Recent concerns over quantum computing’s potential to crack Bitcoin’s cryptographic security have been challenged by Graham Cooke, a former Google executive and CEO of Brava Labs. Cooke asserts that Bitcoin’s current cryptographic framework, particularly the 24-word seed phrase, remains secure against quantum threats due to the mathematical infeasibility of brute-force attacks [1].
The seed phrase, used to derive a wallet’s private keys, offers an astronomically high number of possible combinations. According to Cooke, even if every person on Earth operated a billion supercomputers, each capable of testing a billion combinations per second, it would still take over 10⁴⁰ years to crack a single seed phrase — an amount of time far exceeding the age of the universe [2]. This highlights the immense complexity and resilience of Bitcoin’s cryptographic design.
Although major tech firms like Microsoft, Google, and IBM continue to make strides in quantum computing, Cooke underscores that significant technical barriers remain. Qubits, the foundational units of quantum computation, are inherently unstable and prone to decoherence. While innovations such as Microsoft’s Majorana 1 chip aim to stabilize qubits using topological conductors, Cooke compares the challenge to maintaining the shape of a knot in a rubber band — theoretically feasible, but not practically viable for breaking Bitcoin’s encryption [2].
Cooke also points to ongoing projects like Google’s Willow and IBM’s Blue Jay, which reflect the industry’s push toward quantum supremacy. However, he argues that these developments have yet to bridge the technological gap necessary to pose a real threat to Bitcoin’s security [2]. He emphasizes that quantum computing still requires substantial progress in energy efficiency, qubit stability, and algorithmic design before it could conceivably impact cryptographic systems.
Industry perspectives largely align with Cooke’s view, noting that while post-quantum cryptographic algorithms may be necessary in the future, there is currently no imminent risk to Bitcoin users. The seed phrase’s mathematical complexity continues to provide a robust defense against all known computing systems [2].
As discussions around quantum threats persist, Cooke’s analysis offers a grounded and mathematically supported reassurance that Bitcoin’s cryptographic integrity remains intact. The debate, for now, remains theoretical rather than a pressing concern for users [1].
Sources:
[1] Google Veteran Says Quantum Computing Can’t Crack Bitcoin – BeInCrypto
https://beincrypto.com/google-veteran-says-quantum-computing-cant-crack-bitcoin/
[2] Quantum Computing Surge Rekindles Fears of Bitcoin Hacking – IcoHolder
https://icoholder.com/en/news/quantum-computing-surge-rekindles-fears-of-bitcoin-hacking