California lawmakers block Newsom’s push to prevent insurance companies from suing utilities that cause wildfires
California lawmakers have blocked Gov. Gavin Newsom from pursuing his plan to prevent insurance companies in California from recouping their losses from investor-owned utilities that cause a catastrophic wildfire, multiple sources close to the negotiations confirmed to KCRA 3 on Friday morning.
Four sources who spoke on the condition they remain anonymous, said the negotiations broke down late Thursday night during a closed-door meeting between the governor’s staff and Democratic state lawmakers who are part of a working group on wildfire liability.
The push to shift some of those wildfire liability costs onto insurers was part of a broader plan the governor has been pushing to limit who and how much the state’s three investor-owned utilities pay when they cause a catastrophic wildfire. The governor wanted to end what’s known as subrogation, a process in which insurance companies recoup losses from utilities after the companies pay wildfire claims for damaged or destroyed property.
The CEOs of major insurance companies warned this would cause premiums to skyrocket and risked destabilizing the state’s insurance market again.
The governor has been pushing this plan with fears that a future wildfire caused by an investor-owned utility could drain the state’s wildfire liability fund that is funded by ratepayers and shareholders and risk bankruptcy for the investor-owned utility companies.
Facing frustration from some lawmakers and the insurance industry, the governor’s office attempted to pare down the proposal late Thursday afternoon by offering to end subrogation in phases instead of eliminating it immediately. The plan still did not sit well with the Democrats in the State Senate, according to the sources.
The high-stakes meeting happened as lawmakers and the governor faced a deadline Friday to put any wildfire liability changes into a bill. California’s legislative session ends Monday, Aug. 31 at midnight.
In an email obtained by KCRA 3, the governor’s office staff acknowledged Thursday night there was not a “path to take on the larger structural reform in a way to meaningfully contain costs.”
The email noted the governor’s office would still propose to ban utility CEOs from receiving bonuses if their company starts a wildfire, create a fast-pay program to speed up victim payouts, establish a statewide community wildfire strategy, create a wildfire data sharing platform, and outlaw speculative investing in wildfire claims by hedge funds and private equity.
“All other outstanding issues are off the table,” the email read.
Right after this story was first published at around 9:30 this morning, PG&E’s stock dropped nearly 10%, while Southern California Edison’s dropped by about 5%. SDG&E’s dipped by about 1%.
On Friday afternoon, wildfire survivors praised the State Senate and Assembly for blocking parts of the governor’s wildfire liability plan that would have limited how much wildfire victims could recover.
“We are profoundly grateful to the legislators who stood up for the real fire survivors,” said Joy Chen, Executive Director of Every Fire Survivor’s Network. “They have rejected nearly all of the Governor’s original bailout terms, including his attacks on survivors’ rights to recover economic and noneconomic damages and his devastating proposal to deny recovery to smoke-damage survivors outside an artificial fire-perimeter line. Preserving these rights is an enormous victory for all Californians.”
A spokesperson for the governor said Friday afternoon that negotiations were ongoing. The governor’s office said it sent an offer to the California Legislature “addressing” subrogation concerns. KCRA 3 has yet to obtain details of that offer.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
See more coverage of top California stories here | Download our app | Subscribe to our morning newsletter | Find us on YouTube here and subscribe to our channel | Make KCRA a preferred news source in Google