As A’ja Wilson dominated on the court and the WNBA Finals captivated fans, another battle is brewing off it, one that could define the league’s future. The WNBA and its players are still at odds over a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA), and with the Oct. 31 deadline fast approaching, tension is running high. A new proposal from the league has emerged, but it’s raising almost as many questions as it answers.
What’s the Latest CBA Proposal and How Does It Impact Players Salaries?
According to Front Office Sports, the WNBA’s latest proposal includes a massive bump to player pay. The league’s new plan would raise the supermax salary to around $850,000, more than triple the current figure of $249,244. The veteran minimum would also increase significantly, jumping to about $300,000 from just $78,831.
On paper, that sounds like a significant win for players. But it still falls short of what many stars have been pushing for: a supermax starting at or above $1 million in the first year of the new deal.
The WNBA Players Association opted out of the current CBA the day after the 2024 Finals, setting up this high-stakes showdown.
Negotiations have been heated for months, with the league and players reportedly meeting multiple times. The most prominent sit-down came during the All-Star break, when the WNBA players famously wore “Pay Us What You Owe Us” shirts to make their point.
Caitlin Clark, perhaps the biggest name in the game right now, sits right at the center of this conversation. Her current rookie deal with the Indiana Fever — four years, $338,056, averaging just $84,514 annually– looks tiny compared with her market impact. Clark will make only $78,066 next season, even as her games routinely sell out arenas and draw record-breaking TV audiences.
That’s why tripling the top salary and more than tripling the veteran minimum might sound like progress, but for the players, it might still not be enough to match how fast the league’s business is growing.
Thanks mainly to what’s been dubbed the “Caitlin Clark effect,” the WNBA has exploded in popularity. Ratings have shattered previous records, merchandise is flying off the shelves, and attendance has surged across the league. The upcoming television deal is reportedly worth around $200 million annually, more than triple what the league currently earns.
And that’s not all. The analysts at Deloitte project the league’s total revenue will surpass $1 billion in 2025.
With that kind of growth, the proposed salary increases, while historic on paper, don’t truly reflect the money flowing into the league. That’s why the players are also pushing for a more player-friendly revenue-sharing model: one that would allow them to benefit directly as the WNBA’s financial success keeps climbing.
As the Oct. 31 deadline looms, the pressure is mounting. Without a new deal, the WNBA faces the real possibility of a work stoppage, a nightmare scenario for a league finally basking in mainstream attention.
So while fans watched Wilson torch defenses and help steer the Las Vegas Aces to their third championship in four seasons, the most critical moves right now might be happening behind closed doors. The next few weeks could determine not just who gets paid, but what the future of women’s basketball looks like.