{"id":12788,"date":"2025-07-15T23:20:06","date_gmt":"2025-07-15T23:20:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/12788\/"},"modified":"2025-07-15T23:20:06","modified_gmt":"2025-07-15T23:20:06","slug":"entanglement-accelerates-quantum-simulation-nature-physics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/12788\/","title":{"rendered":"Entanglement accelerates quantum simulation | Nature Physics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A. & Vedral, V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517\u2013576 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865\u2013942 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Walter, M., Gross, D. & Eisert, J. in Quantum Information: From Foundations to Quantum Technology Applications (eds Bruss, D. & Leuchs, G.) 293\u2013330 (Wiley, 2016).<\/p>\n

Zeng, B., Chen, X., Zhou, D.-L. & Wen, X.-G. Quantum Information Meets Quantum Matter: From Quantum Entanglement to Topological Phases in Many-body Systems (Springer, 2019).<\/p>\n

Qi, X.-L. Does gravity come from quantum information? Nat. Phys. 14, 984\u2013987 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vidal, G. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Datta, A., Shaji, A. & Caves, C. M. Quantum discord and the power of one qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 050502 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

D\u2019Alessio, L., Kafri, Y., Polkovnikov, A. & Rigol, M. From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Adv. Phys. 65, 239\u2013362 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gogolin, C. & Eisert, J. Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems. Rep. Progr. Phys. 79, 056001 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nandkishore, R. & Huse, D. A. Many-body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15\u201338 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Serbyn, M., Abanin, D. A. & Papi\u0107, Z. Quantum many-body scars and weak breaking of ergodicity. Nat. Phys. 17, 675\u2013685 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cirac, J. I., Perez-Garcia, D., Schuch, N. & Verstraete, F. Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: concepts, symmetries, theorems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Or\u00fas, R. Tensor networks for complex quantum systems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 538\u2013550 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Altman, E. et al. Quantum simulators: architectures and opportunities. PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073\u20131078 (1996).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berry, D. W., Ahokas, G., Cleve, R. & Sanders, B. C. Efficient quantum algorithms for simulating sparse Hamiltonians. Commun. Math. Phys. 270, 359\u2013371 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berry, D. W. & Childs, A. M. Black-box Hamiltonian simulation and unitary implementation. Quantum Inf. Comput. 12, 29\u201362 (2012).<\/p>\n

MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., Cleve, R., Kothari, R. & Somma, R. D. Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics with a truncated Taylor series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 090502 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 010501 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Low, G. H. & Chuang, I. L. Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization. Quantum 3, 163 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Childs, A. M. & Su, Y. Nearly optimal lattice simulation by product formulas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050503 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J. & Su, Y. Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9456\u20139461 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Tran, M. C., Wiebe, N. & Zhu, S. Theory of Trotter error with commutator scaling. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011020 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

\u015eahino\u011flu, B. & Somma, R. D. Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 119 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

An, D., Fang, D. & Lin, L. Time-dependent unbounded Hamiltonian simulation with vector norm scaling. Quantum 5, 459 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, Q., Zhou, Y., Shaw, A. F., Li, T. & Childs, A. M. Hamiltonian simulation with random inputs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 270502 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, C.-F. & Brand\u00e3o, F. G. Average-case speedup for product formulas. Commun. Math. Phys. 405, 32 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Su, Y., Huang, H.-Y. & Campbell, E. T. Nearly tight Trotterization of interacting electrons. Quantum 5, 495 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scott, A. J. Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hayden, P., Leung, D. W. & Winter, A. Aspects of generic entanglement. Commun. Math. Phys. 265, 95\u2013117 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Suzuki, M. General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics. J. Math. Phys. 32, 400\u2013407 (1991).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tran, M. C., Chu, S.-K., Su, Y., Childs, A. M. & Gorshkov, A. V. Destructive error interference in product-formula lattice simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 220502 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Layden, D. First-order Trotter error from a second-order perspective. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 210501 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, H., Ikeda, T. N. & Huse, D. A. Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. Phys. Rev. E 90, 052105 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shi, F., Li, M.-S., Chen, L. & Zhang, X. k-uniform quantum information masking. Phys. Rev. A 104, 032601 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Paeckel, S. et al. Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states. Ann. Phys. 411, 167998 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bravyi, S., Hastings, M. B. & Verstraete, F. Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050401 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, B., Xu, J., Zhao, Q. & Yuan, X. Error interference in quantum simulation. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2411.03255<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Aaronson, S. Shadow tomography of quantum states. SIAM J. Comput. 49, STOC18-368 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R. & Preskill, J. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nat. Phys. 16, 1050\u20131057 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, Y. & Liu, Q. Performance analysis of multi-shot shadow estimation. Quantum 7, 1044 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kovalsky, L. K. et al. Self-healing of Trotter error in digital adiabatic state preparation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 060602 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yi, C. & Crosson, E. Spectral analysis of product formulas for quantum simulation. npj Quantum Inf 8, 37 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bravyi, S. Monte Carlo simulation of stoquastic Hamiltonians. Quantum Inf. Comput. 15, 1122\u20131140 (2015).<\/p>\n

MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bravyi, S. & Gosset, D. Polynomial-time classical simulation of quantum ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100503 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Motta, M. et al. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution. Nat. Phys. 16, 205\u2013210 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Howard, M., Wallman, J., Veitch, V. & Emerson, J. Contextuality supplies the \u2018magic\u2019 for quantum computation. Nature 510, 351\u2013355 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Streltsov, A., Adesso, G. & Plenio, M. B. Colloquium: quantum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cotler, J. S. et al. Emergent quantum state designs from individual many-body wavefunctions. PRX Quantum 4, 010311 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., Torlai, G., Albert, V. V. & Preskill, J. Provably efficient machine learning for quantum many-body problems. Science 377, eabk3333 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A. & Vedral, V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517\u2013576…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":12789,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[2362,2361,2366,2365,257,2360,2363,2364,199,12506,12507,79,2359],"class_list":{"0":"post-12788","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-atomic","9":"tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","10":"tag-complex-systems","11":"tag-condensed-matter-physics","12":"tag-general","13":"tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","14":"tag-molecular","15":"tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","16":"tag-physics","17":"tag-quantum-information","18":"tag-quantum-simulation","19":"tag-science","20":"tag-theoretical"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12788\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}