{"id":103941,"date":"2025-08-23T09:39:11","date_gmt":"2025-08-23T09:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/103941\/"},"modified":"2025-08-23T09:39:11","modified_gmt":"2025-08-23T09:39:11","slug":"better-quantum-computing-stock-d-wave-quantum-or-rigetti-computing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/103941\/","title":{"rendered":"Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum or Rigetti Computing?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>                                    Key Points<\/p>\n<p data-pm-slice=\"1 1 []\" data-prosemirror-content-type=\"node\" data-prosemirror-node-block=\"true\" data-prosemirror-node-name=\"paragraph\">There&#8217;s a lot of buzz in the quantum computing investment realm, mainly driven by investors&#8217; willingness to take on more risk. As a result, people are also considering investing in high-risk, high-reward quantum computing pure plays like D-Wave Quantum <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasdaq.com\/market-activity\/stocks\/qbts\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">(NYSE: QBTS)<\/a> and Rigetti Computing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasdaq.com\/market-activity\/stocks\/rgti\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">(NASDAQ: RGTI)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p data-pm-slice=\"1 1 []\" data-prosemirror-content-type=\"node\" data-prosemirror-node-block=\"true\" data-prosemirror-node-name=\"paragraph\">These are two of the more popular pure-play quantum computing stock picks, but is one a better pick than the other?<\/p>\n<p>Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. <a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=262f18ee-223c-488d-acd2-1b43adbb50d8&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001096%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_veh%3Dtop_incontent_pitch_feed_partner%26ftm_pit%3D17547&amp;utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Continue \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"A quantum computing cell.\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/1755941951_840_\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"caption\">Image source: Getty Images.<\/p>\n<p>Quantum computing is still proving its relevance<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/terms\/q\/quantum-computing\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Quantum computing<\/a> could be a game-changing technology, similar to how <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/terms\/a\/artificial-intelligence\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">artificial intelligence (AI)<\/a> has been. Traditional computing is fantastic for straightforward computations with a clear input and output. However, it can struggle when there are multiple possible solutions. Traditional computing can brute-force its way through these calculations, but it&#8217;s very intensive. Quantum computing is an alternative to these problems, which appear in use cases such as drug discovery, logistics networks, and weather forecasting.<\/p>\n<p>While quantum computing is still in its infancy, it&#8217;s developing rapidly. Each month, quantum computing firms announce new records for accuracy, which is a major problem with quantum computing currently. In July, Rigetti Computing announced that its Ankaa-3 system with four 9-qubit chips achieved a 99.5% two-qubit gate fidelity, a measure of how accurate a calculation is through two processing gates. While that&#8217;s impressive, it&#8217;s nowhere near where it needs to be to become commercially viable.<\/p>\n<p>Most quantum computing companies point toward 2030 as the key year for quantum computing becoming a widely used technology, and both D-Wave and Rigetti are racing toward that goal. But they&#8217;re getting there via two different paths.<\/p>\n<p>Each company is taking a different approach toward quantum computing<\/p>\n<p>There are a few ways to perform quantum computing. Rigetti Computing is taking the superconducting approach, while D-Wave Quantum is taking the annealing path. Each of these techniques has benefits and drawbacks, and it&#8217;s impossible to know which technique will be the ultimate winner. There could even be multiple winners, depending on the end use.<\/p>\n<p>However, I think the biggest factor is which companies are using the same technique as these two.<\/p>\n<p>D-Wave Quantum uses the quantum annealing approach, which involves solving optimization problems. It looks for the lowest energy state in the solution, which is the optimal answer. This technique isn&#8217;t common, and sets D-Wave apart from the competition. This approach solves a wide range of quantum computing problems and could be easier to scale, giving it some advantages over Rigetti&#8217;s approach.<\/p>\n<p>Rigetti Computing is taking the superconducting path, which is the most popular route. This involves cooling a particle down to near absolute zero, which is quite expensive. The superconducting approach allows for a ton of flexibility, as it is designed to run any quantum computing workloads, making it flexible but also lacking focus in one area. Because it&#8217;s the most popular, Rigetti is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/stock-market\/market-sectors\/information-technology\/ai-stocks\/quantum-computing-stocks\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">competing against massive tech companies<\/a> like Alphabet and IBM, which have far more resources than Rigetti Computing has access to. <\/p>\n<p>As a result, Rigetti may be outspent by its competition, even if its products are solid. Because of D-Wave&#8217;s unique approach, it could carve out a niche for itself in the quantum computing realm, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/stock-market\/market-sectors\/information-technology\/ai-stocks\/quantum-computing-etf\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">makes it a better investment pick<\/a> in my eyes.<\/p>\n<p>Both companies are incredibly risky, and investors must keep that in mind moving forward. However, as long as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/terms\/r\/risk-tolerance\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">position sizing is kept appropriate<\/a>, buying one of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/2025\/08\/15\/best-quantum-computing-stock-dwave-quantum-or-ionq\/?utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">these two quantum computing plays<\/a> can be a great way to introduce some massive upside for your portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>Should you invest $1,000 in Rigetti Computing right now?<\/p>\n<p>Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this:<\/p>\n<p>The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the <a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=3e59baf4-4961-40e6-a0c7-497ca9dd5d9c&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001093%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D17514&amp;utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">10 best stocks<\/a> for investors to buy now\u2026 and Rigetti Computing wasn\u2019t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you\u2019d have $654,624!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you\u2019d have $1,075,117!*<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s worth noting Stock Advisor\u2019s total average return is 1,049% \u2014 a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&amp;P 500. Don\u2019t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"ticker_pitch\" href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=3e59baf4-4961-40e6-a0c7-497ca9dd5d9c&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001093%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_pit%3D17514%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26company%3DRigetti%2520Computing&amp;utm_source=nasdaq&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=aae10943-7052-4857-b1d6-0ee437f430fc\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">See the 10 stocks \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/author\/20439\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Keithen Drury<\/a> has positions in Alphabet. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and International Business Machines. The Motley Fool has a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/legal\/fool-disclosure-policy\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">disclosure policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"body__disclaimer\">The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Key Points There&#8217;s a lot of buzz in the quantum computing investment realm, mainly driven by investors&#8217; willingness&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":103942,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[191,74],"class_list":{"0":"post-103941","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-computing","8":"tag-computing","9":"tag-technology"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103941\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}