You’re somewhat concerned about a Kirill Kaprizov extension. You’re bullish on Marco Rossi being a top-six-caliber center.
And there’s still some cautious confidence in president and general manager Bill Guerin.
This was always going to be an important summer for the Minnesota Wild, with their superstar eligible for a long-term extension and the shackles of the Zach Parise-Ryan Suter buyouts finally off.
What better time to put together The Athletic’s annual Wild fan survey, which received 4,775 responses this year (thank you all!).
There were certainly some interesting answers in here, from the underwhelming offseason to Kaprizov and Rossi to the Filip Gustavsson-Jesper Wallstedt tandem. We took your temperature on many other topics, too, from the touted prospect pool to what core player you’re most open to trading to the next captain after Jared Spurgeon.
Here are last year’s survey results for comparison.
What’s your concern level on whether Kaprizov will sign an extension with him a year from free agency?
4,755 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Not concerned at all. He’s staying
51.4%
Somewhat concerned
42.5%
Very concerned
6.1%
Guerin said nobody should “panic” if Kaprizov wasn’t signed July 1, and we’re now almost at Aug. 1 and it’s still quiet. So it’d be understandable if there was some anxiety among the fan base. Instead, there’s more optimism than there was last year, when 28 percent of you said you were “very concerned.” Now, 51 percent of you are emphatic Kaprizov is staying (compared to just 17 percent last year).
There are good reasons for this, especially Kaprizov’s positive tone in his exit meeting press conference, saying about negotiations, “I love everything. It should be all good.” We broke down some burning questions recently around Kaprizov’s contract, and we’ll know more after Guerin and Kaprizov meet face-to-face before camp.
What do you think a Kaprizov extension will look like?
4,747 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
A seven- or eight-year term at between $14 and $15 million AAV
45.8%
A seven- or eight-year term at north of $15 million AAV
35.5%
A two- to four-year bridge deal
16.2%
A one-year extension
0.3%
He’s not re-signing
2.2%
The Wild would like to sign Kaprizov to a long-term deal and are the only team that can offer him eight years (one of their advantages). The prevailing belief among fans is that’s what will get it done, with over 80 percent of you believing it’ll be a seven- or eight-year term. It will be interesting to see, though, if Kaprizov actually prefers a shorter-term bridge deal to take advantage of the rising cap, plus put some pressure on Guerin to build a contender around him.
There are risks for both sides on a long-term deal, especially considering Kaprizov missed half of the season due to a surgery on a lower-body injury and will turn 29 by the time this extension starts.
What do you think a Rossi contract will look like?
4,756 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
A seven- or eight-year term at north of $6 million AAV
10.8%
A five-year term at around $5 million AAV
14.8%
A two- to four-year bridge deal
50.5%
A one-year contract
11.6%
He’s going to be traded
12.2%
Rossi turned down a five-year, $25 million extension last winter, and the reality is that’s below market value for a contract that long for a 60-point 23-year-old.
The comparable for a six- or seven-year term is north of $6.5 million and even in the $7 million range, judging by recent NHL signings, and the Wild are showing no appetite to go that long anyway at any price.
Even though Matt Boldy’s contract is more than two years old, the Wild aren’t willing to go to the same numbers because they feel Rossi isn’t Boldy.
So a two-year bridge deal seems the likely resolution, giving Minnesota two more years to evaluate Rossi and see if a player like Danila Yurov is the real deal.
What do you think of the Wild’s contract offers to Rossi (five years at a $5 million AAV or two years at under $5 million AAV)?
4,754 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Too rich
1.8%
Appropriate
49.0%
Under market value
49.2%
It’s fitting that you’re split on this, as the Wild and Rossi’s camp are in a pretty strong stalemate. The team feels its offers have been strong, but if you’re Rossi, betting on yourself, there’s reason to expect more.
There will have to be a compromise made here somewhere, especially as camp opens in mid-September. They’re playing a game of chicken but the Wild do need Rossi considering their center depth.
Yes, Rossi has no “rights” beyond an offer sheet because he’s not arbitration-eligible, but there’s leverage on Rossi’s side, too. A contract holdout into training camp or the season takes away a serious point producer.
What do you think Rossi will become?
4,758 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
No. 1 center
2.0%
Top-six center
80.1%
Third-line center
16.6%
Depth forward
1.3%
It’s hard to argue what 80.1 percent think. The Wild may even agree.
The big question is whether they want it to happen here. Plain and simple, the Wild aren’t sold on committing the term and dollars necessary to make Rossi the team’s second-line center of the future because they’re not sold on a player of his size and talent level in that spot being enough to get the team over the hump to be a consistent Stanley Cup contender.
There’s no denying Rossi’s courage and willingness to go to the dirty areas, but can he break down defenders in the playoffs with his undersized frame?
That’s the question that’s slowing progress in contract talks.
Craig Leipold predicted July 1 would be like “Christmas.” At this point this offseason, the Wild have traded for Vladimir Tarasenko, signed Nico Sturm and re-signed Marcus Johansson. How would you grade Guerin’s offseason?
4,759 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
A
3.4%
B
33.0%
C
41.8%
D
17.0%
F
4.9%
There was a lot of hype around what Guerin could do now that the dead cap hits from Parise and Suter are finally mostly off the books. So what the Wild did could be seen as underwhelming.
But it appears fans here are grading on a curve, with most people giving Guerin a B or a C. There were other factors in why Guerin couldn’t do more, as most teams kept their top free agents, so a lot of the big names didn’t even get to the market (including a top Wild target in Brock Nelson).
There weren’t many sellers during trade talks, Guerin said, as most teams wanted to get better. In that context, fans were pleased with Guerin’s restraint on July 1, which he said can be a “day of mistakes.”
Guerin indicated that not doing much this summer allows him to be in the market for some big fish during the season with trades, or even next summer.
Gustavsson has one year left on his contract. Would you sign him to an extension this offseason or wait to analyze his season and Wallstedt’s?
4,759 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Sign Gus now
52.8%
Wait and see
45.8%
Trade him. Wallstedt is the future
1.3%
Gustavsson is coming off a strong season, looking a lot more like the version from 2022-23 than the one that struggled in 2023-24.
The Swede showed he’s capable of being the Wild’s No. 1 of the present and potentially the future. He’s a great fit and beloved by teammates. That could give Guerin reason to pursue a contract extension this summer as opposed to waiting until he hits unrestricted free agency next offseason.
But while a little more than half of you are ready to commit to Gustavsson, the other half is in wait-and-see mode. That speaks to the belief remaining in Wallstedt, who is coming off a season he called “terrible.”
Wallstedt has been touted as the team’s goalie of the future since getting drafted in the first round, so the Wild could spend a little more time to see how he bounces back in his first full season in the NHL. Gustavsson did talk about how being a goalie partner with Wallstedt could have a different feel than his bond with mentor Marc-Andre Fleury.
What do you think Wallstedt will become?
4,752 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Superstar goaltender
3.1%
Solid No. 1 goalie
53.5%
Average No. 1 goalie
34.5%
Career backup
6.7%
Bust
2.2%
As much as Wallstedt struggled last season, there were some factors involved. He suffered three different injuries and played behind an AHL Iowa team that wasn’t very strong defensively or on the PK.
He has been among the best prospects in his age group for a long time, and he didn’t forget how to play goalie in one year.
The talent is there. The key is the mental side, and Wallstedt is betting on himself bouncing back, using Gustavsson’s summer “reset” as a model. The coaches in Iowa believe Wallstedt’s down year could be a blessing in disguise, showing him how to handle adversity during a season, which could help him in the NHL.
Your belief in Wallstedt being a superstar goalie dropped from 21 percent last year to 3.1 percent this year, though. Wallstedt knows this will be a big prove-it year to show he can acclimate. But if Wallstedt becomes a “solid No. 1 goalie,” like over 50 percent of you believe, the Wild will be happy.
Last fall, Guerin said Boldy had the ability to be a 50-goal, 50-assist guy. From what Boldy showed you last season and in the playoffs, what is his ceiling?
4,758 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Superstar
17.3%
Robin to Kirill Kaprizov’s Batman
57.3%
What he has been: a 30-goal, 70-point guy
25.5%
Boldy was terrific in the playoffs, forming a dynamic duo with Kaprizov. They were borderline unstoppable at times. That version of Boldy — the skilled scorer not afraid to go to the dirty areas — had superstar qualities and scored some big-time goals.
If the definition of “superstar” is a top-10 player, like Kaprizov, though, Boldy isn’t in that category yet. But there’s nothing wrong with being a Robin to Kaprizov’s Batman, like 57.3 percent of you voted. Plus, Boldy is only 24 years old, so he likely hasn’t reached his ceiling yet.
What kind of impact will Tarasenko have this season?
4,749 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
The St. Louis Blues version
3.9%
A consistent point producer
75.3%
The Detroit Red Wings version
20.8%
Few believe Tarasenko’s going to magically rekindle the consistent stardom he brought in St. Louis, when he scored 33 or more goals in six consecutive non-pandemic-shortened, 82-game seasons. He has slowed down.
But three-quarters of you are banking on what the Wild are: that he’ll earn a consistent top-six role that would allow him to play at even strength with Rossi or Joel Eriksson Ek alongside a mix of Boldy, Kaprizov and Mats Zuccarello.
If he produces in that role, the one-year gamble that brought him to Minnesota from Detroit for no assets will have been worth it.
Regardless of no-trade protection, which one of these core players would you be most open to trading?
4,730 responses
Spurgeon, 35, the second full-time captain in Wild history, has been a constant in Minnesota’s uniform since making his NHL debut on his 21st birthday in 2010.
He’s arguably the biggest success story in franchise history. If the Wild hadn’t given a contract to the former New York Islanders sixth-round pick after his drafting team let him go unsigned, he had one foot on a plane ready for a career overseas.
Instead, the Wild signed him and today he’s the franchise leader among defensemen in games played (933), goals (117) and points (416).
But with two years left on his contract and despite a solid season that saw him play 66 games as opposed to the 16 the year before, almost 44 percent of you are ready to cut ties. Ryan Hartman was a relatively close second after being suspended a fifth time last season, which cost him eight games at a tumultuous time in the season.
Who’s the Wild’s next captain after Spurgeon?
4,752 responses
This is an interesting question, and one the Wild probably won’t have to worry about for a couple of years with Spurgeon still under contract. There are some quality candidates here, from the Wild’s vocal heart-and-soul leader in Foligno to their superstar in Kaprizov to a perfect lead-by-example guy in Eriksson Ek, arguably the team’s most irreplaceable player.
But Faber makes a lot of sense. He plays, acts and talks like a captain and was one with the Gophers. He’s thoughtful, accountable and a franchise cornerstone (signed to a long-term deal, too). You can’t go wrong with a few choices here, but Faber seems like he’d get the nod.
Which prospect not named Zeev Buium are you most excited about?
4,750 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Hunter Haight
0.8%
Riley Heidt
3.2%
David Jiricek
7.8%
Liam Ohgren
9.1%
Charlie Stramel
1.5%
Jesper Wallstedt
6.1%
Danila Yurov
71.4%
This one was Yurov in a landslide. The Wild are really high on their top forward prospect, someone who is a proven winner and can play the middle of the ice.
There’s also a little mystique and curiosity surrounding the Russian, especially with not a lot of fans getting to see him play — yet.
While Guerin acknowledged that there will probably be “growing pains” for Yurov as he transitions to the North American life and game, as well as defensive responsibilities at center, there’s a lot to be excited about.
How many points will Yurov score this year?
4,742 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Less than 20
7.5%
20 to 30
31.4%
30 to 40
40.5%
40 to 50
17.7%
More than 50
2.9%
Fans seem to have some reasonable expectations for Yurov, with a good chunk of you believing the rookie will score between 20 and 40 points.
Not everyone is like Boldy, who racked up at least 60 points in each of his first three full seasons. A lot of Yurov’s production will depend on how comfortable he becomes in the NHL, and how soon.
There’s also the question of what kind of role Yurov will have. Assuming Rossi re-signs, would that mean Yurov is slotted on a third line with Marcus Foligno and Ryan Hartman? How much power-play time will Yurov get?
What will Buium become?
4,751 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
No. 1 stud defenseman
45.1%
Steady top-four guy
53.1%
Bottom-pair defenseman
1.5%
Bust
0.4%
We’re writing this at the World Junior Summer Showcase, and lo and behold, Craig Button just came up to us and started raving — unsolicited — about Buium, in the context of how many pieces are missing from a U.S. World Juniors roster coming off back-to-back gold medals.
Button thinks Buium is the next Scott Niedermayer, and if that’s true, boy oh boy did Judd Brackett get himself a first-round steal in 2024.
There’s a reason the Wild traded up with the Philadelphia Flyers to draft Buium and declined multiple chances to trade the pick to the Winnipeg Jets for Rutger McGroarty.
We’ll get our first real look at him this year after his playoff taste in the spring. He’s got a good chance to start on the No. 1 power-play unit and get initial top-four minutes with Jonas Brodin expected to miss the start of the season due to offseason upper-body surgery.
Do you agree with the 2021 decision to buy out Suter and Parise?
4,746 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Yes to both
69.7%
Yes to Suter
13.2%
Yes to Parise
11.6%
No to both
5.5%
This might be getting old as a question but it was worth revisiting, especially now that the Wild are out from under most of Parise and Suter’s dead cap hits.
Most agree with the decision, and it’s hard to argue overall with eight playoff appearances in 10 seasons, but how this will really be judged is by what the Wild can do in the near future, both in adding to their roster and advancing in the postseason. There are some strong core players here, and there should be a handful of young players getting a chance to make their impact on the roster this season.
Guerin is entering his seventh season as Wild GM. How would you rate his performance?
4,753 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Excellent
5.7%
More hits than misses
61.0%
More misses than hits
25.9%
Disappointing
7.4%
We tweaked the options in this question from last year’s survey, but the results are about the same. A year ago, 65.1 percent of readers felt Guerin was doing an excellent job or were satisfied with the job he was doing.
This year, the top two answers combine for 66.7 percent.
The hits, of course, have been the Kevin Fiala trade that brought Faber and a first-round pick (Liam Ohgren), the Boldy and Eriksson Ek contracts and the acquisitions of Gustavsson and Jake Middleton.
Misses? As of now, the Yakov Trenin signing and the lack of impactful free-agent pickups, the additions of John Klingberg and Gustav Nyquist (the second time) with both players committing fatal mistakes that killed the Wild in the past two postseasons, and the mere fact that the Wild haven’t advanced past the first round in his six seasons.
It’s too early to judge the David Jiricek pickup, but Guerin sure gave up a haul.
While the pressure is mounting and, as usual, fans are loudest on social media, the majority here continue to be satisfied.
With 1 being the least confident and 5 being the most, how confident are you in Guerin as GM?
4,759 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
1
4.9%
2
13.3%
3
33.1%
4
39.8%
5
8.8%
There still seems to be cautious confidence in Guerin, with more than 80 percent of you in the 3 to 5 range. There have been some hits, as we mentioned above, and Guerin was dealing with the dead cap hits for several seasons.
But the next couple of years will ultimately be how Guerin is judged, starting with solving the Kaprizov extension and the Rossi saga.
How do the Wild’s touted prospects look this year (Yurov, Buium, Jiricek, Ohgren, Wallstedt)? Guerin has said the Wild have never been “serious contenders,” and how he navigates the roster (and his surge in cap space) coming up will be significant in whether he rewards the fans’ faith.
What must happen for you to consider 2025-26 successful, knowing it’s the Wild’s first season without serious cap limitations?
4,754 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Make the playoffs
5.1%
Win a round
76.0%
Go on a deep run
18.5%
Win Stanley Cup
0.4%
You can tell the patience is running pretty thin here, with 76 percent of fans polled saying a successful year will be at least winning a playoff round. Considering it’s been a decade since the Wild have completed that feat, there’s deservedly some pressure.
Making the playoffs is not enough. The fans understand that this is not necessarily a Stanley Cup-winning roster, but it is more than capable of advancing past Round 1. For this place to be a true destination in free agency, or via trade, the Wild have to show progress in the most important category for a lot of players: winning.
The legislature rejected the Wild and the city of St. Paul’s request for state funding for Grand Casino Arena renovations. What do you think is a fair compromise?
4,728 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Leipold picks up the full tab
19.8%
The city increases its contribution
32.8%
The state steps up and helps
34.2%
No renovations needed
6.2%
Move to Minneapolis
7.1%
The Wild and the city of St. Paul amended their recent asks from the state in their pursuit of public money to give the newly named Grand Casino Arena what they say is its first major renovation in 25 years.
But the state rejected the request outright. The amended submitted request was for the arena only — not all the bells and whistles in the surrounding area. Leipold and the city were willing to contribute $200 million each, and they were asking the state for $50 million.
Now the two sides can do nothing but wait until the next legislative session in January and try again.
The Wild use the building 44 times out of 365 days a hockey season, and with Leipold willing to contribute almost half of what is felt is needed to renovate the arena, the majority of fans who voted feel that’s appropriate and that the city and/or state need to step up.
From Day 1 of training camp to the last day of the season, who will intake more caffeine between Russo’s coffee and Smith’s Diet Cokes? (We’ll keep track)
4,678 responses
ResponsePercent of vote
Russo
80.5%
Smith
19.5%
You know your beat writers well.
Here’s the deal, though: Joe will undoubtedly lap Russo in the number of drinks consumed. Nobody drinks more Diet Coke in the world. You should see the cups during a game, and that’s after a day’s worth of Diet Coke.
He’s a member of the Panera “Sip Club” and carries around plastic cups from every restaurant in town so he has the ability to refill at a moment’s notice.
Heck, look at this sheepish grin as he sips on a Diet Coke as we write this thing.
Russo likely wins, though, because of the way this question was framed. In a Venti Americano, of which Russo drinks two to three per day, there’s 300 milligrams of caffeine compared to 46 milligrams in a 12-ounce can of Diet Coke.
So we’ll keep track of both: Numbers of coffee versus Diet Cokes AND amount of caffeine each guzzle. Wish our hearts and brains well this hockey season. Good thing they don’t count calories.
(Top photo of Kirill Kaprizov: Justin Berl / Getty Images)