Stephens, G. L. et al. The albedo of Earth. Rev. Geophys. 53, 141–163 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Vonder Haar, T. H. & Suomi, V. E. Measurements of the earth’s radiation budget from satellites during a five-year period. Part I: extended time and space means. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 305–314 (1971).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ramanathan, V. The role of earth radiation budget studies in climate and general circulation research. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 92, 4075–4095 (1987).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Stevens, B. & Schwartz, S. E. Observing and modeling Earth’s energy flows. Surv. Geophys. 33, 779–816 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bender, F. A.-M., Engström, A., Wood, R. & Charlson, R. J. Evaluation of hemispheric asymmetries in marine cloud radiative properties. J. Clim. 30, 4131–4147 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Diamond, M. S., Gristey, J. J. & Feingold, G. Testing cloud adjustment hypotheses for the maintenance of Earth’s hemispheric albedo symmetry with natural experiments. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2024GL111733 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Voigt, A., Stevens, B., Bader, J. & Mauritsen, T. The observed hemispheric symmetry in reflected shortwave irradiance. J. Clim. 26, 468–477 (2013).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Datseris, G. & Stevens, B. Earth’s albedo and its symmetry. AGU Adv. 2, e2021AV000440 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jönsson, A. & Bender, F. A.-M. Persistence and variability of Earth’s interhemispheric albedo symmetry in 19 years of CERES EBAF observations. J. Clim. 35, 249–268 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Diamond, M. S., Gristey, J. J., Kay, J. E. & Feingold, G. Anthropogenic aerosol and cryosphere changes drive Earth’s strong but transient clear-sky hemispheric albedo asymmetry. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 206 (2022).

Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Loeb, N. G. et al. Emerging hemispheric asymmetry of Earth’s radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2511595122 (2025).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Oreopoulos, L., Cho, N. & Lee, D. The role of Earth’s major cloud systems in the hemispheric albedo symmetry. J. Clim. 38, 7203–7215 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Singer, C. E. & Pincus, R. Southern Ocean clear-sky brightening from sea spray aerosol increase drives departure from hemispheric albedo symmetry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 53, e2025GL119637 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Wielicki, B. A. et al. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES): an Earth observing system experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 853–868 (1996).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Loeb, N. G. et al. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 data product. J. Clim. 31, 895–918 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kato, S. et al. Surface irradiances of Edition 4.0 Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) data product. J. Clim. 31, 4501–4527 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Sun, M. et al. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) FluxByCldTyp Edition 4 data product. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 39, 303–318 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Klein, S. A. & Hartmann, D. L. The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Clim. 6, 1587–1606 (1993).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Donohoe, A. & Battisti, D. S. Atmospheric and surface contributions to planetary albedo. J. Clim. 24, 4402–4418 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cesana, G. V. et al. The correlation between Arctic sea ice, cloud phase and radiation using A-Train satellites. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 7899–7909 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Cavalieri, D. J. & Parkinson, C. L. Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010. Cryosphere 6, 881–889 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Eayrs, C., Li, X., Raphael, M. N. & Holland, D. M. Rapid decline in Antarctic sea ice in recent years hints at future change. Nat. Geosci. 14, 460–464 (2021).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Davies, T. W. & Smyth, T. Darkening of the global ocean. Glob Change Biol. 31, e70227 (2025).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Tselioudis, G., Remillard, J., Jakob, C. & Rossow, W. B. Contraction of the world’s storm-cloud zones the primary contributor to the 21st century increase in the Earth’s sunlight absorption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2025GL114882 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Eyring, V. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1937–1958 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kravitz, B. et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3379–3392 (2015).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

McGraw, Z. & Polvani, L. M. Direct radiative impacts of stratospheric aerosols on the tropical troposphere: clouds, precipitation, and circulation in convection-resolving and global simulations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06163 (2025).

Gristey, J. J. & Feingold, G. Stratospheric aerosol injection would change cloud brightness. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2024GL113914 (2025).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Bjerknes, J. Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific. Mon. Weather Rev. 97, 163–172 (1969).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Dagan, G., Yeheskel, N. & Williams, A. I. L. Radiative forcing from aerosol-cloud interactions enhanced by large-scale circulation adjustments. Nat. Geosci. 16, 1092–1098 (2023).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

McCulloch, D., Webb, M. J., Lambert, F. H. & Vallis, G. K. Weakening tropical deep convection reduces subtropical low clouds via lower free-tropospheric moisture convergence in a climate model. Preprint at https://www.authorea.com/doi/full/10.22541/au.175407740.01003894 (2025).

Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19, 5686–5699 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Vecchi, G. A. & Soden, B. J. Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J. Clim. 20, 4316–4340 (2007).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Fasullo, J. T., Rosenbloom, N. & Buchholz, R. A multiyear tropical Pacific cooling response to recent Australian wildfires in CESM2. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg1213 (2023).

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Zhu, Y., Mann, G., Newman, P. A. & Randel, W. The Hunga volcanic eruption atmospheric impacts report. APARC IPO, APARC report 11, https://doi.org/10.34734/FZJ-2025-05237 (2025).

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance (The National Academies Press, 2021).

Feingold, G. et al. Physical science research needed to evaluate the viability and risks of marine cloud brightening. Sci. Adv. 10, eadi8594 (2024).

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Hill, S. & Ming, Y. Nonlinear climate response to regional brightening of tropical marine stratocumulus. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L15707 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Xing, C. Subtropical marine cloud brightening suppresses the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Earths Future 13, e2025EF006522 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Rasch, P. J., Latham, J. & Chen, C.-C. J. Geoengineering by cloud seeding: influence on sea ice and climate system. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045112 (2009).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bednarz, E. M., Haywood, J. M., Visioni, D., Butler, A. H. & Jones, A. How marine cloud brightening could also affect stratospheric ozone. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu4038 (2025).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Forster, P. et al. in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 923–1054 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

Loeb, N. G. et al. Satellite and ocean data reveal marked increase in Earth’s heating rate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL093047 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kramer, R. J. et al. Observational evidence of increasing global radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091585 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Loeb, N. G. et al. Observational assessment of changes in Earth’s energy imbalance since 2000. Surv. Geophys. 45, 1757–1783 (2024).

Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Mauritsen, T. et al. Earth’s energy imbalance more than doubled in recent decades. AGU Adv. 6, e2024AV001636 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Loeb, N. G. et al. Continuity in top-of-atmosphere Earth radiation budget observations. J. Clim. 37, 6093–6108 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

KISS Continuity Study Team. Toward a US framework for continuity of satellite observations of Earth’s climate and for supporting societal resilience. Earths Future 12, e2023EF003757 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC. CERES Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) TOA and Surface Monthly means data in netCDF Edition 4.2.1. https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA-AQUA-NOAA20/CERES/EBAF_L3B004.2.1 (2025).

NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC. CERES Monthly Daytime Mean Regionally Averaged Terra and Aqua TOA Fluxes and Associated Cloud Properties Stratified by Optical Depth and Effective Pressure Edition4A. https://doi.org/10.5067/Terra-Aqua/CERES/FLUXBYCLDTYP-MONTH_L3.004A (2020).

NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC. CERES and GEO-Enhanced TOA, Within-Atmosphere and Surface Fluxes, Clouds and Aerosols Monthly Terra-Aqua Edition4A. https://doi.org/10.5067/TERRA+AQUA/CERES/SYN1DEGMONTH_L3.004A (2017).

NOAA Climate Prediction Center. Oceanic Niño Index (ONI). https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/oni.ascii.txt (2026).

Rossow, W. B. & Schiffer, R. A. Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 2261–2287 (1999).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Doelling, D. R. et al. Geostationary enhanced temporal interpolation for CERES flux products. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 30, 1072–1090 (2013).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Gristey, J. J. et al. Insights into the diurnal cycle of global Earth outgoing radiation using a numerical weather prediction model. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 5129–5145 (2018).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Loeb, N. G. et al. Toward optimal closure of the Earth’s top-of-atmosphere radiation budget. J. Clim. 22, 748–766 (2009).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kuma, P., Bender, F. A. & Jönsson, A. R. Climate model code genealogy and its relation to climate feedbacks and sensitivity. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 15, e2022MS003588 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Krasting, J. P. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-ESM4 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.859 (2018).

Guo, H. et al. NOAA-GFDL GFDL-CM4 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.9242 (2018).

NASA Goddard Institute For Space Studies (NASA/GISS). NASA-GISS GISS-E2.1G model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7127 (2018).

NASA Goddard Institute For Space Studies (NASA/GISS). NASA-GISS GISS-E2.1G model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2074 (2020).

Boucher, O. et al. IPSL IPSL-CM5A2-INCA model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.13661 (2020).

Boucher, O. et al. IPSL IPSL-CM5A2-INCA model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.15667 (2020).

Boucher, O. et al. IPSL IPSL-CM6A-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 GeoMIP G6sulfur. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/esgf/cmip6.5059 (2020).

Tatebe, H. & Watanabe, M. MIROC MIROC6 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.5603 (2018).

Shiogama, H., Abe, M. & Tatebe, H. MIROC MIROC6 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.898 (2019).

Tang, Y. et al. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6113 (2019).

Good, P. et al. MOHC UKESM1.0-LL model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1567 (2019).

Swart, N. C. et al. CCCma CanESM5 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.3610 (2019).

Swart, N. C. et al. CCCma CanESM5 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.1317 (2019).

Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2 model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.7627 (2019).

Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2 model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2201 (2019).

Danabasoglu, G. NCAR CESM2-WACCM model output prepared for CMIP6 GeoMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.10025 (2019).

Wieners, K.-H. et al. MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 CMIP historical. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6595 (2019).

Wieners, K.-H. et al. MPI-M MPIESM1.2-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 ScenarioMIP. Earth System Grid Federation. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.793 (2019).

Niemeier, U. et al. MPI-M MPI-ESM1.2-LR model output prepared for CMIP6 GeoMIP G6sulfur. Earth System Grid. https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.6448 (2019).

Bretherton, C. S., Widmann, M., Dymnikov, V. P., Wallace, J. M. & Bladé, I. The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field. J. Clim. 12, 1990–2009 (1999).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Met Office. Cartopy: a cartographic Python library with a Matplotlib interface. https://cartopy.readthedocs.io (2010–2015).

Zhang, J. Analytical and plotting scripts for “Earth’s east–west albedo symmetry”. https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl9/datasets/data/2026-Zhang/ (2026).

Xu, R. et al. Contrasting impacts of forests on cloud cover based on satellite observations. Nat. Commun. 13, 670 (2022).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar
 

Leung, G. R., Grant, L. D. & van den Heever, S. C. Deforestation-driven increases in shallow clouds are greatest in drier, low-aerosol regions of Southeast Asia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL107678 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Dror, T. & Feingold, G. Amazon forest loss: an all-sky biophysical top-of-atmosphere cooling feedback. Science 392, 429–432 (2026).

Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Sévellec, F., Fedorov, A. V. & Liu, W. Arctic sea-ice decline weakens the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 604–610 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Liu, W., Fedorov, A. & Sévellec, F. The mechanisms of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation slowdown induced by Arctic sea ice decline. J. Clim. 32, 977–996 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Weijer, W. Interactions between the Arctic Mediterranean and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: a review. Oceanography 35, 118–127 (2022).


Google Scholar