov, Z. The bond-algebraic approach to dualities. Adv. Phys. 60, 679–798 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jordan, P. & Wigner, E. About the Pauli exclusion principle. Z. Phys. 47, 631–651 (1928).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lieb, E., Schultz, T. & Mattis, D. Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain. Ann. Phys. 16, 407–466 (1961).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Chiew, M. & Strelchuk, S. Discovering optimal fermion–qubit mappings through algorithmic enumeration. Quantum 7, 1145 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Parella-Dilmé, T. et al. Reducing entanglement with physically inspired fermion-to-qubit mappings. PRX Quantum 5, 030333 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jones, N. C. et al. Faster quantum chemistry simulation on fault-tolerant quantum computers. New J. Phys. 14, 115023 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wan, K. Exponentially faster implementations of Select(H) for fermionic Hamiltonians. Quantum 5, 380 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Seeley, J. T., Richard, M. J., Love, P. J. & Love, P. J. The Bravyi-Kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure. J. Chem. Phys. 137, 224109 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Steudtner, M. & Wehner, S. Fermion-to-qubit mappings with varying resource requirements for quantum simulation. New J. Phys. 20, 063010 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bravyi, S., Gambetta, J. M., Mezzacapo, A. & Temme, K. Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.08213 (2017).

Wang, Q., Li, M., Monroe, C. & Nam, Y. Resource-optimized fermionic local-Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer for quantum chemistry. Quantum 5, 509 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wang, Q., Cian, Z.-P., Li, M., Markov, I. L. & Nam, Y. Ever more optimized simulations of fermionic systems on a quantum computer. In 2023 60th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) 1–6 (IEEE, 2023).

Miller, A., Zimborás, Z., Knecht, S., Maniscalco, S. & García-Pérez, G. Bonsai algorithm: grow your own fermion-to-qubit mappings. PRX Quantum 4, 030314 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Miller, A., Glos, A. & Zimborás, Z. Treespilation: architecture- and state-optimised fermion-to-qubit mappings. npj Quant. Inf. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01170-2 (2024).

Jiang, Z., Kalev, A., Mruczkiewicz, W. & Neven, H. Optimal fermion-to-qubit mapping via ternary trees with applications to reduced quantum states learning. Quantum 4, 276 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Vlasov, A. Y. Clifford algebras, spin groups and qubit trees. Quanta 11, 97–114 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chiew, M., Harrison, B. & Strelchuk, S. Ternary tree transformations are equivalent to linear encodings of the Fock basis. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07578 (2024).

McDowall-Rose, H., Shaikh, R. A. & Yeh, L. From fermions to qubits: a ZX-calculus perspective. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.06212 (2025).

Havlíček, V., Troyer, M. & Whitfield, J. D. Operator locality in the quantum simulation of fermionic models. Phys. Rev. A 95, 032332 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Harrison, B. et al. A Sierpinski triangle fermion-to-qubit transform. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.04348 (2024).

Yu, J., Liu, Y., Sugiura, S., Voorhis, T. V. & Zeytinoğlu, S. Clifford circuit based heuristic optimization of fermion-to-qubit mappings. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 9430–9443 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Arcos, M., Apel, H. & Cubitt, T. Encodings of observable subalgebras. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.20591 (2025).

Setia, K. et al. Reducing qubit requirements for quantum simulations using molecular point group symmetries. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 6091–6097 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Shee, Y., Tsai, P.-K., Hong, C.-L., Cheng, H.-C. & Goan, H.-S. Qubit-efficient encoding scheme for quantum simulations of electronic structure. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023154 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Harrison, B., Nelson, D., Adamiak, D. & Whitfield, J. Reducing the qubit requirement of Jordan-Wigner encodings of N-mode, K-fermion systems from N to \(\lceil {\log }_{2}(\begin{array}{c}N\\ K\end{array})\rceil \). Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.04501 (2023).

Kirby, W., Fuller, B., Hadfield, C. & Mezzacapo, A. Second-quantized fermionic operators with polylogarithmic qubit and gate complexity. PRX Quantum 3, 020351 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Carolan, J. & Schaeffer, L. Succinct fermion data structures. In 16th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ed. Meka, R.) Vol. 325 (ITCS, 2025).

Lieb, E. H. & Robinson, D. W. The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 28, 251–257 (1972).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Hastings, M. B. in Quantum Theory from Small to Large Scales: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School Vol. 95, 171–212 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

Tran, M. C. et al. Locality and digital quantum simulation of power-law interactions. Phys. Rev. X 9, 031006 (2019).


Google Scholar
 

Bringewatt, J. & Davoudi, Z. Parallelization techniques for quantum simulation of fermionic systems. Quantum 7, 975 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ball, R. Fermions without fermion fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 176407 (2005).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Levin, M. & Wen, X.-G. Quantum ether: photons and electrons from a rotor model. Phys. Rev. B 73, 035122 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Verstaete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Mapping local Hamiltonians of fermions to local Hamiltonians of spins. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2005, P09012 (2005).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Steudtner, M. & Wehner, S. Quantum codes for quantum simulation of fermions on a square lattice of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 99, 022308 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Setia, K., Bravyi, S., Mezzacapo, A. & Whitfield, J. D. Superfast encodings for fermionic quantum simulation. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033033 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jiang, Z., McClean, J., Babbush, R. & Neven, H. Majorana loop stabilizer codes for error mitigation in fermionic quantum simulations. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 064041 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A. & Kapustin, A. Bosonization in three spatial dimensions and a 2-form gauge theory. Phys. Rev. B 100, 245127 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A. Exact bosonization in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033527 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chien, R. W. & Whitfield, J. D. Custom fermionic codes for quantum simulation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.11860 (2020).

Derby, C., Klassen, J., Bausch, J. & Cubitt, T. Compact fermion to qubit mappings. Phys. Rev. B 104, 035118 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Derby, C. & Klassen, J. A compact fermion to qubit mapping part 2: Alternative lattice geometries. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.10735 (2021).

Li, K. & Po, H. C. Higher-dimensional Jordan-Wigner transformation and auxiliary Majorana fermions. Phys. Rev. B 106, 115109 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A., Gorshkov, A. V. & Xu, Y. Error-correcting codes for fermionic quantum simulation. SciPost Phys. 16, 033 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Nys, J. & Carleo, G. Quantum circuits for solving local fermion-to-qubit mappings. Quantum 7, 930 (2023).


Google Scholar
 

Algaba, M. G., Sriluckshmy, P., Leib, M. & Šimkovic IV, F. Low-depth simulations of fermionic systems on square-grid quantum hardware. Quantum 8, 1327 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gottesman, D. Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology (1997).

Chien, R. W., Setia, K., Bonet-Monroig, X., Steudtner, M. & Whitfield, J. D. Simulating quantum error mitigation in fermionic encodings. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.02270 (2023).

Zhang, D. & Cubitt, T. Quantum error transmutation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.10278 (2023).

Šimkovic, F. IV, Leib, M. & Pereira, F. R. F. Low-weight high-distance error correcting fermionic encodings. Am. Phys. Soc. 6, 043123 (2024).


Google Scholar
 

Papič, M. et al. Near-term fermionic simulation with subspace noise tailored quantum error mitigation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.11785 (2025).

Algaba, M. G., Papič, M., de Vega, I., Calzona, A. & Šimkovic IV, F. Fermion-to-qubit encodings with arbitrary code distance. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.02916 (2025).

Landahl, A. J. & Morrison, B. C. Logical fermions for fault-tolerant quantum simulation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.10280 (2021).

Levin, M. & Wen, X.-G. Fermions, strings, and gauge fields in lattice spin models. Phys. Rev. B 67, 245316 (2003).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A., Kapustin, A. & Radičević, D. Exact bosonization in two spatial dimensions and a new class of lattice gauge theories. Ann. Phys. 393, 234–253 (2018).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Kitaev, A. Y. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2–30 (2003).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Walker, K. & Wang, Z. (3+1)-TQFTs and topological insulators. Front. Phys. 7, 150–159 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Tsui, L. & Wen, X.-G. Lattice models that realize \({{\rm{{\mathbb{Z}}}}}_{n}-1\) symmetry-protected topological states for even n. Phys. Rev. B 101, 035101 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A. & Tata, S. Higher cup products on hypercubic lattices: application to lattice models of topological phases. J. Math. Phys. 64, 091902 (2023).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Haah, J. Algebraic methods for quantum codes on lattices. Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas 50, 299–349 (2016).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, Y.-A. et al. Equivalence between fermion-to-qubit mappings in two spatial dimensions. PRX Quantum 4, 010326 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Guaita, T. On the locality of qubit encodings of local fermionic modes. Quantum 9, 1644 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bravyi, S., Hastings, M. B. & Verstraete, F. Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Higgott, O. et al. Optimal local unitary encoding circuits for the surface code. Quantum 5, 517 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

O’Brien, O. & Strelchuk, S. Ultrafast hybrid fermion-to-qubit mapping. Phys. Rev. B 109, 115149 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Babbush, R. et al. Exponentially more precise quantum simulation of fermions in the configuration interaction representation. Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 015006 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Low, G. H. et al. Fast quantum simulation of electronic structure by spectrum amplification. Phys. Rev. X 15, 041016 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Campbell, E. T. Early fault-tolerant simulations of the Hubbard model. Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 015007 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Luthra, S., Moylett, A. E., Browne, D. E. & Campbell, E. T. Unlocking early fault-tolerant quantum computing with mitigated magic dilution. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 045066 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Nigmatullin, R. et al. Experimental demonstration of break-even for the compact fermionic encoding. Nat. Phys. 21, 1319–1325 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Evered, S. J. et al. Probing the Kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 645, 341–347 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Tan, T. R. et al. Analog quantum simulation of chemical dynamics with a trapped-ion system. In APS Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Meeting Abstracts Vol. 2022, C08-005 (APS, 2022).

Flannigan, S. et al. Propagation of errors and quantitative quantum simulation with quantum advantage. Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 045025 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Trivedi, R., Franco Rubio, A. & Cirac, J. I. Quantum advantage and stability to errors in analogue quantum simulators. Nat. Commun. 15, 6507 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Liu, Y. et al. Toward mixed analog-digital quantum signal processing: quantum AD/DA conversion and the Fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 73, 3641 (2024).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Crane, E. et al. Hybrid oscillator-qubit quantum processors: simulating fermions, bosons, and gauge fields. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.03747 (2024).

Mudassar, M., Chien, R. W. & Gottesman, D. Encoding Majorana codes. Phys. Rev. A 110, 032430 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Schuckert, A., Crane, E., Gorshkov, A. V., Hafezi, M. & Gullans, M. J. Fermion-qubit fault-tolerant quantum computing. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.08955 (2024).