Climate can shape where you want to retire, but state-by-state costs may reshape what feels affordable.
Credit: Getty Images Key Takeaways
Florida requires an estimated $1.1 million nest egg after average Social Security benefits for a typical retired couple, according to an Investopedia analysis.
These lower-cost states include coastal, mountain-adjacent, and inland options for retirees seeking generally mild winters.
Some popular warm-weather states were excluded because their cost advantage over Florida was narrow or nonexistent.
For many retirees, Florida has long been shorthand for a certain kind of retirement: sunny days, warm winters, beach towns, and no snow to shovel. But choosing where to retire is rarely just about the weather.
It’s also about how far your savings will stretch, what kind of community you want, and whether the most popular location choices fit the next chapter you aim to build. For retirees who want balmy weather but aren’t sure Florida is the right fit, Investopedia analyzed retirement costs after Social Security in all 50 states to identify alternatives that require a smaller nest egg.
Florida May Be the Classic Retirement Pick—But It’s Not Cheap
In our analysis, Florida requires an estimated $1,102,796 in savings for a comfortable retirement for a typical couple after average Social Security benefits are factored in. For a single retiree, the required nest egg is $858,197.
That puts the Sunshine State in the upper tier nationally. For couples, Florida had the 14th-highest required nest egg among the 50 states and Washington, D.C., coming in below high-cost states such as New Jersey, Hawaii, California, and New York, but above many other states in the South and Southwest.
For retirees comparing warmer-weather options, Florida’s number creates a useful benchmark. The states highlighted below all came in lower in Investopedia’s analysis, offering a starting point for retirees who want to weigh climate and cost together.
Why This Matters
Friendly year-round temps can make a state appealing in retirement—but it doesn’t guarantee affordability. Looking beyond the obvious choices can help you find places where your savings may go further.
9 Warm-Weather States Where You Can Retiree With a Smaller Nest Egg
For a typical retired couple, the nine states below require less savings than Florida according to Investopedia’s analysis. The states are ranked by the estimated nest egg required to enjoy a comfortable retirement after factoring in the average Social Security benefit for a couple, which was $3,143 per month in 2024.
State
Estimated Nest Egg Required for a Typical Couple
Savings Compared to Florida
Arkansas
$806,521
$296,275
Mississippi
$813,238
$289,558
Louisiana
$836,929
$265,867
Tennessee
$857,377
$245,419
Alabama
$861,786
$241,010
New Mexico
$895,491
$207,305
$920,852
$181,944
$938,869
$163,927
Georgia
$969,482
$133,314
As you can see, the estimated savings compared to Florida range from about $130,000 in neighboring Georgia to almost $300,000 in Arkansas. Even within this narrow group of warm-weather alternatives, the potential savings vary enough to make location a meaningful part of retirement budgeting.
The options also vary in the type of retirement lifestyle they might support. Some offer coastal or Gulf Coast settings, while others are better known for inland cities, towns with easy mountain access, or generally milder winters than much of the country.
Retiring on Your Own?
While this analysis focuses on the estimated nest egg required for a typical retired couple, single retirees can compare costs in our state-by-state guide to the savings required for a solo retirement.
Why Texas, Arizona, and California Didn’t Make the Cut
Some of the country’s best-known warm-weather retirement destinations missed the main list because they either require a larger nest egg than Florida or offer a narrower cost advantage than the states featured above.
Texas requires less savings than Florida, with an estimated nest egg of about $988,000. But in a sprawling state that spans multiple major metros, smaller cities, Gulf Coast communities, and rural areas, statewide averages may be less useful than comparing specific places.
Like Florida, Arizona is another perennial retirement favorite—and it does require a smaller nest egg according to Investopedia’s analysis. But its cost advantage is much narrower than the states highlighted above, requiring an estimated $1.04 million—only about $64,000 less than Florida.
California, on the other hand, is among the most expensive states in our analysis, behind only New Jersey and Hawaii. It requires an estimated $1.32 million for a typical retired couple after average Social Security benefits are factored in.
Read the original article on Investopedia