The COROS NOMAD has impressed me as a more fun Garmin Instinct 3 rival

COROS has launched a new outdoor fitness watch for hikers and campers with dual-band GPS, 22-day battery life, and offline maps. Having tested the COROS NOMAD out myself, I can happily say that it’s an intriguing alternative to the popular Garmin Instinct 3, and better in several ways.

The NOMAD’s key perk is its offline street and topographic maps, now improved with street/ trail names and points of interest in case you don’t predownload a course.

Its Ambiq Apollo 510 processor makes map navigation blissfully smooth. Scroll in or out with the crown, or swipe on the touch display to look nearby, and it fills in the details in less than a second, where other fitness watches I’ve tested have painfully laggy maps.

You may like

(Image credit: Michael Hicks / Android Central)

Old-school fitness watch fans will appreciate that the COROS NOMAD uses a 1.3-inch MIP display. I’m much more of an AMOLED fan, but COROS’s colorful, high-contrast take on MIP is respectably readable indoors, once you turn on the gesture backlight, and it’s great outdoors.

In many ways, the NOMAD is a rugged COROS PACE Pro. Both share the same $349 price tag, 30+ hours of dual-band GPS tracking, training load data, recovery time recommendations, music storage, and speedy offline map navigation.

But while the PACE Pro has to compete against a crowded market of running watches, the NOMAD has only a few rugged adventurer rivals like the Instinct 3 and Amazfit T-Rex 3.

Why the COROS NOMAD excited me more than the Garmin Instinct 3

I gave the Garmin Instinct 3 a solid review score for its weeks of battery life, accurate data, and Garmin training tools. But I also complained that Garmin should have given a $450+ “adventurer’s watch” offline maps and more exclusive outdoor tools, so that battery life wasn’t its only trademark.

Whether you care about the NOMAD’s voice pins and fishing tools or not, at least COROS made sure to differentiate it from its other lineups, and didn’t price-lock maps like Garmin does. Plus, even if you buy the Fenix 8 for mapping, it has more sluggish performance, and navigating with buttons instead of a crown isn’t that fun.

Of course, the Instinct 3 has plenty of upsides over the NOMAD: doubled water depth with a MIL-STD-810 rating, a built-in flashlight, daily suggested workouts, a rucking app, and contactless payments. Most importantly, Garmin offers AMOLED or solar recharging in multiple sizes, where the NOMAD only comes in one MIP variant.

So it’s not to say that the COROS NOMAD is “better” than the Instinct 3. But it’s $100–150 cheaper, it’s a more dependable navigation aid in emergencies, it helps you preserve memories of your favorite outdoor moments, and its weeks of battery life will be enough for most without solar recharging.

Testing the COROS NOMAD’s GPS and HR accuracy

I took the COROS NOMAD out for a long run and a hike while wearing the Garmin Forerunner 970 and the Garmin HRM 200 chest strap as control groups for GPS and HR, respectively.

For the first 12-mile run, I used the NOMAD’s default All-Systems GNSS mode and SatIQ mode on the Forerunner 970. COROS and Garmin ended up differing by about 50m / 0.03 miles by the end, a pretty minor discrepancy. You can see in the maps above how the NOMAD (red) sometimes drifts off course into cars or houses, but otherwise stays on the street or trail with reliable accuracy.

Image 1 of 5

(Image credit: Android Central)(Image credit: Android Central)(Image credit: Android Central)(Image credit: Android Central)(Image credit: Android Central)

For my hike, I used dual-band GPS on both watches. Again, the gap was 0.03 miles or 50m, with the NOMAD (orange) and Forerunner (red) mostly staying in lockstep on tricky, winding trails and barely struggling with tree foliage.

The only blip was how COROS randomly warped me at the end of the hike about a mile, adding a ton of excess elevation. I have no idea how it happened, and haven’t replicated the glitch since, but at least it didn’t seem to affect my distance data.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Android Central)(Image credit: Android Central)

As for heart rate, the COROS NOMAD matched my chest strap’s HR average and max for the hike, but fell 1 bpm and 2 bpm short for average and max during that hard 12-mile run, respectively. Most optical wrist-based sensors struggle with anaerobic heart rates, but COROS’s gap is smaller than most brands; serious runners may insist on wearing a chest strap, but everyone else should be satisfied.

Overall, I think COROS NOMAD buyers should be quite happy with its accuracy. It launches today, August 18, on COROS’s website, and should come to retailers like Amazon and REI later in the month.