{"id":125233,"date":"2025-09-01T16:21:08","date_gmt":"2025-09-01T16:21:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/125233\/"},"modified":"2025-09-01T16:21:08","modified_gmt":"2025-09-01T16:21:08","slug":"brain-computer-interface-control-with-artificial-intelligence-copilots","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/125233\/","title":{"rendered":"Brain\u2013computer interface control with artificial intelligence copilots"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hochberg, L. R. et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442, 164\u2013171 (2006).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gilja, V. et al. Clinical translation of a high-performance neural prosthesis. Nat. Med. 21, 1142\u20131145 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pandarinath, C. et al. High performance communication by people with paralysis using an intracortical brain-computer interface. eLife 6, e18554 (2017).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hochberg, L. R. et al. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485, 372\u2013375 (2012).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Collinger, J. L. et al. High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. Lancet 381, 557\u2013564 (2013).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wodlinger, B. et al. Ten-dimensional anthropomorphic arm control in a human brain-machine interface: difficulties, solutions, and limitations. J. Neural Eng. 12, 016011 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aflalo, T. et al. Decoding motor imagery from the posterior parietal cortex of a tetraplegic human. Science 348, 906\u2013910 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Edelman, B. J. et al. Noninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control. Sci. Robot. 4, eaaw6844 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reddy, S., Dragan, A. D. & Levine, S. Shared autonomy via deep reinforcement learning. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2018.XIV.005<\/a> (RSS, 2018).<\/p>\n

Laghi, M., Magnanini, M., Zanchettin, A. & Mastrogiovanni, F. Shared-autonomy control for intuitive bimanual tele-manipulation. In 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) 1\u20139 (IEEE, 2018).<\/p>\n

Tan, W. et al. On optimizing interventions in shared autonomy. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 5341\u20135349 (AAAI, 2022).<\/p>\n

Yoneda, T., Sun, L., Yang, G., Stadie, B. & Walter, M. To the noise and back: diffusion for shared autonomy. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2023.XIX.014<\/a> (RSS, 2023).<\/p>\n

Peng, Z., Mo, W., Duan, C., Li, Q. & Zhou, B. Learning from active human involvement through proxy value propagation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 20552\u201320563 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McMahan, B. J., Peng, Z., Zhou, B. & Kao, J. C. Shared autonomy with IDA: interventional diffusion assistance. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 27412\u201327425 (2024).<\/p>\n

Shannon, C. E. Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 30, 50\u201364 (1951).<\/p>\n

Karpathy, A., Johnson, J. & Fei-Fei, L. Visualizing and understanding recurrent networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations https:\/\/openreview.net\/pdf\/71BmK0m6qfAE8VvKUQWB.pdf<\/a> (ICLR, 2016).<\/p>\n

Radford, A. et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI https:\/\/cdn.openai.com\/better-language-models\/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_learners.pdf<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Gilja, V. et al. A high-performance neural prosthesis enabled by control algorithm design. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1752\u20131757 (2012).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dangi, S., Orsborn, A. L., Moorman, H. G. & Carmena, J. M. Design and analysis of closed-loop decoder adaptation algorithms for brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput. 25, 1693\u20131731 (2013).<\/p>\n

MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Orsborn, A. L. et al. Closed-loop decoder adaptation shapes neural plasticity for skillful neuroprosthetic control. Neuron 82, 1380\u20131393 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Silversmith, D. B. et al. Plug-and-play control of a brain\u2013computer interface through neural map stabilization. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 326\u2013335 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, S.-P., Simeral, J. D., Hochberg, L. R., Donoghue, J. P. & Black, M. J. Neural control of computer cursor velocity by decoding motor cortical spiking activity in humans with tetraplegia. J. Neural Eng. 5, 455 (2008).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sussillo, D. et al. A recurrent neural network for closed-loop intracortical brain\u2013machine interface decoders. J. Neural Eng. 9, 026027 (2012).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sussillo, D., Stavisky, S. D., Kao, J. C., Ryu, S. I. & Shenoy, K. V. Making brain\u2013machine interfaces robust to future neural variability. Nat. Commun. 7, 13749 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kao, J. C. et al. Single-trial dynamics of motor cortex and their applications to brain-machine interfaces. Nat. Commun. 6, 7759 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kao, J. C., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I. & Shenoy, K. V. A high-performance neural prosthesis incorporating discrete state selection with hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 935\u2013945 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shenoy, K. V. & Carmena, J. M. Combining decoder design and neural adaptation in brain-machine interfaces. Neuron 84, 665\u2013680 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lawhern, V. J. et al. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain\u2013computer interfaces. J. Neural Eng. 15, 056013 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Forenzo, D., Zhu, H., Shanahan, J., Lim, J. & He, B. Continuous tracking using deep learning-based decoding for noninvasive brain\u2013computer interface. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae145 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pfurtscheller, G. & Da Silva, F. L. Event-related EEG\/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110, 1842\u20131857 (1999).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Olsen, S. et al. An artificial intelligence that increases simulated brain\u2013computer interface performance. J. Neural Eng. 18, 046053 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A. & Klimov, O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1707.06347<\/a> (2017).<\/p>\n

Liu, S. et al. Grounding DINO: marrying DINO with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. In 18th European Conference 38\u201355 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n

Golub, M. D., Yu, B. M., Schwartz, A. B. & Chase, S. M. Motor cortical control of movement speed with implications for brain-machine interface control. J. Neurophysiol. 112, 411\u2013429 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sachs, N. A., Ruiz-Torres, R., Perreault, E. J. & Miller, L. E. Brain-state classification and a dual-state decoder dramatically improve the control of cursor movement through a brain-machine interface. J. Neural Eng. 13, 016009 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kao, J. C., Nuyujukian, P., Ryu, S. I. & Shenoy, K. V. A high-performance neural prosthesis incorporating discrete state selection with hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 935\u2013945 (2017).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stieger, J. R. et al. Mindfulness improves brain\u2013computer interface performance by increasing control over neural activity in the alpha band. Cereb. Cortex 31, 426\u2013438 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stieger, J. R., Engel, S. A. & He, B. Continuous sensorimotor rhythm based brain computer interface learning in a large population. Sci. Data 8, 98 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Edelman, B. J., Baxter, B. & He, B. EEG source imaging enhances the decoding of complex right-hand motor imagery tasks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 63, 4\u201314 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scherer, R. et al. Individually adapted imagery improves brain-computer interface performance in end-users with disability. PLoS ONE 10, e0123727 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Millan, J. d. R. et al. A local neural classifier for the recognition of EEG patterns associated to mental tasks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 13, 678\u2013686 (2002).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, D. et al. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states from EEG signals for cognitive brain\u2013computer interface. Brain Sci. 14, 498 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meng, J. et al. Noninvasive electroencephalogram based control of a robotic arm for reach and grasp tasks. Sci. Rep. 6, 38565 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jeong, J.-H., Shim, K.-H., Kim, D.-J. & Lee, S.-W. Brain-controlled robotic arm system based on multi-directional CNN-BiLSTM network using EEG signals. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 28, 1226\u20131238 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, R. et al. NOIR: neural signal operated intelligent robots for everyday activities. In Proc. 7th Conference on Robot Learning 1737\u20131760 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Jeon, H. J., Losey, D. P. & Sadigh, D. Shared autonomy with learned latent actions. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2020.XVI.011<\/a> (RSS, 2020).<\/p>\n

Javdani, S., Bagnell, J. A. & Srinivasa, S. S. Shared autonomy via hindsight optimization. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2015.XI.032<\/a> (RSS, 2015).<\/p>\n

Newman, B. A. et al. HARMONIC: a multimodal dataset of assistive human-robot collaboration. Int. J. Robot. Res. 41, 3\u201311 (2022).<\/p>\n

Jain, S. & Argall, B. Probabilistic human intent recognition for shared autonomy in assistive robotics. ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact. 9, 2 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Losey, D. P., Srinivasan, K., Mandlekar, A., Garg, A. & Sadigh, D. Controlling assistive robots with learned latent actions. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 378\u2013384 (IEEE, 2020).<\/p>\n

Cui, Y. et al. No, to the right: online language corrections for robotic manipulation via shared autonomy. In Proc. 2023 ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 93\u2013101 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n

Karamcheti, S. et al. Learning visually guided latent actions for assistive teleoperation. In Proc. 3rd Conference on Learning for Dynamics and Control 1230\u20131241 (PMLR, 2021).<\/p>\n

Chi, C. et al. Diffusion policy: visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. Int. J. Rob. Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02783649241273668<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Brohan, A. et al. RT-1: robotics transformer for real-world control at scale. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2023.XIX.025<\/a> (RSS, 2023).<\/p>\n

Brohan, A. et al. RT-2: vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In Proc. 7th Conference on Robot Learning 2165\u20132183 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Nair, S., Rajeswaran, A., Kumar, V., Finn, C. & Gupta, A. R3M: a universal visual representation for robot manipulation. In Proc. 6th Conference on Robot Learning 892\u2013909 (PMLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Ma, Y. J. et al. VIP: towards universal visual reward and representation via value-implicit pre-training. In 11th International Conference on Learning Representations https:\/\/openreview.net\/pdf?id=YJ7o2wetJ2<\/a> (ICLR, 2023).<\/p>\n

Khazatsky, A. et al. DROID: a large-scale in-the-wild robot manipulation dataset. In Proc. Robotics: Science and Systems https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15607\/RSS.2024.XX.120<\/a> (RSS, 2024).<\/p>\n

Open X-Embodiment Collaboration. Open X-Embodiment: robotic learning datasets and RT-X models. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 6892\u20136903 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Willett, F. R. et al. A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis. Nature 620, 1031\u20131036 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leonard, M. K. et al. Large-scale single-neuron speech sound encoding across the depth of human cortex. Nature 626, 593\u2013602 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Card, N. S. et al. An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 391, 609\u2013618 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sato, M. et al. Scaling law in neural data: non-invasive speech decoding with 175\u2009hours of EEG data. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2407.07595<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Kaifosh, P., Reardon, T. R. & CTRL-labs at Reality Labs. A generic non-invasive neuromotor interface for human\u2013computer interaction. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-025-09255-w<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Zeng, H. et al. Semi-autonomous robotic arm reaching with hybrid gaze-brain machine interface. Front. Neurorobot. 13, 111 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shafti, A., Orlov, P. & Faisal, A. A. Gaze-based, context-aware robotic system for assisted reaching and grasping. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation 863\u2013869 (IEEE, 2019).<\/p>\n

Argall, B. D. Autonomy in rehabilitation robotics: an intersection. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 1, 441\u2013463 (2018).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nuyujukian, P. et al. Monkey models for brain-machine interfaces: the need for maintaining diversity. In Proc. 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE EMBS 1301\u20131305 (IEEE, 2011).<\/p>\n

Suminski, A. J., Tkach, D. C., Fagg, A. H. & Hatsopoulos, N. G. Incorporating feedback from multiple sensory modalities enhances brain-machine interface control. J. Neurosci. 30, 16777\u201316787 (2010).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kaufman, M. T. et al. The largest response component in motor cortex reflects movement timing but not movement type. eNeuro 3, ENEURO.0085\u201316.2016 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dangi, S. et al. Continuous closed-loop decoder adaptation with a recursive maximum likelihood algorithm allows for rapid performance acquisition in brain-machine interfaces. Neural Comput. 26, 1811\u20131839 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47, 381 (1954).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gramfort, A. et al. MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. NeuroImage 86, 446\u2013460 (2014).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, J. Y. et al. Data: brain\u2013computer interface control with artificial intelligence copilots. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15165133<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Lee, J. Y. et al. kaolab-research\/bci_raspy. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15164641<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Lee, J. Y. et al. kaolab-research\/bci_plot. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.15164643<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Hochberg, L. R. et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 442,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":125234,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[182,181,507,80013,4435,257,80014,74],"class_list":{"0":"post-125233","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-artificial-intelligence","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-artificial-intelligence","10":"tag-artificialintelligence","11":"tag-brain-machine-interface","12":"tag-engineering","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-neural-decoding","15":"tag-technology"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125233","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=125233"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/125233\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/125234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=125233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=125233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=125233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}