Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
Fargione, J. E. et al. Natural climate solutions for the United States. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1869 (2018).
Rockström, J. et al. We need biosphere stewardship that protects carbon sinks and builds resilience. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2115218118 (2021).
Mo, L. et al. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature 624, 92–101 (2023).
Nölte, A., Yousefpour, R., Cifuentes-Jara, M. & Hanewinkel, M. Sharp decline in future productivity of tropical reforestation above 29 °C mean annual temperature. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg9175 (2023).
Walker, W. S. et al. The global potential for increased storage of carbon on land. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2111312119 (2022).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Towards more effective nature-based climate solutions in global forests. Nature 643, 1214–1222 (2025).
Badgley, G. Increasingly active wildfire seasons threaten the sustainability of forest-backed carbon offset programs. Glob. Chang. Biol. 30, e17599 (2024).
Pan, Y. et al. The enduring world forest carbon sink. Nature 631, 563–569 (2024).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023).
Riley, K. L. et al. Will landscape fire increase in the future? A systems approach to climate, fire, fuel, and human drivers. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 5, 9–24 (2019).
Ellis, P. W. et al. The principles of natural climate solutions. Nat. Commun. 15, 547 (2024).
Wu, C. et al. Uncertainty in US forest carbon storage potential due to climate risks. Nat. Geosci. 16, 422–429 (2023).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. A climate risk analysis of Earth’s forests in the 21st century. Science 377, 1099–1103 (2022).
Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 395–402 (2017).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Future climate risks from stress, insects and fire across US forests. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1510–1520 (2022).
Wang, J. A. et al. Rising forest exposure and fire severity from climate warming amplify tree cover losses from wildfire in California. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 114087 (2024).
Patacca, M. et al. Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 1359–1376 (2023).
Hlásny, T. et al. Bark beetle outbreaks in Europe: state of knowledge and ways forward for management. Curr. For. Rep. 7, 138–165 (2021).
Juang, C. S. et al. Rapid growth of large forest fires drives the exponential response of annual forest-fire area to aridity in the western United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2021GL097131 (2022).
Williams, A. P. et al. Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).
Anderson, C. M., Field, C. B. & Mach, K. J. Forest offsets partner climate-change mitigation with conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 359–365 (2017).
California Air Resources Board. Compliance Offset Program. California Air Resources Board https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/offsets/offsets.htm (2023).
California Air Resources Board. Summary of Transfers Registered in CITSS By California and Québec Entities During Fourth Quarter of 2023 (California Air Resources Board, 2023).
California Air Resources Board. Compliance Offset Protocol U.S. Forest Projects (California Air Resources Board, 2015).
Badgley, G. et al. California’s forest carbon offsets buffer pool is severely undercapitalized. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 5, 930426 (2022).
Haya, B. K. et al. Comprehensive review of carbon quantification by improved forest management offset protocols. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 6, 958879 (2023).
Anderegg, W. R. L., Trugman, A. T., Vargas G, G., Wu, C. & Yang, L. Current forest carbon offset buffer pool contributions do not adequately insure against disturbance-driven carbon losses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 31, e70251 (2025).
Cleland, D. T. et al. Ecological Subregions: Sections and Subsections for the Conterminous United States. General Technical Report WO-76D (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2007).
Migliavacca, M. et al. Securing the forest carbon sink for the European Union’s climate ambition. Nature 643, 1203–1213 (2025).
Yocom Kent, L. L. et al. Interactions of fuel treatments, wildfire severity, and carbon dynamics in dry conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 349, 66–72 (2015).
Romme, W. H. et al. Historical and modern disturbance regimes, stand structures, and landscape dynamics in piñon–juniper vegetation of the western United States. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 62, 203–222 (2009).
Buma, B., Weiss, S., Hayes, K. & Lucash, M. Wildland fire reburning trends across the US West suggest only short-term negative feedback and differing climatic effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034026 (2020).
Coppoletta, M., Merriam, K. E. & Collins, B. M. Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns. Ecol. Appl. 26, 686–699 (2016).
Pellegrini, A. F. A. et al. Fire effects on the persistence of soil organic matter and long-term carbon storage. Nat. Geosci. 15, 5–13 (2022).
Hasler, N. et al. Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration. Nat. Commun. 15, 2275 (2024).
Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Robinson, N. et al. Protect young secondary forests for optimum carbon removal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 15, 793–800 (2025).
Neary, D. G., Klopatek, C. C., DeBano, L. F. & Ffolliott, P. F. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. For. Ecol. Manage. 122, 51–71 (1999).
Pellegrini, A. F. A. et al. Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity. Nature 553, 194–198 (2018).
Bossio, D. A. et al. The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nat. Sustain. 3, 391–398 (2020).
Climate Analytics & NewClimate Institute. Emissions Pathways to 2100: Emissions and expected warming based on pledges and current policies. Climate Action Tracker https://climateactiontracker.org/global/temperatures (2023).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).
Gillespie, A. J. R. Rationale for a national annual forest inventory program. J. For. 97, 16–20 (1999).
Balderas Torres, A. & Lovett, J. C. Using basal area to estimate aboveground carbon stocks in forests: La Primavera biosphere’s reserve, Mexico. Forestry 86, 267–281 (2013).
Chiba, Y. Architectural analysis of relationship between biomass and basal area based on pipe model theory. Ecol. Model. 108, 219–225 (1998).
Shaw, J. D., Steed, B. E. & DeBlander, L. T. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) annual inventory answers the question: what is happening to Pinyon-juniper woodlands? J. For. 103, 280–285 (2005).
Bell, D. M., Bradford, J. B. & Lauenroth, W. K. Forest stand structure, productivity, and age mediate climatic effects on aspen decline. Ecology 95, 2040–2046 (2014).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytol. 208, 674–683 (2015).
Hember, R. A., Kurz, W. A. & Coops, N. C. Relationships between individual-tree mortality and water-balance variables indicate positive trends in water stress-induced tree mortality across North America. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 1691–1710 (2017).
McNellis, B. E., Smith, A. M. S., Hudak, A. T. & Strand, E. K. Tree mortality in western U.S. forests forecasted using forest inventory and Random Forest classification. Ecosphere 12, e03419 (2021).
Venturas, M. D., Todd, H. N., Trugman, A. T. & Anderegg, W. R. L. Understanding and predicting forest mortality in the western United States using long-term forest inventory data and modeled hydraulic damage. New Phytol. 230, 1896–1910 (2021).
Abatzoglou, J. T., Juang, C. S., Williams, A. P., Kolden, C. A. & Westerling, A. L. Increasing synchronous fire danger in forests of the western United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091377 (2021).
Brown, P. T. et al. Climate warming increases extreme daily wildfire growth risk in California. Nature 621, 760–766 (2023).
Cook, B. I. et al. Twenty-first century drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Earths Future 8, e2019EF001461 (2020).
Williams, A. P. et al. Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earths Future 7, 892–910 (2019).
Brogli, R., Heim, C., Mensch, J., Sørland, S. L. & Schär, C. The pseudo-global-warming (PGW) approach: methodology, software package PGW4ERA5 v1.1, validation, and sensitivity analyses. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 907–926 (2023).
Delfino, R. J., Vidale, P. L., Bagtasa, G. & Hodges, K. Response of damaging Philippines tropical cyclones to a warming climate using the pseudo global warming approach. Clim. Dyn. 61, 3499–3523 (2023).
Kimura, F. & Kitoh, A. Downscaling by Pseudo Global Warming Method. The Final Report of ICCAP, Vol. 4346, 463–478 (ICCAP, 2007).
Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).
Li, F. et al. Evaluation of global fire simulations in CMIP6 Earth system models. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. 17, 8751–8771 (2024).
Hantson, S. et al. Quantitative assessment of fire and vegetation properties in simulations with fire-enabled vegetation models from the Fire Model Intercomparison Project. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3299–3318 (2020).
Hooper, S. & Kennedy, R. E. A spatial ensemble approach for broad-area mapping of land surface properties. Remote Sens. Environ. 210, 473–489 (2018).
Santoro, M. & Cartus, O. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): Global Datasets of Forest Above-ground Biomass for the Years 2010, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020, v4 (NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, 2023).
Santoro, M. et al. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 3927–3950 (2021).
Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017).
Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).
Di Virgilio, G. et al. Climate change increases the potential for extreme wildfires. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 8517–8526 (2019).
Wasserman, T. N. & Mueller, S. E. Climate influences on future fire severity: a synthesis of climate-fire interactions and impacts on fire regimes, high-severity fire, and forests in the western United States. Fire Ecol. 19, 43 (2023).
Badgley, G. et al. Systematic over-crediting in California’s forest carbon offsets program. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 1433–1445 (2022).
Bar-On, Y. M. et al. Recent gains in global terrestrial carbon stocks are mostly stored in nonliving pools. Science 387, 1291–1295 (2025).
Oberle, B., Ogle, K., Zanne, A. E. & Woodall, C. W. When a tree falls: controls on wood decay predict standing dead tree fall and new risks in changing forests. PLoS One 13, e0196712 (2018).
Cluck, D. R. & Smith, S. L. Fall Rates of Snags: A Summary of the literature for California conifer species. NE-SPR-07-01 (US Department of Agriculture, 2007).
Birch, J. D. et al. Heading and backing fire behaviours mediate the influence of fuels on wildfire energy. Int. J. Wildland Fire 32, 1244–1261 (2023).
Campbell, J., Donato, D., Azuma, D. & Law, B. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 112, G04014 (2007).
Meigs, G. W., Donato, D. C., Campbell, J. L., Martin, J. G. & Law, B. E. Forest fire impacts on carbon uptake, storage, and emission: the role of burn severity in the eastern cascades, Oregon. Ecosystems 12, 1246–1267 (2009).
Donato, D. C., Fontaine, J. B., Kauffman, J. B., Robinson, W. D. & Law, B. E. Fuel mass and forest structure following stand-replacement fire and post-fire logging in a mixed-evergreen forest. Int. J. Wildland Fire 22, 652–666 (2013).
Miesel, J., Reiner, A., Ewell, C., Maestrini, B. & Dickinson, M. Quantifying changes in total and pyrogenic carbon stocks across fire severity gradients using active wildfire incidents. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 41 (2018).
Poorter, H. et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193, 30–50 (2012).
Davis, K. T. et al. Wildfires and climate change push low-elevation forests across a critical climate threshold for tree regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6193–6198 (2019).
Wilson, B. T., Woodall, C. W. & Griffith, D. M. Imputing forest carbon stock estimates from inventory plots to a nationally continuous coverage. Carbon Balance Manag. 8, 1 (2013).
Chegwidden, O. S. et al. Climate risks to carbon sequestration in US forests (1.0). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4741333 (2021).